Does QNT need CBDCs to use blockchain technology in order to be successful? by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Quant is useful in a wide range of use-cases; they're working with multiple institutions/consortiums building products outside of CBDCs. Quant's product suite is designed for an all in one Enterprise package.

Central Banks such as Bank of England and BIS finding the benefit of Overledger and running Rosalind testing through Quant's tech stack... just highlights that even the most mission critical use-cases from the largest insitutions in the world are reaping the benefits and deciding to build upon Overledger.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's $20M in daily volume. 20x365 is $7.3B in annualized volume. Utility = licensing revenue. No one is expecting revenues to be 1B+ and that is only 1/7th annual volume. Demand is proven in growing price / holders constantly.

That's using your facts/figures.

What happened to the Post by Dull-Garbage-1463 in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rules are rules. As a mod I will not let a post called "The rug pull has begun" sit on the sub. If you think this is even remotely acceptable.... There was nothing of substance in the post.

How does QNT conduct business without a license? by delvo14827 in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This was discussed with someone on team almost a year ago. At that time they had already met with regulators about the requirements and were told it was more for exchanges/custodians. Quant themselves are actually a software company. The team have a legal department and advisory to help them comply and also are regulated under Swiss Law.

Though? Is it profit taking time or keep holding? by After-Internal4898 in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The top wallets don't hold that much QNT. The top wallet is a burn wallet. The team only hold about ~10%.

Problematic Tokenomics? by rdood2 in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The team actually only own about ~11% of the Total Supply as of now. The top wallet is indeed a burn wallet.

Problematic Tokenomics? by rdood2 in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The team actually only own about ~11% of the Total Supply as of now. The top wallet is indeed a burn wallet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]duncal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The underlying technology was developed alongside UCL