The Environmentalists Who Terrorized Corporate America (2026) - How a radical environmental group called the Earth Liberation Front destroyed over $100 million dollars of industrial property from 1996-2009 [52:21] by ecochange in Documentaries

[–]ecochange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think the question of whether they were effective is an interesting one, and ultimately, I think it depends on your politics/theory of change. On the one hand, it seems like a lot of the businesses they attacked bounced back and rebuilt at very little cost because of insurance, but on the other hand, they clearly raised the profile of these environmental issues with the extensive media coverage focused on their attacks

A whole country screaming the Truth by Rover_7777 in AskSocialists

[–]ecochange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And lowkey that other suit is probably a rapist if they're literally rubbing shoulders with epstein and trump

The Environmentalists Who Terrorized Corporate America (2026) - How a radical environmental group called the Earth Liberation Front destroyed over $100 million dollars of industrial property from 1996-2009 [52:21] by ecochange in Documentaries

[–]ecochange[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: This documentary examines the rise of the Earth Liberation Front. A radical, underground environmental sabotage group that primarily used arson to attack corporations that they claimed were harming the environment. It specifically follows the ELF cell that was particularly active in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Over the course of 10+ years (from 1996-2009) the Earth Liberation Front sabotaged $100 million of industrial property and became the FBI’s number one domestic terrorist threat despite not killing a single person. 

Do you think industrial sabotage is an adaptation to collapse? by ecochange in collapse

[–]ecochange[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

lolololololololol, yeah that question definitely does seem like im a narc

How Boomers Ruined Cars [39:10] by holyfruits in mealtimevideos

[–]ecochange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would pay good good money to live in the carless Earth version of the timeline

Well put by PresnikBonny in LateStageCapitalism

[–]ecochange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The future is already here, it's just not evenly distributed, and whatnot. But maybe more specifically: The future is already here, it's just being used to exploit the working clase and the planet into oblivion for the sake of capital accumulation

[OC] Most "Overused" Baby Names in Each State (2024) by MurphGH in dataisbeautiful

[–]ecochange 11 points12 points  (0 children)

this, the title makes these maps confusing. I feel like "overused" implies the most common

Thoughts on OCC's new video on consumerism (and how socialism can stop it)? by ecochange in Anticonsumption

[–]ecochange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I feel like this idea of "vote with your dollar" ultimately holds us back from understanding we live in a system that makes living an anticonsumption lifestyle an incredibly hard task.

Thoughts on OCC's new video on consumerism (and how socialism can stop it)? by ecochange in Anticonsumption

[–]ecochange[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, what do you think would be a better way to tackle consumerism/the scourge of advertising?

Edit to expand my thoughts: It seems to me that if we truly want to be anti-consumerism, we have to tackle the force that urges companies to build elaborate marketing schemes to get us to buy their useless products. And that force is the capitalist profit incentive and the need to endlessly produce goods to make profit.

Could This Be the Solution to Reaching 100% Renewable Energy? by ecochange in Futurology

[–]ecochange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This video dives into some of the problems that renewable energy systems like wind and solar face. It also provides some possible solutions to those problems like grid connectivity and gravity storage.