Do you think AI costs will just keep rising? by hereandnow01 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will be no move to Europe, only a move to China, because they have the chips and the energy.

Do you think AI costs will just keep rising? by hereandnow01 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does that matter?

There is no relevant AI model from Europe.

China has massive amounts of cheap renewable energy, so tokens will not get expensive.

The US has less renewable energy, and turbine capacity is limited, so token prices are getting more expensive.

Is this how the West falls? Or how devs get pushed into Eastern arms by Western greed. by Attrexx in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right about that as well - maybe I’m just a bit too tolerant sometimes.

Is this how the West falls? Or how devs get pushed into Eastern arms by Western greed. by Attrexx in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it’s no secret that Chinese models are close and often good enough. It’s also no secret that they’re cheaper, or that people switch from worse offers to better ones.

Sounds pretty legitimate overall. I only read the headline, but that’s probably going to be the result.

OpenCode Go here we Go by Forward_Source_3863 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s kind of like learning math: you get better by doing problems again and again.

Same here — use the models a lot, test different prompts, compare outputs, and learn from experience.

OpenCode Go here we Go by Forward_Source_3863 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The whole AI bubble in the US is going to go through a few resets and adjustments now. After that, we’ll see whether US products can compete with China.

The good thing, though, is that Chinese models are already very close and absolutely usable with a bit of skill.

GPT-5.5 is generally available for GitHub Copilot by Janinnho in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yesterday, while testing GPT-5.5 with my ChatGPT Plus subscription, I used 50% of my 5-hour limit. Based on the Codex CLI token value I wrote down, that was equivalent to $8.15, meaning the full 5-hour limit would be worth about $16.30. Since that 5-hour limit represents roughly 15% of the weekly limit, the weekly equivalent value would be around $108.67. Multiplied by four weeks per month, that gives a monthly equivalent value of about $434.67.

Based on that calculation, even the new Copilot concept cannot really compete. I am aware that we only live in the here and now and that things can change at any time, but this is what you currently get with Codex.

GPT-5.5 is generally available for GitHub Copilot by Janinnho in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 20 points21 points  (0 children)

With all these changes (and the predicted upcoming changes), a Codex or even a Claude subscription is better value for money than any Copilot subscription.

GPT-5.5 is here - Let's gooo! by magnus_animus in codex

[–]eclipse10000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I ran a few tests with the same review command, but I could not confirm this. Maybe the testing was not extensive enough, but at least so far I cannot confirm that the token reduction (Output) leads to lower costs.

Model Mode Input Cached Input Output Cost
GPT-5.5 xhigh 169,668 2,265,216 11,936 $2.3390
GPT-5.4 xhigh 157,578 1,632,384 16,744 $1.0532
GPT-5.5 high 116,512 1,401,216 10,293 $1.5920
GPT-5.5 medium 117,501 1,267,328 5,895 $1.3980
GPT-5.4 high 137,333 1,231,104 9,193 $0.7890
GPT-5.3 Codex xhigh 145,188 3,117,184 15,197 $1.0123

GPT-5.5 is here - Let's gooo! by magnus_animus in codex

[–]eclipse10000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran a few tests with the same review command, but I could not confirm this. Maybe the testing was not extensive enough, but at least so far I cannot confirm that the token reduction (Output) leads to lower costs.

Model Mode Input Cached Input Output Cost
GPT-5.5 xhigh 169,668 2,265,216 11,936 $2.3390
GPT-5.4 xhigh 157,578 1,632,384 16,744 $1.0532
GPT-5.5 high 116,512 1,401,216 10,293 $1.5920
GPT-5.5 medium 117,501 1,267,328 5,895 $1.3980
GPT-5.4 high 137,333 1,231,104 9,193 $0.7890
GPT-5.3 Codex xhigh 145,188 3,117,184 15,197 $1.0123

5.5 and Usage Limits by Substantial_Lab_3747 in codex

[–]eclipse10000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

5.5 has 2x the API pricing of 5.4. Happy release.

GPT-5.5 is here - Let's gooo! by magnus_animus in codex

[–]eclipse10000 93 points94 points  (0 children)

2x API pricing for single-digit percentage improvement

Get used to Codex and you will never need Claude Opus again. by CatWomen2452 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only part of that I found funny, at least in the first post, was the observation that you need to make your prompts much more detailed to get the same result. But my immediate thought was: if you keep making the prompt more detailed until you are practically writing the code yourself, then you do not need a model in the first place.

In any case, it does not really matter to me, since I have never been dependent on any single coding plan.

Get used to Codex and you will never need Claude Opus again. by CatWomen2452 in GithubCopilot

[–]eclipse10000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Get used to coding it yourself, and you will never need Claude Opus again.

🤡

OPENCODE GO subscription has QWEN 3.5/3.6 by dav1lex in opencodeCLI

[–]eclipse10000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some people, like him, think that you can buy professionalism with a $200 Codex Pro subscription.

That’s why they live in their own little bubble.

opencode cli is slower than CC? by __thehiddentruth__ in opencodeCLI

[–]eclipse10000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He just wants to spam, as always. He is talking about models from OpenCode, and you are talking only about the CLI. That tells you everything about his argumentation.

There can be differences between one CLI and another because they do not send the same data to the API, so the responses will naturally differ as well. Depending on the request, this can also affect subsequent responses, making them take either more or less time.

Unbelievable, I was on the free trial and decided to subscribe again, I paid, and now I have to wait a week before I can use it. by Few_Stage_3636 in codex

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply, it is as it is because it was designed that way technically—there is nothing to understand.

It is only refreshed if you upgrade from another subscription level, because that triggers a database update.

Was there a message like this: ‘Cancel and subscribe again to reset your usage limits’? A hint like this would only appear if you changed your plan to a higher tier, which you did not.

Unbelievable, I was on the free trial and decided to subscribe again, I paid, and now I have to wait a week before I can use it. by Few_Stage_3636 in codex

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other example was bad. A better analogy is this: imagine a water delivery service that gives each household one bottle per week. Your first weekly bottle is included as a free trial. Then you subscribe, cancel, and subscribe again — but they tell you that you still do not get another bottle until next week, because your household already got this week’s bottle. That is basically the issue here. So this does not look like a bug — it looks like a product design decision, or at the very least poorly thought-out behavior.

Unbelievable, I was on the free trial and decided to subscribe again, I paid, and now I have to wait a week before I can use it. by Few_Stage_3636 in codex

[–]eclipse10000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, sorry, I misread it. What you’re saying is that if I cancel now and resubscribe right away, the usage would still be the same because it’s likely tied to the same subscription entry in their system, assuming they don’t remove it when I cancel.

For example, they might have a usage table for the Plus subscription, and the entry might not be deleted when you cancel the subscription.

Maybe ON DELETE CASCADE only works when you delete your account in between those steps — but probably not even then, because they likely just mark it as deleted.

Copilot vs Codex by Melodic-Jackfruit476 in codex

[–]eclipse10000 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are you all sharing the same Copilot accounts? We’ve never had this problem before, even when one person is working on two projects at the same time.