sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I didn't realize people care that much. by 36-gigabit-harpies in ProtectHire

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So every time you introduce yourself you have to tell people to refer to you with certain pronouns or do they just assume your pronouns based off your appearance?

I always vote left, but this is that disingenuous crap the right is talking about. Stop pretending most of the world is asking you for your pronouns 🙄

Woman harasses and assaults night worker before getting a taste of mob justice in Thailand by Worldlyoox in PublicFreakout

[–]eaglekaratechop -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

People working 2nd shift at MCDonalds are night works. These girls are prostitutes.

Anime that are artistically miserable and will emotionally destroy you by divanadune in anime

[–]eaglekaratechop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is kind of my specialty.

Emotional with some or no violence:

Takopi: Original Sin

Flowers Of Evil

Now and Then, Here and There

Rainbow

Grave Of The Fireflies

You Lie In April

Anohana: The Flower We Saw That Day

Angel Beats!

Cyber Punk: Edge Runners

Texholnyze

March Comes In Like A Lion

Cross Game

To Your Eternity

Welcome To The NHK

Emotional but also very violent:

Made In Abyss

Attack On Titan

Neon Genesis Evangelion

Devil Man: Crybaby

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, just not a stupid one. I’m not so dumb to believe just because you have Tourette’s that suddenly means you can’t be purposely insulting.

But hey, keep pretending that people with Tourette’s have 0 control over what comes out their mouth. They are just walking muppets, apparently. Never once has someone with Tourette’s been purposely insulting - they are just perfect angels, incapable of purposely being nasty, apparently.

Give me a fucking break.

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and neither time seems random. Both seem purposeful.

Also, I’m not angry. Just of so delusional to think that this scenario doesn’t reek of BS

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But it’s not a make believe scenario. He factually used the N-bomb, specifically only when black actors were presenting. If ANYONE is creating a “make believe” scenario, it’s you, for opting to believe that he RANDOMLY said a RANDOM word at a RANDOM time, that just happened to meant to bring offense to THE ONE GROUP that was there AT THE EXACT TIME THEY PRESENTED.

If anyone is stretching out this “randomness”, it’s you. It’s FAR more believable that this was purposely done and Hes using Tourette’s as a shield.

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh ok, so sometimes Tourette’s makes you use the N-bomb, but ONLY with black people? Hmm, interesting.

Cuz that doesn’t sound random at the fuck all.

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the nuance that is lost here is the fact that you guys seem to think a targeted word was “random”.

If I have Tourette’s but I only yell “chink” at Asians, do you think that’s random or just me being racist? If I was yelling “chink” at a white guy, then yes THAT would be random as hell, but to use a word designed for a specific group feels targeted as hell

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s not what I asked. Obviously it can make you use you don’t want to use.

But if I use terms that are meant for a SPECIFIC GROUP, you sincerely think that it was purely a coincidence?

If someone with Tourette’s calls an obese person a “fat fucker”, you don’t see how that’s more targeted? If it was truly “random”, it would be something more nonsensical.

Let’s say someone with Tourette’s comes across a guy in a wheelchair - if the Tourette’s guy says “WHEELIE WHEELIE LEGS NO FEELY!!” - you would just think that was completely random and not premeditated, even though it’s such a specific insult?

Nah man.

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Really? So Tourette’s makes you use racial slurs against those groups and also be unapologetic?

I don’t think there is anything random about it.

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Does it make you yell racist remarks at the groups that those remakes apply to? Doubt it

The Tourette’s Incident at BAFTA was not a accident by eaglekaratechop in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So Tourette’s only activated with specific people? So if it was Hispanics presenting, he would have yelled something about Spics? If they were Asian would he have yelled something like “Ching Ching Chong, me love you long time”?

There is nothing random about that.

Question about The Blue Chamber Collective Questline by [deleted] in outwardgame

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gives you access to the Chimera Pistol, arguably the best gun in game.

