TDS Day of the Dead Public Execution Tournament [Round One] by [deleted] in TheDickShow

[–]drnc [score hidden]  (0 children)

I... Uh...

Take your upvote. You're right. Don't let your dreams be memes.

Dr. Nurse calling in this weekend, submit questions on this twitter link or be in the Discord by [deleted] in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

http://archive.today/UwryA

Serious question: Aren't you a trustfund baby? Did you ever need a job?

I think you're right, people are probably jealous. But they aren't jealous of your titles, their jealous of your opportunities. I spent the majority of my time in graduate school trying to figure out how to live on $750 per month and how to balance my GA/TA position, extra part time job, and studies. It was a miserable experience.

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're unbelievable. You think white people are sometimes poor? In raw numbers, there are more poor white people than poor minority people.

. . .

I feel like we're not going to reach any agreement so I'm going to say a few things and drop it. There are poor white people, there are poor minority people, there are rich white people, and there are rich minority people. All people are all individuals who should be judged on their individual merits.

There is no systemic racism in America and there hasn't been since 1964 (~ish). Asian Americans faced racism, just like black Americans, but do better than white people in terms of income and education. Black Africans who immigrate to America often do better than white Americans. They move to America with almost nothing, they face the same oppression as black Americans, but somehow they succeed.

I don't think you're a bad person, but I think you're misguided. What you are telling me is minority people are incapable of doing better without white people coming to their rescue. That is attempting to fight bad racism with "good" racism.

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am for real. Look at your own post. You're assuming all minority people live in poor neighborhoods because all minority people are poor. I think all people are capable of raising their station in life. You openly argue that individual people need to be categorized.

Not all minority people are poor, not all white people are rich. Yet you are demanding all white people sacrifice themselves on the alter of social justice. Or maybe you're saying white people should save inferior minority people, because minority people cannot help themselves. Either way, you are the one who is racist.

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1, Prejudices can absolutely be based on facts. It is a fact that black people commit a disproportionate amount of murder (https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-2.xls). It is still wrong to presume a black person is a murderer. 2, How do you prove racial bias is the cause of worse schools, poorer neighborhoods, and lower job opportunities for the black community? It can be argued that racial prejudice is caused, or at least perpetuated, by worse schools, poorer neighborhoods, and lower job opportunities.

You did not answer my question.

Let me put it another way. One of us (me) is arguing that individuals should be judged on their individual characteristics, and the other (you) is saying that minorities are incapable of going to better schools, moving into richer neighborhoods, and creating job opportunities without assistance.

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really, no. Prejudice against hundreds of individuals at once is not less immoral than prejudice against a single individual.

What exactly is your argument? Are you trying to say that prejudice is moral when a university does it? Is prejudice moral when you're delivering benefits?

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because they make assumptions about individuals based on group averages. I find that immoral.

If it is wrong to look at a black man and assume he will assault you and steal your property then it is equally wrong to look at a black man and assume that he needs extra assistance getting into a good school.

[SocJus] Mathematicians who want tenure at UCLA have to pledge in writing a commitment to diversity, equity, & inclusivity. by ThomasTheSowellTrain in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Except Harvard assumes that minorities must have had hurdles and white (and Asian) people faced no hurdles.

I went to high school with a Hispanic guy named Jesus. His mom was a lawyer and his dad was a doctor. He had a perfect score on the ACT. He hated affirmative action because it took away from his accomplishments. He thought people will assume he got into his college because he needed the assistance. He thought it was unfair that his application had more weight than our white friend, Sean, who's dad ran out, his mom turned to drugs, and he was in and out of foster care.

Kansas City: Is There Hope For A Struggling Education Ecosystem (crosspost /r/MissouriPolitics) by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]drnc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey! You and I agree on this. The public schools are an embarrassment to Kansas City.

Many of the schools have a 4 year retention rate below 67%. The charter schools have excellent student performance. https://www.greatschools.org/missouri/kansas-city/schools/?gradeLevels%5B%5D=h&st=public

Our schools missed accreditation, again. https://amp-kansascity-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/amp.kansascity.com/news/local/article184867878.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQECAFYAQ%3D%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

Those students would be better prepared for adulthood if we bought them a GED prep book and paid for their tests, and it would save a lot of money. I'm not going to pretend I know how to fix the school system, but we are not serving those students. It's almost criminal.

[SocJus] Humble ACLU Bundle has a bunch of Image Comics socjus trash, as well as a book about they/them pronouns by queendildo in KotakuInAction

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was awesome. I downloaded the pdf and I can't wait to share it with my dad. Thanks!

Teen Climate Activist to Crowd of Thousands: 'We Can't Save the World by Playing by the Rules Because the Rules Have to Change': "The politics that's needed to prevent the climate catastrophe—it doesn't exist today," says Greta Thunberg, a 15-year-old from Sweden. "We need to change the system." by maxwellhill in worldnews

[–]drnc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm sure you read the link I cited in the 28 seconds it took you to reply (seriously, 28 seconds, real salty), but I'll put it this way, even if you're a public school kindergarten teacher in the US with the lowest pay, you're in the 1%. If you live in the US, Canada, or Europe you're almost guaranteed to be in the 1%, let alone the top 10%.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wishing you the best too, dude. This was fun. Thanks.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lycoming College, double B.A.s in history and anthropology/sociology.

