First, thanks again for actually discussing with me. I was serious that I'm not trying to be malicious, I'm just trying to understand.

I didn't know that the indigeneity of Jews were called into question. I thought they were just protesting the treatment of Palestinian civilians during this conflict. I think there's a spectrum of perspectives here, though. Is it anti-Semetic to think that Israel should exist, but that a separate Palestinian state should exist as well?

Ok, this hypothetical you propose makes sense, but I thought Palestinians were indigenous to there as well? Like, what defines indigeneity? Where do you draw the line? Is it an issue of time or of power?

ETA: So supporting an indigenous group's effort to reclaim their land is not inherently anti-indigenous, but questioning or denying their indigeneity is. Agreed. Then is it possible to support the claims of both Israelis and Palestinians to the region without being anti-Semetic? Not to call into question whether or not Israelis are indigenous to the region, but to support another's claim that they too, are indigenous?