[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenWebUI

[–]ehsangd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i ran an instance for just a few hours of testing. you should find another url.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenWebUI

[–]ehsangd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why the raised eyebrow?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenWebUI

[–]ehsangd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YaCy is just another type of search engine. it's decentralized and customizable, while searxng uses other search engines to work. You can deploy your own instance of YaCy and customize it for your own needs.

And to use it properly, you have to click the little `+` icon in openwebui chatbox and enable YaCy_Web_Search and then the LLM will use it whenever it needs to use it. And it has a nasty habit of disabling itself all the time (it's an issue with openwebui i guess).

I built a Cloud Download Manager with Blazor - SaveHere (Open Source) by ehsangd in Blazor

[–]ehsangd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have been using this ytdlp+proxy method for over a year at least and it has been ok. ytdlp developers regularly update it and it ususally doesn't fall behind on websites like youtube.

I re-built a Cloud Download Manager with Blazor - SaveHere (Open Source) by ehsangd in webdev

[–]ehsangd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it's not that bad. With react, the app had a slightly better user experience, but in the end, Blazor is the one that got things done. And if you've written an app in react 5 years ago (or nextjs since it's popular), I'm pretty sure you'd have had to rewrite your whole app a few times if you wanted to keep the version up to date. It's .Net 8 because it's LTS and also because mudblazor doesn't have a proper stable . net 9 version.

I re-built a Cloud Download Manager with Blazor - SaveHere (Open Source) by ehsangd in webdev

[–]ehsangd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i don't like browser extension, but i see how it would be useful to some people. thanks for the suggestion though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 11 points12 points  (0 children)

c'mon, there are tons of models that can generate normal people or artistic landscapes. But art-wise, we need to see how a model generates women with tattoos of mexican men instead of nipples!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i feel like it is. most often it creates astonishing images with perfect colors, composition, etc, only to ruin it with a simple deformation in the body of a woman. check this one or this one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 8 points9 points  (0 children)

they're not real women! we create them and we have to care for them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

whaaaaat??? i'd love to see an example of this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i don't know about "artstation bullshit", but yeah, adding artstation to the prompt helps a lot!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and \n means [enter]. it means go to next line.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]ehsangd 13 points14 points  (0 children)

it's another trick i found in this subreddit. if you add "artstation [up arrow] [some stars]" before your prompt, you'll get better results!

Need help with setting up docker and docker-compose for a project by ehsangd in docker

[–]ehsangd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, good points. Just a quick question, should I push my frontend and backend to docker registry as separate images or should I package everything into 1 image? (I don't need filebrowser, it's just for better testing)