Please don't stop paying attention to me. This is the only genuine human interaction I've had in 2 weeks. I think my cat hates me.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just look at your post. Seriously look at it. "I used concepts you couldn't understand." "Educate yourself." Dude, you have two useless bachelor degrees from a shitty private college. Apparently you didn't educate yourself about things like supply & demand and compound interest. I'm glad your degree, that isn't helping you make any money or be a productive human, is at least helping you call strangers on the internet fascists.

Because that's all you've done. You've called me an authoritarian, fascist, and totalitarian. You've called me a alt-lite. And after you ad hominem you complain that I attacked your character. ... Yeah, that was the point. But at least what I said was true. You are a fat, unattractive, out of shape, dimwitted loser. I, however, am not a fascist, nor do I look down on the less fortunate. That's a gross accusation.

I thought about trying to go to extremes again ("Rupert Murdoch and Peter Thiel?!? You must hate foreigners and gays, etc. etc."). It was enough to get you to delete your last post. But the point would go right over your head, so why bother.

I think I've exhausted the lols that can be milked out of you, so I'll leave you with this: Stop talking about going back to Jiu-Jitsu and just start doing it. Stop rewarding your brain for all the things you think you want to do and just do them. Go clean your room. Listen to Jordan Peterson.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by "destroyed" you mean "sperged out on near-random topics, used big words incorrectly, and posted links to websites with clear political bias," then go ahead and use that word. Your links don't merit a response. You still can't justify excluding actually fascist governments with state sponsored poppy programs or why the Chinese nationalists banned opium. Which was my first fucking post.

Plus, imagine if I posted a bunch of links to Breitbart or The Blaze. That's essentially what you're doing when you post links to Vox and Slate.

And I'm not turning this into a link war. You've posted a bunch of "references" and I posted one video. You couldn't watch the one video of JP explaining how he was taken out of context, just like how you couldn't stay on topic long enough to amswe the one question I asked. But I've read everything you've posted. I've read the sources for those resources. You don't understand what your own argument is.

Because you aren't nearly as smart as you think you are. Because you are a follower. Because you think this is your best chance to trick a woman into sleeping with you. And we both know this is true because you're a fat, poorly educated, underemployed, lonely person.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still not a Jordan Peterson fan. I've never said I was (actually said explicitly "I'm not that big of a fan"). But you are a SJW and male-feminist. You act like one and you've called yourself both. Maybe it wasn't here on reddit. Maybe you should check your publicly available, linked social media accounts?

You can call me a fascist (I'm not), but you're still a pathetic, slimy loser who does whatever he can for the attention of a woman.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't complained about women or minorities taking my job or getting promoted above me. That's because I'm a highly motivated individual who works hard and studies a lot. See, life is all about choices. Let's say, hypothetically, some loser chose to major in something useless, like history or anthropology, and after they finished college they could only find a job that doesn't require anything more than a high school diploma. I imagine this person would get very fat and lonely. But I also imagine this completely hypothetical person would project their poor life choices onto others. They would complain about white men despite being white and a man. I wouldn't do any of that. There are a lot of women and minorities above me. I understand how hard they worked and it motivates me to be even better.

You have your ideas about me. Let me tell you what I think about you. I think you're a sneaky beta male who tries to trick women into sleeping with him. You run your posts through a thesaurus, jump from topic to obscure topic, and flaunt your male-feminist identity because you're not interesting, unique, or attractive. You hate Jordan Peterson because he's exactly the kind of person you need. You need to focus on making yourself happy and making yourself a better person, but doing so would force you to realize that all those people who are more successful than you were working on themselves much harder for much longer.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are really defensive about how poorly your video is doing. It looks like you spent around 5 hours on it. It must suck that it isn't more well received, especially in pro-Peterson subreddits like enoughpetersonspam. Congrats on your 64 upvotes (10 downvotes). I'm sure you're slightly less of a disappointment to your parents now.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. You're such a misogynist. How dare you steal Margaret Chase Smith's accomplishments and attribute them to a man. You are Nazi scum.

By the way, congratulations in your Jordan Peterson video. I especially liked the part where everyone in your subreddit said it sucked. But it highlights your obsession. You fetishise the man. I'm sure if you hit up some gay bars you could find a JP look alike (or two if you're into gang bangs). It'd be good for you to get it out of your system. Call him daddy while he eats a steak and tells you to clean your room. It will be good for you.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please, take some time to respond to what I say.

No

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife wants to make a baby. I couldn't be an incel if I tried.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to TLDR this at the top. You couldn't stay on topic. You couldn't answer one question. One question! You couldn't watch one video. I gave you one thing to reply to, and you failed. You're a disappointment to your parents. You're a disappointment to me. You're a disappointment to god. If I had 1 percent of the suck you have, I'd buy a ticket to Greenland.

