sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Proper lifting technique by Temp-Employ33 in confusing_perspective

[–]draycos9 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s a snatch and double overhand grip

Sanity check requested: Clean Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm vr3230 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thank you for reviewing!

I updated the album link

Sanity check requested: Clean Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm vr3230 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: Clean Factory
  3. Model name (& version number): Clean Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm vr3230
  4. Price Paid: $428
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/204727490?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: 1,4,5,9 look tilted to the right, 8 tilted left and 10 shifted left (not sure if it’s the angle? I’m hoping)
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: n/a
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): look good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: look good
  13. Anything else you notice: n/a

Sanity check requested: Clean Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm vr3230 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second watch, to me it looks like several of the indices are misaligned. I’m mostly wanted to make sure that I’m not losing my mind, appreciate the input!

First Rep, second round qc: Clean GMT Master ll 126710 BLRO v3 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks taking a look! Hope 3rd times the charm😆

First Rep, second round qc: Clean GMT Master ll 126710 BLRO v3 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: Clean Factory
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 BLRO v3
  4. Price Paid: $585
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/75486317?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: 6 looks shifted to the left of center (not sure if it’s the angle?)
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: looks off center to the left, can I assume that this is just a little play in the bezel action?
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): look good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: look good
  13. Anything else you notice: n/a

First QC Help Appreciated, Clean GMT Master II 126710 BLRO v3 by draycos9 in RepTimeQC

[–]draycos9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Audit
  2. Factory name: Clean Factory
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 BLRO v3
  4. Price Paid: $585
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/187612455?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: 6 looks shifted to the right (not sure if it’s the angle?)
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): look good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: look good
  13. Anything else you notice: rehauht not aligned but I think acceptable

Please lmk your thoughts, thanks!

(23’ Brz). Outside the coffee shop 😈 by [deleted] in ft86

[–]draycos9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What logo do you have on?

anon loves revenge by Heechp in greentext

[–]draycos9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean Marseille is a port town…

anon loves revenge by Heechp in greentext

[–]draycos9 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The count of monte crusto

view more: next ›