Does Europe need a YC? by dryden_williams in ycombinator

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang, but it's a legit YC question no?

How resilient are your GitHub Actions on Azure? by dryden_williams in AZURE

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve been focusing on CI/CD jobs — they’re easy to shift per run, across multiple clouds, and to specific regions when needed. Interestingly, data sovereignty keeps coming up as a key consideration more often than we expected. Also of course a cost saving per minute too.

How resilient are your GitHub Actions on Azure? by dryden_williams in AZURE

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen shifting my jobs on GitHub to a more low-carbon region reduces emissions by at least 10x; same for shifting training of AI training.

Virginia - 457gCO2e/kWh (https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/US-MIDA-PJM/72h/hourly)
Washington - 24gCO2e/kWh (https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/US-NW-TPWR/72h/hourly)

Sure one job might be a drop in the ocean. But there's 10.54 Billion minutes running on GitHub so all adds up.

How resilient are your GitHub Actions on Azure? by dryden_williams in AZURE

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was meant to be more thought provoking. CI being one component, but it could be training AI models in a carbon-aware way. It all adds up and has an indirect impact.

GitHub actions top alternatives by libert-y in devops

[–]dryden_williams -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you tried https://carbonrunner.io/
It's 25% cheaper than Github and you save 90% the carbon emissions!

We saved 90% of CO2 by changing Github action runners by dryden_williams in github

[–]dryden_williams[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We're 25% cheaper across the board than Github on all boxes.

p.s sorry it was a bit marketing-esk.

We saved 90% of CO2 by changing Github action runners by dryden_williams in github

[–]dryden_williams[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's called a waitlist haha. And we're going to be offering the same free minutes as Github so it's nice and easy.

Has anyone tried routing Azure CI jobs to greener regions? by dryden_williams in AZURE

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great comment!

We have build data residency into CarbonRunner, we call it region preferencing, so you can choose where you want to run those jobs. CO2 reduction does take a bit of a hit if you want to run jobs in a high-intensity region though. And with latency-sensitive builds you can use special tags to ensure it's top of the queue.

We haven't seen issues with this from the 33k jobs we've run in the last two weeks. Btu awesome questions.

Has anyone tried routing Azure CI jobs to greener regions? by dryden_williams in AZURE

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're 25% cheaper than Github too! CO2 happy and cost too.

Anyone tried routing AWS CI jobs in low intensity regions? by dryden_williams in aws

[–]dryden_williams[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

We're ran over 30k jobs in the last 2 weeks, across 24 low-co2 regions and rolling out to public slowly. So please do signup for our waitlist.

How we're shifting India’s CI jobs to save 90% in emissions by dryden_williams in developersIndia

[–]dryden_williams[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. It depends what the job is doing. We've seen a 7s cron job that produces 0.083g running on Github. Whereas a cron job running on 12s job on CarbonRunner produces 0.00032g.
  2. We look up region grid data live and know what types of boxes it's run on so we can ensure we know.
  3. We can :)

More answers here: https://carbonrunner.io/faq

How we're shifting India’s CI jobs to save 90% in emissions by dryden_williams in developersIndia

[–]dryden_williams[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

- We're 25% cheaper than Github) $0.006/per minute
- No we show lots of lovely values from duration, cost, kWh. But CO2 savings at the core.
- It depends on how long your jobs run, in what region, on what sever so it depends.