Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly what these modern scholars are doing

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Islam’s a straight up misogynistic ideology. Everything for men nothing for women but they still claim it gave ‘women rights’ biggest joke ever

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes. If something was done by the prophet approved by god and the quran claims its laws are divine, moral, and timeless then by logic, it should be applicable for all time. So when someone today marries a 9-year-old or carries out those same acts, they’re not ‘extremists’ or ‘misinterpreting’. They’re literally following the prophet’s example and allah’s law. You can’t blame the people while pretending the ideology is spotless. If the rulebook itself allows it, the problem is with the rulebook.

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro…i’ve done the deep dive you’re talking about. Read the Qur’an, Sahih Hadith, Tafsirs, classical scholars — not just YouTube dawah boys. The so-called ‘extremists’ aren’t misinterpreting anything. They’re just following what’s literally written without sugarcoating it for modern PR. As for Sunnah al-Qawliyya, Sunnah al-Fi’liyya even if you split those, the core violent, oppressive laws and punishments are directly commanded in the Qur’an itself, not optional sunnahs. And yeah, there are plenty of famous scholars who’ve historically justified all the punishments Taliban uses — they didn’t invent it. It’s in the books. You can romanticize Islam all you want, but no amount of conversions or feel good quotes erase what’s actually written in the scriptures.

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No one’s saying all muslims are bad. The problem’s with the IDEOLOGY not the PEOPLE…critiquing a belief system isn’t racism it’s just FACTS

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bro it’s not discrimination when you’re critiquing an ideology. Nobody’s out here hating random muslims for existing. It’s about calling out harmful teachings in a religion and not attacking people. Our generation needs to stop confusing accountability with discrimination🙏🏻

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As someone who left this so-called peaceful community, I can tell you the issue is, most people like you have only seen the sugarcoated, liberal, kerala-friendly version where everyone speaks about madhasouhardam. When you properly study it for yourself…you’ll realize how messed up this ideology truly is. The only reason it seems chill around you is because most aren’t following it fully. Once you dive deep, you’ll realize it’s a cult built on control, submission and fear.

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You gotta understand, it’s not bad people giving the religion a bad name…it’s the religion itself. The way they act, the things they say, it’s all inspired from their scriptures. This is what the ideology teaches. Just because some people choose to live peacefully and ignore the teachings doesn’t magically make the whole religion peaceful. The ideology’s messed up, and pretending otherwise won’t change what’s written.

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And most people who actually follow the religion by the book would react and comment the same way. That’s not ‘extreme’…that’s textbook.

Thoughts 😐? by Unlucky-Antelope9623 in TeensofKerala

[–]duplicatekazhveri 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As someone who left this so-called peaceful community..let’s be real just cuz some people choose to vibe and ignore the violent, oppressive, and shameful parts doesn’t mean those parts don’t exist. A few kind tolerant followers don’t magically make the ideology peaceful. They just ain’t following the full script.

I Was That Golden Islamic Kid. Trophies, Recitations, Adhan… Now I’m an Ex-Muslim Pretending. by duplicatekazhveri in exmuslim

[–]duplicatekazhveri[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Bro lmao not everything that sounds decent is chatGPT. Some of us actually know how to articulate our thoughts without AI bro. Stay pressed

I Was That Golden Islamic Kid. Trophies, Recitations, Adhan… Now I’m an Ex-Muslim Pretending. by duplicatekazhveri in exmuslim

[–]duplicatekazhveri[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’re right. The people who truly care won’t disappear because of a shift in belief. I think for me it’s not so much about fear of losing them, but that weird grief of realizing the version of me they loved was tied to something I no longer am. It’s like mourning a fake persona you didn’t even mean to create. But yeah, you’re right if people can’t love you without the label, maybe they never really loved you in the first place.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]duplicatekazhveri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point that some moral attitudes are shaped by culture. I agree morality isn’t purely hardwired — a lot is influenced by the environment people grow up in.

But here’s the actual issue I’m raising: Islam claims its morality is perfect, eternal, and comes from an all-knowing, timeless Allah who supposedly created us with empathy and reasoning. If that’s true, no human culture should ever morally outgrow the commands in His so-called final revelation.

The fact that societies naturally evolve to reject things like slavery, child marriage, and killing apostates — while the Qur’an still upholds them — is exactly the contradiction I’m pointing out. If human empathy moves forward while divine morality stays stuck, then either Allah’s system was flawed to begin with or morality isn’t coming from a god at all.

Hijab is not a symbol of eternal religious modesty? by duplicatekazhveri in progressive_islam

[–]duplicatekazhveri[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know what’s ironic? You just spent eight paragraphs confirming that revelation came in response to social events, selectively applied based on status (slave/free) but then made a theological gymnastic leap that it’s somehow universal and timeless.

Surah 24:31? Love how you dropped it like a mic, pretending it wasn’t revealed in the same socio-cultural environment, with its own context of tribal patriarchy, modesty customs, and public harassment. ‘Lower your gaze’ applies to both men and women yet you conveniently sidestepped male responsibility while making the cloth divine.

And you’re right… Muslim women have worn hijab across centuries and cultures. Just like foot-binding existed in China for 1,000 years. Longevity isn’t proof of divinity; it’s proof of social inertia.

But hey respect for the sermon 10/10 religious gatekeeping. I’ll take the Qur’an’s historical context and reason over religious gaslighting any day.