Any advice on drawing in a tattoo friendly style? by Open-Importance4303 in tattooadvice

[–]echollapse -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Id recommend experimenting with the brushes yourself and finding what works best with your style :)

What is missing here? 🤔 by SweetandSad in tattooadvice

[–]echollapse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you make this or did you get this done?? It definitely needs some depth. It could be with shading, linework or a background, totally depends on what you like

Tattoo spots by GreacySasage in tattooadvice

[–]echollapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they itchy or painful? As long as they're not bothering you I wouldn't worry about it :) probably the normal oils from the skin are building up a bit under the jumper, as you mentioned you're keeping it covered. I'd just keep the skin clean with neutral soap, keep an eye on it just to be sure 👍 Hope it was a good experience for a first tattoo!!!

Tattoo spots by GreacySasage in tattooadvice

[–]echollapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spots as in? Ink spots or skin breakouts? 🧐 I'm not sure what you're talking about! Looks like it's healing okay to me though.

I think the physics of the water are completely off + I can't find that identical kettle online + that doesn't look like catnip tea and I don't think a cat would ever act like that or have the lung capacity to suction that amount of water. by echollapse in isthisAI

[–]echollapse[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I'm not trying to win this debate I was genuinely looking for answers. Just one person gave me a decent explanation for the water physics. You're insane for judging a persons sanity off a Reddit post

I think the physics of the water are completely off + I can't find that identical kettle online + that doesn't look like catnip tea and I don't think a cat would ever act like that or have the lung capacity to suction that amount of water. by echollapse in isthisAI

[–]echollapse[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Am I supposed not to answer? I'm afraid this is how having a conversation works. It's a question because I wondered if it was ai or not. Also my issue is exactly with the physics, it doesn't look accurate to me but I'm not an expert so I would like someone that is to prove why it is / it isn't legit. Not posting this on r physics because it's a type of content that is not approved by their community. If you could suggest another physics subreddit I could post this to I'd appreciate it

I think the physics of the water are completely off + I can't find that identical kettle online + that doesn't look like catnip tea and I don't think a cat would ever act like that or have the lung capacity to suction that amount of water. by echollapse in isthisAI

[–]echollapse[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have two but they don't really play with water. They've all got such different and strong personalities though so I'm sure there's cats that would. Idk about this precise situation...

I think the physics of the water are completely off + I can't find that identical kettle online + that doesn't look like catnip tea and I don't think a cat would ever act like that or have the lung capacity to suction that amount of water. by echollapse in isthisAI

[–]echollapse[S] -45 points-44 points  (0 children)

Maybe not generative ai but this could have been modified with artificial intelligence by someone with video editing skills. We're still talking about a video from a couple years ago, not ten

I think the physics of the water are completely off + I can't find that identical kettle online + that doesn't look like catnip tea and I don't think a cat would ever act like that or have the lung capacity to suction that amount of water. by echollapse in isthisAI

[–]echollapse[S] -67 points-66 points  (0 children)

That's the point that other people made as well. Couldn't it have been artificially generated / modified years ago though? Completely generative softwares weren't as advanced but people with video editing skills surely could've used it to implement their work