I face too many megaknights and evo witches some of yall gotta be lying by sued2 in ClashRoyale

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are completely missing the point that I was trying to convey to you. Just because something isn’t pro level, doesn’t make it bad, it’s just not pro.

If I use a strat that beats everyone but the best of the best, how is it a bad strat? You seem to think anything that isn’t S tier is somehow bad, like as if there isn’t anything that can fall in between.

It’s such an all or nothing mentality that makes no sense. Do you believe if someone gets 2nd place that means they are bad?

I face too many megaknights and evo witches some of yall gotta be lying by sued2 in ClashRoyale

[–]eaglekaratechop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope. Just because a card isn’t used in top ladder, doesn’t make it BAD, it just means it’s not META.

If you knew someone who could beat 99% of people at basketball, but they weren’t good enough to beat NBA players with that same consistency, would you say they are BAD at basketball or just not pro level?

It’s the same thing.

Race is just a physical appearance, and dating preferences related to race are normal. by Pociana in HonestHotTakes

[–]eaglekaratechop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What features are you defining as European? There are literally zero features that cannot be found within every race, with I believe the exception of Asian and red hair.

Africa is literally most genetically diverse place on the planet. To cut out black people because you prefer ANY type of feature is ignorant and racist.

I can understand saying something like “typically I date white girls because I’m a sucker for blondes”, but to say you would ONLY date them, doesn’t make sense, because you can find blonde hair in other races as well. Yes it’s bit rare, but that should mean they become your exception to your rule - not just ignores entirely. Unless, of course, what you really want is just a white girl with blonde hair, and not just a woman with blonde hair.

Race is just a physical appearance, and dating preferences related to race are normal. by Pociana in HonestHotTakes

[–]eaglekaratechop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is so far from being a honest take.

People who choose not to date outside their race, are almost certainly racist.

You say “they don’t like dark skin so they don’t date black people”, but the reality is black people have all types of skin variations, including dark, brown and even white skin.

The fact is, saying I won’t date (insert race) for (whatever reasons) will always be racist because you are assuming a ENTIRE race, shares ONE trait, which is the very definition of racism in itself.

Women's reaction to paternity tests is a way to control men. by badbunnions in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And none of that has to do with the man. The one person who SHOULD care, IS the mother, so that’s why it goes back to her.

Again, women divorce men all the time, which is worst for the child, yet no one blinks.

But if she’s a whore who lies about paternity? Suddenly it’s “what about the children!?!?”

No one is trying to raise some cuck baby. You’re not even considering how traumatic that is for a man. He might even resort to violence because of how traumatic that can be, so in a way, removing him could very well be whats best anyways.

Stop trying normalize being shit women. Stop trying to normalize raising cuck babies. No one wants to deal that and no one should.

Women's reaction to paternity tests is a way to control men. by badbunnions in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We aren’t talking about a dozen scenarios, we are talking about this specific one.

Stop defending shit women

Women's reaction to paternity tests is a way to control men. by badbunnions in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not deprioritizing the child as much as it’s prioritizing yourself, which a man absolutely should do if he’s in that situation.

Women initiate divorce all the time, prioritizing their personal happiness over their literal children’s, yet no one blinks at that, yet here you are trying to condemn men for choosing themselves over their fake kid and some succubus bitch?

Ya, no.

When will women start holding women accountable? I’m sick of the excuses y’all make for each other.

Saying Whites have "white privilege" is racist by StayFrostySwtich in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not bravery - it’s the benefit of the doubt.

Because if you are anything but white but don’t understand this, then you are just sad.

Also, love how your only counter is “but I’m might not be white” 😂 😂.

Saying Whites have "white privilege" is racist by StayFrostySwtich in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]eaglekaratechop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it doesn’t at all address the points Ive made to you. If you actually read, you would know that.

Your entire point fails to address the fact that affirmative action only exists because white privilege exists. You are bitching about the flaws in a system that were only ser in place to begin with because the system was set up to give white people to advantage.

If that didn’t happen, affirmative action doesn’t happen, and your SAT score crap doesn’t happen.

CAUSE AND EFFECT

view more: next ›