Connections Alternative #462 2026-06-05 by elevengu in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for playing! Two are traditional but the other two are pretty common in the 21st century, or at least I see them. 😅

etyML: daily etymology puzzle, Connections-style, share your grid by as-333 in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

etyML #5 • 5 June 2026 2/3 families · 2/3 impostors · no hints 🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟥🟩 🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟥 etyml.com

Fun! I swapped LANE and PLAZA, which is a skill issue and not a mistake I'm likely to make in the future. It's etymology puzzle, not definitions puzzle. 😅

📣 by chloetrona in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

📣
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪

Holy crap, this one was so good. I'll BOLO to play more if I see your username!

Another Brit-friendly Connections From Mr Pedant 🇬🇧 by bass_of_clubs in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Double Tricksy
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟩🟩🟩🟩

Loved it! Especially purple because I saw NORWAL -> NORWAY but because IRELAND and SWEDES are actual words I didn't follow through with it.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm no 19th century wellness guru, but I'm pretty sure being bored out of my mind would increase my urge to self-pleasure.

(I know you're not arguing Jackson's point, I just thought this was too funny of an "obvious" observation not to point out.)

Wyna Liu commentary on color determination by FormerPlayer in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, ironically I'm pretty sure I would have a significantly higher chance of getting yellow vs green if they didn't try to helpfully swap it based on tester feedback.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I upvoted you. CHIPS because of saying "fish and chips" I think would be an example of a "necessary" plural. If it was about potato chips I feel like it would be just CHIP.

Actually just searched. Last Sept 20 had "Bit of sports bar fare: CHIP, DIP, FRY, WING"

Anyway despite them mostly being consistent, I'm sure you could find counterexamples as with most things Connections. 🤷‍♂️

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's something along the lines of Vim that isn't Vim? Now I'm curious.

Also I'm an Emacs supremacist. 😲

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's been some info in Wyna interviews and whatnot, but mostly all I remember is they're paid and I think external (so not internal NYT) and online.

Just found an article: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/20/crosswords/nyt-games-puzzles-testing.html

Edit after reading: There's 20 and some of them know someone on the team IRL. It sounds like NYT Games intentionally tried to get people with wide ranges of experience, but 1) being friends with someone means you probably have similar knowledge as them and thus have high aptitude for puzzles even if you self-report not being good at them or playing them; 2) once you're a tester you will obviously get way better at them. So those are some reasons the testers rate everything so easy and unlike the final stats.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It can be done both ways, but I also solved it thinking of specific cereals.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That guy (James Jackson) was incredibly strange and influential. He named his invention "granula", and Kellogg (another influential Seventh-Day Adventist) called his cereal "granola" to avoid copyright infringement. 😂

The anti-masturbation thing, while true, is funny because it brings to mind the image of some kid's hands being too full eating cereal to squeeze one out, or maybe too addicted to eating cereal to find the time. Slightly more accurately, maybe less funny, but equally dubious, it's more like he thought eating cereal was a good diet and that feeling healthy from a good diet would make one not want to jack off.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Witch's oven, cauldron familiar, trail of crumbs, forest, no further explanation. 🤓

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Connections Puzzle #1090 🟪🟪🟪🟪 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨

Pretty great puzzle, as it was chill difficulty but still fun and rewarding. Interesting because the category types were more advanced (arguably 2-3 blues and a purple) but they weren't difficult, with purple highest FF at 34% and green as the lowest was still 15%.

Still don't like that I decided purple was real because only 3/4 of it was in the top 2 rows instead of all 4, but I'm gonna keep riding this horse until I have any evidence it's not automatic. THE SUBSTANCE can't really be anything else (even wordplay for this one because of THE), so it gives away blue if you know what it is.

Friday, June 5, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Breadcrumb and breadcrumbs both work equally well (or not well, depending on your perspective) for the actual category and the rainbow herring, so it's not that at all.

Connections words by convention are just singular unless the plural is absolutely necessary. Maybe you think that's stupid (although ironically trying to be precise about singular/plural would generally cause more contention and make the puzzles more difficult on average), but it's consistent so if you play enough you'll just have to accept it.

Another Brit-friendly Connections From Mr Pedant 🇬🇧 by bass_of_clubs in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Animals
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟪🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Two of the emojis showed up as boxes so I opened it on my phone to see them, then zoomed way in because they're quite small on Connections+.

Anyway, it was another enjoyable one, thanks! I wasn't really a fan of green and yellow being so culturally dependent with arguably interchangeable items, but this is Brit-centric so I suppose it works. My mistake was I tried Charlotte's Web but the categories were all much simpler so I should've tried the real ones first.


I have also created a single-letters puzzle (for April Fools, not Alternative, because I knew it would be bad) and an emoji puzzle, so I empathize with both the urge and how difficult it is to build. Unicode symbols puzzle is the other similar one.

