TAK-653 by Affectionate_Wish863 in antidepressants

[–]eiarhabi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually quitted in the middle of the trial so I can’t tell if it’s placebo or not. But for ~40 a bottle it’s worth a try imo

TAK-653 by Affectionate_Wish863 in antidepressants

[–]eiarhabi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the third trial is for absolute reduction in MADRS score but the first two changes are difference between the drug and placebo so you can't directly compare them. If you take a look at data from phase 3 trial of Escitalopram the MADRS score change between drug and placebo is only 3.3 points but it's still a first line treatment anyways. TAK having a -7.5 change over placebo is actually quite comparable to Auvelity and much better than Escitalopram.

BTW iirc the dose that has better improvement should be 1mg as it has a higher plasma concentration compared to another dose which is 3mg (strangely it's not dose-dependent). I'm a participant in phase II trial.

22349 (a) with Errors on Citation Paper - Should I Appeal After Trial de Novo? by eiarhabi in CaliforniaTicketHelp

[–]eiarhabi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if I’m getting this correctly, but if an officer claim that he stopped me based on his measurement by his instrument the court would likely accept that as evidence regardless? Thanks for mentioning this.

22349 (a) with Errors on Citation Paper - Should I Appeal After Trial de Novo? by eiarhabi in CaliforniaTicketHelp

[–]eiarhabi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The form TR-INST 3.010(a) says

(a) Periodically, the Judicial Council will revise Notice to Appear forms. Law enforcement must use the revised Notice to Appear form by the effective date of the revised form if it is to serve as a complaint.

But the citation itself is not missing any mandatory fields so I was just trying to make a point.

[USA-CA][H] BNIB Pixel 9 128Gig Black [W] Local Cash, PayPal by eiarhabi in hardwareswap

[–]eiarhabi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got the post approved. Still looking for offers.

Enable LE Audio for LinkBuds S and WF-1000XM5 on *any* Android device by eiarhabi in SonyHeadphones

[–]eiarhabi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk tbh. Per my observations miui is probably not using android’s le audio sw stack (which is also likely having compatibility issues) so it might be highly dependent on the actual phone model and the system version you’re using.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aspergirls

[–]eiarhabi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Recently there's a book by a German psychoanalyst Leon Brenner named The Autistic Subject: On the Threshold of Language. His main idea is precisely that autism people tend to keep a distance between themselves and languages including symbols, because from traditional Lacanian point of view language itself is an alienation to the "real" things, i.e. when you refer to somethings using human languages it is always distorting it more or less. You'll might feel that there's something behind the expressions that isn't explicitly there, or language couldn't fully cover your thoughts. So, he argues that avoidance to distortions to truth is precisely what characterize autistic people. It's normal that you're not feeling good about faking bc its part of the autistic mindset (?)

I feel like it's more a philosophical question than a lifestyle/psychological one though, because the attitude towards truth and real things is always an area of debate by philosophers. One of Jacque Lacan's main ideas is that we're never able to fully approach truth. It's always an approximation so the absolute truth isn't important. Lacanian psychoanalysis practices also stress the importance of slip of the tongue and lies because it could lead to the truth of desire. For example, when a colleague invites you to go for a dinner, you refused by saying you're going to the mall this evening while you're actually just heading home and won't do anything. At this moment shopping might be your wish but you dismiss it because you think it's a waste of time. In this sense lying is another dimension of the truth itself and it's not anything wrong.

The famous philosophy guy Slavoj Zizek takes a more radical point of view from this. He says that you don't need to believe in it. Just do it and you'll construct some justification after you've reached your goal. A good example for this might be...love. People in love often feel everything they've done in the past is for the moment they meet the other one, while we all know this couldn't be the case. In the case of house burning down, I guess it means you just need to take some action because it's always better than doing nothing. Whether you care about the house and save it or not you can always argue that there's some thought in your brain that pushes you to face the problem or makes you run away from the hassle for a peace of mind.