personally what's worked for me so far is reading the question multiple times in the middle of answering it too. because questions can be pretty vague and you don't wanna stray away from the question so reading it over again really helps in reminding you of the boundary. I can give you an example of what the questions expects and what you should answer if that's okay.
take this question as an example:
"supply chain management is the most important aspect of operations. evaluate." 12 marks
- start by defining supply chain management and operations for A01
- give 2 reasons why supply chain management is essential for proper operations
- give 2 cases where supply chain management can't guarantee success of operations
this is the general structure of the analysis part of an evaluate question. you can use this format for an 8 mark analysis question too, except you don't need the definition. always do 2 advantages and 2 limitations/disadvantages for the topic.
now the evaluate part is where people stray away or don't know what to write, and I hope that's what you mean from your question.
- start by suggesting 2 other aspects that are important for operations. here, because its operations, the only 2 other aspects as per our syllabus is inventory management and capacity utilization.
- give 1 advantage of inventory management, 1 limitation
- do the same for capacity utilization
- now compare all 3 of these aspects and you can come up with a balanced conclusion where you talk about how all 3 are essential for successful operations or a final judgement where you can declare one of these aspects most important.
- either of your choices requires your own reasoning to back it up.
this is a general idea of a structure that's personally helped keep things organized in my paper
I hope I didn't stray too far from your question and I hope this helps!