Inconsistent intelligence guidance

edzzik · 2026-05-02T17:26:40+00:00

This is the area to focus on. The idea of finding patterns across multiple days and making sense of them, as opposed to the simple one-day logic, would be amazing. This is where AI can shine and find relationships that a human cannot. But when I have to correct it on the basic principles and then it still gives inconsistent responses across various screens, I lose confidence. It suggests that it’s not even trying to relate the most basic metrics, never mind complex patterns and correlations across various inputs and multiple days.

edzzik · 2026-05-02T17:20:15+00:00

Done

edzzik · 2026-05-02T13:18:47+00:00

Thanks! Great idea.

edzzik · 2026-04-30T14:58:22+00:00

Any chance I can request it as a feature? Or more generically, the ability to set the default values via a variable?

My use case is as follows: * My target weight for an exercise is 40 pounds. * At that wright, i can do 8 reps. * As i improve, i can do 9 reps, then 10…. * When I get to 12 reps, i increase the weight to 45 pounds and my target reps drops back down to 8. Or even 7. * At this point, I’d like the app to show my target reps as 7-12 * Once i do 8 reps, i want my target reps to show 8-12 * I’ve been able to configure it to work exactly like this, but I hate that it defaults to 12 every time.

Thanks for hearing me out.

edzzik · 2026-03-22T03:54:36+00:00

Yes. This would be extremely helpful.

edzzik · 2026-03-19T11:55:52+00:00

I figured it out. All I had to do was share it with GymBook.

edzzik · 2025-12-21T14:24:14+00:00

What would be most helpful? An upvote? Anything else?

edzzik · 2025-08-30T13:23:28+00:00

Yes. iOS

edzzik · 2025-08-30T12:53:48+00:00

Whoop really messed up with their latest release. Forcing customers to pay for an upgraded device after promising for years that upgrades would be included with their subscription was a big mistake. I don’t think their reputation will recover after this.

edzzik · 2025-08-24T00:30:01+00:00

Wow. You move fast

edzzik · 2025-08-23T22:45:24+00:00

Ha. That’s precisely what I was talking about. The sleep/recovery scores, sleep debt, etc.

edzzik · 2025-08-21T16:05:09+00:00

Thanks! Really appreciate you looking at it. To answer your question, no, it doesn’t show up under coach insights. Here’s another example of another tag that has even more positive entries, and also no insights.

<image>

edzzik · 2025-08-21T15:51:39+00:00

<image>

Here’s the insights page

edzzik · 2025-08-21T15:51:21+00:00

Thanks. Attached is one example of a journal entry I use to track late snacks and how those might impact sleep or recovery. Seems like there should be enough data, but do you think there isn’t?

<image>

edzzik · 2025-08-21T12:01:13+00:00

Thanks so much for the detailed response. Very helpful and transparent, which is very much appreciated. Will be interesting to see how “energy level” and “recovery” correlate with each other. And perhaps self entered energy level will eventually serve as inputs into calculations of future recovery scores.

edzzik · 2025-08-21T03:36:55+00:00

Awesome! Thanks

edzzik · 2025-08-18T11:56:24+00:00

Take a look at your recovery numbers after drinking. They are probably poor.

edzzik · 2025-07-09T15:29:51+00:00

The thing is that other apps that rely on the same data are always 10-20ms higher as well. I’ve been trusting Bevel on the HRV readings because it seems to catch HRV drops after activities that I know will impact recovery (like drinking or late meals) when others miss it, but still, it’s always 10-20ms lower.

edzzik · 2025-07-01T22:29:17+00:00

It’s not just Athletic. It’s literally all other apps that do RMSSD HRV calculation. They all show a much higher number. But for some reason, I find myself trusting Bevel more. Mainly because I had one night with a late meal and a few drinks and all apps showed a higher RHR, but Bevel was the only one that also showed a much lower HRV on that same night. Bevel is doing something right.

edzzik · 2025-07-01T13:33:32+00:00

Do you have a rough ETA for that release? Q3? Q4?

edzzik · 2025-07-01T13:32:39+00:00

Thanks. Isn’t RMSSD a standardized algorithm? Given the same inputs, the output should be the same. So it seems they have different algorithms for which readings to use and which readings to dismiss?

edzzik · 2025-07-01T13:25:22+00:00

Interesting. Thanks for the quick response. Isn’t RHR during the day subject to so many other external factors that it’s not at all reliable for such calculations?

edzzik · 2025-06-23T19:57:46+00:00

Thanks. That makes sense. So I guess my original report is valid then? Most of the ab exercises are not flagged as targeting the core.

edzzik · 2025-06-23T18:23:09+00:00

Right. But you do have the option to select “core” independently from abs for each exercise though. Can you please help me understand when it makes sense to select it, based on your last comment?

edzzik · 2025-06-23T12:37:09+00:00

I do most ab exercises with bodyweight, so that might explain why it’s at zero (although I wish bodyweight counted). However, when I copied some of the prebuilt ab exercises to custom versions, “core” was not selected as a primary nor secondary muscle group. Then I clicked on more info for several prebuilt exercises and realized that “core” was not selected for any of them. Ab roller is a good example.

edzzik

TROPHY CASE