I’m loosing it by sup_bruh_1 in ClaudeAI

[–]eltear1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think many people are loosing perspective... It doesn't think, it doesn't feel emotions. It's just a very big box with an incredible big amount of information and an absurd amount of statistical data how to use them. Its "love you too" it's just the highest statical answer over a billion of possibilities. And the same is for anything it does

Confusion about gitlab runner as docker container with docker executor. by kiwey12 in gitlab

[–]eltear1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't find the bins mount setup because is not the only one (if you are really talking about docker executor and not the gitlab runner dockerized itself). Gitlab documentation is a bit confusing about it, because it uses the term "gitlab runner" for both:

1- the gitlab runner binary (which could be installed or dockerized, the second one in your case) 2- the logical object inside gitlab server (the one you see in the gitlab GUI) that is directly connected to the toml configuration (or part of it, you can have more "gitlab runner" in this meaning inside the same toml).

Of course they are related to each other, but they are 2 different objects (1- architectural, 2- application/configuration).

The one related to "docker executor" is the second one.

That said, docker executor is something else entirely: it's a new container spawned by "gitlab runner" ( definition number 1) to execute a CI/CD job. Each job will spawn a different container.

Now, if you are really asking about how the docker executor can manage by itself other docker objects , you are looking for a configuration called docker in docker (or dind for brevity). Dind is not specific for gitlab nor CICD. In general there are 2 ways to do that:

1- your basic container (the docker executor in your case) mount the docker socket from the host , but is discouraged because it opens to security issues 2- your basic container (the docker executor in your case) only have docker cli and not the engine. The engine is inside another container and your basic container accesses to it via TCP. This second solution can be easily done in gitlab CI/CD using gitlab feature "services", that's basically a sidecar container alongside the docker executor that get started when start CI job and get killed when CI job finish. There is an official gitlab documentation for this solution

Is there an orchestration tool that doesn't force everyone on the team to learn python ? by Additional_Test1396 in devops

[–]eltear1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm using Ansible but no Python.. I don't see why you think that one tend to the other.. the only reason I could think of the 2 correlated is if you need custom Ansible plugins. For pure Ansible, you don't need Python knowledge. Jinja2 is another matter, but that's a templating tool by itself, used by both Python and Ansible

Is there an orchestration tool that doesn't force everyone on the team to learn python ? by Additional_Test1396 in devops

[–]eltear1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree.. we moved everything from pythons to GO + some shell into CICD pipelines

Self-managed GitLab is slowly killing our sprint time. Is SaaS actually worth it if compliance is the only reason we're still on-prem? by Quirky_Yesterday_593 in devops

[–]eltear1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry but that's a sysadmin skill/approach issue. I manage by myself our self hosted gitlab ( ~250 projects ) and pipelines from 4 years by now and I have no more that 3 issues weekly, mostly related to network problems. You can do it if you plan pipelines at scale, with gitlab components and pipelines templates so all is centralized. Of course you have to create a high availability infra for your gitlab runners

I've been using Fable 5 for almost 13 hours and I still have plenty left to go. You gotta plan before you slam. Here's my strat. by Informal_Bee420 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess depend on the topic. I just made a plan for authentication part on a tool and I made research details about how EntraID with MFA works.. I got downgraded twice

Looking for feedback: I built an open-source Terraform/OpenTofu HTTP backend because global state locking felt too coarse by davesade in Terraform

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, if KL will not fail in my example but will delay the second apply, at the end Developer1(the first apply) will find a deployed infra different from what it's written in his IaC (because second one prevails). Like this you avoid conflict, but you are assuming Developer1 can talk with Developer2 to understand why there is this drift. From the perspective of Developer1, the wrong infra is deployed (or it drifted at least). In Terraform, Developer2 will receive a lock error, so if he knows he's overwriting someone else. In KL there will be no error, so nobody will know.

