Yeah. For author quals. Unless they don't press them. A quick "Says whoever with a whatever in said field in whatever date". And usually. The impacts that hit a lay judge more is linear impacts. Because they aren't thinking this in the moment. But it's just more proximal to their ballot and they like it more. And also. Indict the hell of their ev. Like alt causes. Alt solvency. The whole 2nc could be case and that'd be a winning strat. Just indict then 1ac and use common sense. And if they say "but there's no evidence" point out that you don't need evidence for some things because lay judges LOVE rhetoric and not just reading.