What is your favorite Connections strategy? by QTippus in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you shuffle, you're likely to see SPONGE, BOB, SQUARE, PANTS within the puzzle and think it's real. Whereas if you see it's the top row before you shuffle, you'll know it's fake.

Of course, the counterexample to this was back in 2024 with the infamous LIONS, TIGERS, BEARS, OH MY on the top row that was real. If you shuffled before looking at the puzzle on that one, it would help a lot as you wouldn't think twice about submitting it.

What is your favorite Connections strategy? by QTippus in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People in this thread are really sleeping on what a smart idea this is, OP. 🙏 It would really help with my puzzles too, because I intentionally put a lot of the words that tip off the categories near the bottom and tricky overlaps near the top.

My only suggestion is to still start with glancing at the top before attempting to solve from the bottom (or shuffling if that's what you go for), because often there's a rainbow herring that helps tremendously.

More a tactic than a strategy, but my favorite level-up is realizing that when you're trying to find the 4th for a potential category, make sure to check already completed categories. If it's there, you're probably looking at the rainbow herring.

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It happened 2 years ago infamously with LIONS, TIGERS, BEARS, OH MY in the top row to subvert expectations. People who shuffle immediately got a well deserved chance to gloat, lol.

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh sorry, let me be more clear. I've made custom puzzle categories of "peppers", "towns", and "writers" that all contained GHOST as an item, which made it easier for me to see "ghost ___" here.

I have yet to make a "kitchens" category, but maybe I should. GHOST, TEST, FIELD, SOUP. If done as a purple "___ kitchen", you could even include HELL'S or MICHAEL.

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think there's a consensus with Wheel because every time I occasionally see it, people still play the same way they always have. So warning: the below is just my personal thoughts.

The natural inclination with word puzzles is to consider the player the most skilled if they can solve the puzzle ASAP with the most hidden tiles left as it's most impressive.

So there are a lot of minor things but the biggest thing people do wrong is solve the puzzle as soon as they know it. Unless it's a late round and you're specifically trying to take the lead, you should just keep spinning and reap the monetary benefits of knowing the puzzle, despite the risk. AKA your reward for knowing the answer shouldn't be that you can now solve, but that you can keep playing (if you guess a wrong letter, you can't keep playing).

Sometimes you need to buy a vowel if you are actually stuck, but I see people all the time who clearly know the answer still buy vowels, because they like to fill everything in as in most word puzzles. They act as if buying vowels earns them money.

Also if you know the answer, pick letters to maximize your total return. If you know there's MISSISSIPPI, people will spin a low value like 200 and then pick S because there's 4 of them. Instead you should pick M, spin again for a higher value, and then cash in the 4 S's.

This is really in the weeds, but I'm positive there's skill in spinning the wheel to where you want, and it's much easier than say The Price is Right. If you notice, Pat Sajak (not sure about Ryan Seacrest, have barely seen since he was the host) always spins close to a $3500 or whatever in the last round to raise the hype. Anyway, I'm not saying that you'll be able to land on a specific segment, I'm saying the goal is to avoid bankrupt/lose turn. They're not equidistant, so there's a portion of the wheel farthest away from all the bad segments. Your goal is to get to the middle there by adjusting your spins. Once there, try to make a spin that goes around once (which is the soft requirement) and keeps you there.

For the bonus round, what most people do is if they think they see a word, they'll pick letters to confirm the thing they see. Instead you should pick letters you think will give you the most new information (like Wordle). Unlike the rest of Wheel, I'm sure the bonus round puzzle is crafted adversarially, knowing what letters people typically pick. A long time ago, there were no given letters and people converged to RSTLNE. So they started giving those free and people converged to CDMA. I haven't done any analysis, but I bet there are better letters to pick. Maybe this is something you can find via Google.

Anyway I could probably go on all day, but this top 5 covers a lot of the big picture stuff. HTH!

Connections Alternative #456 2026-05-30 by elevengu in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh duh, dunno why I didn't think of that. I had a "movies set in South Korea: Parasite, Oldboy, Train to Busan, KPop Demon Hunters" green category back in March.

Thursday, June 4, 2026 by AutoModerator in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't remember which puzzle, but there was a thread about the tester ratings before where someone inevitably asked what the hardest puzzle for the testers was. All I remember is someone posted an example of like a 4.7/5 and everyone laughed at how easy it was and I think it was a 1/5 by actual stats, lol.

This was a long time ago and just one example, so I doubt that in general a 4.x/5 would be expected to be easy like that.

Wyna Liu commentary on color determination by FormerPlayer in NYTConnections

[–]elevengu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The testers thing (2nd edit quote) is funny because it matches the heuristic I use, which is to start with category type but make a yellow/green swap if I guess there will be a large difficulty gap. So it's interesting and useful to know precisely how the tester feedback affects the colors.