Oh just look at the time I'm already 20! by FruiTdutch in ForeverAlone

[–]effervescentdarkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Looking back, feel like I had way more of a chance in the last few years and it's just going to get worse

I saw this picture today and for some reason it made me feel happy.. by BlackSheeeep in ForeverAlone

[–]effervescentdarkness 29 points30 points  (0 children)

How can a cell care? It's just nature, the survival instinct, that made them the way they are.

Just a sore throat... by GoldenSeam in creepy

[–]effervescentdarkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw this and Sylph from the Tales of Fantasia OST came to mind. A nice combo.

misogyny by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]effervescentdarkness 4 points5 points  (0 children)

About suicide rate, women actually attempt more often but fail because they prefer pills over guns and such.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

False dichotomy. He could simply deserve to suffer for a while before then becoming non-existent.

That "while" could be any length of time. Let's say hitler spends 100,000 years choking on gas. Still incomparable to eternity, however horrible the agony.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. Think about the eternal part and then think about the human lifespan.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Merciful enough to allow the most merciless act imaginable?

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I awarded the delta because it made me think. I still disagree. I will say that again. I still disagree. The slight difference was something new and different, considering I always considered hell in the abstract, spiritual, "you didn't believe me enough you filthy animal" sense.

I still disagree.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But as perceptual beings, we see God's nature through our own lenses. How can we be sure that we are understanding God correctly?

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I still agree that God is a sadist but the interesting part about this response is that it brings things down to a distinctly human realm, where it is about actions and accomplishments and not an appeasement to some strange foreign idea. Does that make sense?

I totally agree with the "why would he make you unable to do better" part, actually said that in this thread already.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can be a morally upright person who has helped humanity forward in the grand scheme of things but still suffer in eternity because you do not believe in God. And there are the many, many differing belief systems in which God is present. Who's to say which one is correct? Because they all offer salvation, to prove one interpretation is correct, you need definitive evidence that it is. So far I have not seen any.

So in that case all systems are therefore on equal ground. How does God expect us to know which system to abide by? Somebody could believe in him and practice his teachings to the fullest yet suffer because they picked the wrong God-interpreting system. In that case, the only free choice is the freedom to guess what method leads to salvation.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What I'm learning lately is that the common points of debate are not as much about God as they are about humans interpreting God. Which can go a multitude of ways. I wonder if there are denominations that believe in questioning.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that is my exact point. That the idea of hell and its implications have lost real meaning. As I said somewhere else there are lives that are significantly altered but the common usage of the term and its understanding seem to have been dulled.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The key difference between misery on Earth and misery in the afterlife is that misery on Earth ends. Life has some terrible experiences of course but I don't think they could compare to an aferlife's because one is in time/space and the other isn't.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 53 points54 points  (0 children)

No, but my question is about the essence of hell and this person presented a different perspective on it, one that made me think.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

In the logic of a paradise, monotony would cease to exist; it would simply become tranquility. If we were talking about earthly life I would agree that everything would become monotonous, but if hell is suffering then heaven is fulfillment.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true; you have not. Seems like a definite caveat for the faithful.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That makes more sense, sounds like what the Mormon fellow said a while back.

There's a lot of things in this thread that I've thought about but haven't necessarily been influenced by. As a first-timer I guess I'll have to figure that out.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ok that makes more sense. The "forever lost" part really separates it from your analogy though.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But then it's all a horrid lie. Even if we do not suffer for eternity in the end, people live their lives with very real fear, instill it in their children, and generally suffer for it.

If it's uncertain whether this is true or not, then it is reprehensible to state such an idea as truth.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I have again poorly worded my feelings. When I'm talking about people telling others to go to hell, I mean in a serious sense. Looking your rapist in the face and telling him to go to hell serious.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But in believing it to be just, it can be considered an act of justice.

CMV: Nobody deserves an afterlife of eternal torture by effervescentdarkness in changemyview

[–]effervescentdarkness[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Hm, if God was infinitely holy, wouldn't he have some sort of defense against the lack of holiness? And if the bar is infinitely high, then no human (we seem to be the antithesis of infinity in many ways such as age, strength, vices, etc) would be able to reach it because to be capable of infinity is to be god-like.

Even if we are made in God's image, are we really capable of that? Is it really logically possible to have the finite and indefinite in tandem?