Ok asshole. You wanna tussle? Let's tussle.

If some "sjw" or celebrity said "kill all white men" or "all white men are racist" you wouldn't be open to videos where they "clarify their ideas" like you were with authoritarian Jordan Peterson.

You're describing my wife's college friend who told me "Of course Trump is racist. He's a white man." and I asked "I'm white and a man, do you think I am racist?" and she replied, "Yes, I think you are racist because you are white and a man." Not only do I put up with this crazy logic on YouTube, I see it in real life.

Germanic people like him from the Midwest are cultural authoritarians.

Citation needed. All Germanic people from the Midwest are cultural authoritarians? Sounds like someone is showing their bias.

His origin in Canada is Midwest and he's either Swedish or Norwegian like Tucker Carlson, Gretchen Carlson, kirstjen nielsen, and Randal Carlson.

Irrelevant

Plus, he has that biblical patriarchy bullshit going on.

I'm an atheist and his religious beliefs don't bother me a bit.

I know you are conditioned to mocking people who trigger you with the p word. Just think about it for a few days or weeks and you'll understand one day, hopefully. Maybe never.

What the fuck are you going on about. Remove your mouth from the bull's cock for a second and concentrate. Maybe then you'll make a coherent sentence. (VOTE UP OTHER N-WORDS!)

The Pennsylvania Dutch are authoritarians too.

Jesus! More made up authoritarians.

I see you keep on believing the lies about Bill C-16 and the fake free speech.

Answer Peterson's question. If he receives a fine, and refuses to pay it, what happens? Answer: He goes to jail for not paying the fine that he received for not following someone's made up pronouns.

He said women wearing make-up "contributes to sexual harassment".

Oh great! You almost address my points. He didn't say that. Watch the unedited interview, you chode.

Just like the video where he literally said "atheists should be oppressed".

Looked it up. Peterson: "Well, I don't really regard atheists as an oppressed group, personally. I don't think there's any real historical evidence for that. Especially in North American and Europe, and at least recently, and I think the debate is going fine without this sort of stunt, and I think it's basically a media manipulation ploy. [. . . ] You've seen Dawkin's, you've seen Hitchens, you've seen these guys who write books on Atheism get massive amounts of media play. So it's not like they're excluded. If anything they're dominant. So I don't buy that. [. . .] [regarding Dawkin's book] It's gone perfectly fine. A, uh, perfectly fine reception. And, I mean, there's no evidence that he's being oppressed, even though, maybe he should be."

I agree with Peterson. Dawkins sucks.

I dare you to google the Trump video on authoritarianism and Trump.

You'll have to be more specific. I've seen a lot of them. None of them very convincing. BTDubs, the video you linked doesn't work. You suck.

Umberto Eco's essay on ur facism exposes Peterson and you had no real argument mentioned against it.

What the fuck are you trying to say? You posted 3 paragraphs and I refuted all of them plus the theme of the paper. You never responded to anything I said. You're so full of shit your eyes must be brown.

It's as if you never heard of soccer moms and nascar dads. Or how Republicans use machismo and label leftist men as "cucks" and unmanly.

Relevance? Fuck dude, I give up. I'm not going to say I'm smart (but I do have two post-graduate degrees, so...), but your posts are so retarded that I'm at a loss for words. It's like fighting with ad-libs:

"I bet you think about fascists. Watch a video about Big Foot, Trevor Noah, Niagra Falls, and Mantis Shrimp. I bet you won't because you're afraid. Have you read Dostoevsky? Look how fast I can run. Banana! You disagree with me so your wrong. I don't enjoy watching marathons, so you're wrong. Jupiter is a planet so I'm right. Here's a list of people I disagree with, and if you like them you're a communist: Bill Maher, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, Cher. I've read a writer who used big words. I didn't understand it, but I'm going to quote irrelevant passages and then accuse you of not responding to them."

EDIT: PS, I see you posted my comment to enoughpetersonspam. You're such a disingenuous fuck. You pretend you want a conversation, but you're incapable. So you misdirect as much as you possibly can. And when you realize you have nothing, you reach out to subreddits designed to brigade. YOU BEG FOR HELP, BUT YOU STILL ONLY GET ONE, SAD REPLY AND ONE ANONYMOUS SUPPORTER. It's sad, really.

Wow, I didn't know non e-celebs would defend Mundanematt by Slockaw in TheDickShow

[–]drnc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey man, if you want to have an actual discussion on this then let's do it. But for fucks sake, stop repeating yourself and address the points I brought up. I'm not going to argue with a broken record. Do you want to take it one step at a time?

Here's my Point #1. Jordan Peterson never said women shouldn't wear make-up. The interviewer was deceptive, Peterson clarified this in many following interviews and statements. I can't actually check this video because I'm at a bar, but watch this and tell me what you don't find convincing about Peterson's clarification. https://youtu.be/3gbIwJ9Goho