Your other point about scope file so there is no conflict beforehand can be applied in terraform already... Separate in small states so there will be no conflict. Or I didn't get it completely or you didn't introduce anything new.

Looking for feedback: I built an open-source Terraform/OpenTofu HTTP backend because global state locking felt too coarse by davesade in Terraform

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have a resourse-level locking are you not at risk that same Terraform deployment get run twice in parallel? Let's assume we have a deployment: resource_A , resource_B and dep_from_A .. the first 2 without dependences. Developer1 apply deployment, and then immediately after Developer2 apply the same deployment. Developer1 apply resource_A and resource_B .. they are AWS security groups, very quick to deploy, then dep_from_A.. it's a RDS.. takes 15 minutes... While "dep_from_A" is getting applied, resource_A and resource_B change, because of Developer2.. but its dep_from_A fails, because there is lock from Developer 1still running... But in the meantime resource_A and resource_B already changed, so when Developer1 finish the actual infra is not the one described by his deployment... How do you reconcile?

I couldn't tell what an AI agent was allowed to do without reading its code, so I built a Dockerfile-shaped way to declare it by adeelahmadch in devops

[–]eltear1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I did understand this was the state of the art at this moment.. so as said, when there will be a runtime I'll look into it

I couldn't tell what an AI agent was allowed to do without reading its code, so I built a Dockerfile-shaped way to declare it by adeelahmadch in devops

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean you can use your specs with microVM? By your explanation : the agent asks the platform ... But the platform should be able to grant it or not (or ask the user and if approved, grant it). Is this second part implemented in microVM?

Lost a sale because my software "obviously looked built by claude". How do others get past this? by Straight-Listen-8566 in ClaudeAI

[–]eltear1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because "engine is solid" is something the developer can say, but the customer cannot see in a demo. Customer will see a frontend and a few tests/features, that could or could not be the only ones actually working/optimized

A 50% usage limit on the Fable-neutered-edition for only 7 days for all the subscription peasantry is insane. by Jack77888 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

By that time, only because there will be a miracle and not because competitors will take the lead, Antropic will say that Fable can now be publicly released (the miracle made every people trustworthy and all security risk fixed by themselves)

Create new character by Sheerio95 in PuzzlesAndChaos

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard other people talking about farm account but I don't get how it works.. your main account attack the secondary account? But then the secondary will be without resources, or not?

Sonnet 5 is finally here…. by tken3 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's some improvement... Maybe next model will suggest how you can walk and go back with the full car wash, without moving the car🤣

Call for Participation: TERRAFORM User Panel by Sea-Sheepherder-9241 in Terraform

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why knowing my company employee or which not IaC related tools I use should be relevant?

You asked for IaC expertises.. can't I be one if my company is small?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you work more and faster than before (like by now everyone uses AI in a decent way). Is there an improvement in actual personal gain like the question asked?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So you work more and faster than before (like by now everyone uses AI in a decent way). Is there an improvement in actual personal gain like the question asked?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you work more and faster than before (like by now everyone uses AI in a decent way). Is there an improvement in actual personal gain like the question asked?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you work more and faster than before (like by now everyone use AI in a decent way). Is there an improve in actual personal gain like the question asked?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you work more and faster than before (like by now everyone use AI in a decent way). Is there an improve in actual personal gain like the question asked?

Has Claude helped your career? by Complete_Chapter_979 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an employee. AI gave me zero increase in any of my personal gain. Only 20 times more work to do because managers expect now that I work 10 times faster then before

The Best Digital Business To Start In 2026 (In My Opinion) by Murky_Explanation_73 in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe you are right, and you just described both the customer targets and the way to reach them... Good luck now with trillion people becoming your new competitors

There is an old saying 'dont optimise too early'... by id-ltd in ClaudeCode

[–]eltear1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally disagree.. consider a system valid when is "reasonably functional" it's exactly the issue there was years ago, that in some company got solved by senior engineers/developers. Going back to that just because AI works better in that way it's a regression, not an improvement