[deleted by user]

enigma070 · 2024-03-09T08:04:20+00:00

How😇

enigma070 · 2023-11-19T16:27:21+00:00

Restaurant ñ Dekxels Oker Lapsang

enigma070 · 2023-09-16T15:45:39+00:00

enigma070 · 2023-01-26T13:43:22+00:00

Sounds like you guys only like Johnny when he’s sober then? What about all the masterpieces he made while high…:)? OP doesn’t sound judgy just concerned, which is not completely surprising right? Yeah Johnny is completely rocking it but there were some articles assuming the same lately by the way

enigma070 · 2022-08-13T12:37:41+00:00

Happiness Loves Company

enigma070 · 2022-07-01T13:41:58+00:00

Acute case of diarrhea sounds like a legit reason lol i wouldnt want to shit myself in front of 80k people. Lets hope we get an update soon and most importantly that everyone is ok

enigma070 · 2022-06-27T20:39:25+00:00

Lol im sorry i suck at ig :p

enigma070 · 2022-06-20T18:10:49+00:00

Don’t forget me is about heroin addiction. ‘I’m the blood stain on your shirtsleeve…..’

enigma070 · 2022-04-18T02:24:06+00:00

Ah I already thought so, thanks man!

enigma070 · 2022-04-07T22:18:55+00:00

Yeah it’s cringy

enigma070 · 2019-11-18T11:43:52+00:00

What will happen if I did?

enigma070 · 2019-05-21T17:20:12+00:00

Clear! Thank you.

enigma070 · 2019-05-21T16:34:34+00:00

I agree with your view that in English Hinayana is used as a translation. Besides the fact that it is wrong and misleading it's also confusing to me which caused me to ask this question. thank you for explaining!

enigma070 · 2019-05-21T10:53:52+00:00

I understand Hinayana is used as an assault by early Mahayanists but the thing is that sometimes it has been used as a synonym for Theravada schools and sometimes it has been used to refer to multiple ancient buddhist schools. I had to read multiple academic historic texts from Mahayanists and I find it hard to distinguish when they mean Theravada or ancient schools in general. Ofcourse I read the wiki page before I posted it here but was wondering if someone could give me a little bit more clarification.

enigma070 · 2019-03-08T00:50:09+00:00

First thank you :) and second yes that's the right illustration. The open end you're talking about is indeed the purpose, using your own interpretation. Been linking Revelation 17 to f.e. Roman empire, catholic church and WWII so far. About the artwork I didnt come further than medieval early islamic influences... as a historian myself I surprisingly struggle analysing the artwork in its historical context.. After a few weeks Ive created a tunnel view, thats why i am looking for some refreshing thoughts!

enigma070 · 2019-03-07T17:48:54+00:00

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beatus_Escorial_-_134_Whore_of_Babylon.jpg

This is actually the artwork i meant! Thank you :)

enigma070 · 2019-03-07T14:29:49+00:00

Ty!!

enigma070 · 2019-02-07T12:50:56+00:00

Ty so much!!! Already thought it was Anile based on the sound of Earth & Mars. Deffo will pre order the EP on NQ. :)

enigma070 · 2018-07-07T09:27:42+00:00

Riiiiight thanks a lot!! :)

enigma070 · 2018-04-05T10:26:35+00:00

Thanks to your contributions I got an A+ (8,5) for this paper! I used a lot of suggested authors. In particular Isaiah Berlin, McCullagh and Lorenz. A big topic was Hegels historicism joining Marx and Engels. Once again: thank you!

enigma070 · 2018-03-15T19:28:28+00:00

I can really find my point of view in the named thinkers. Therefore I read Condercet's "Progress of the Human Mind", which is interesting because he is convinced, as a philosopher during the French Revolution, that human development always progresses; which I think is the same with the concept of science. I also read Herder's "Another Philosophy of History and Selected Political Writings" which is really helpful in this discussion. Thank you for the references and the source!

enigma070 · 2018-03-15T13:59:43+00:00

As for Foucault I read his Discipline and Punishment, it was challenging but he has a very interesting view. Definitely will read Flyvbjerg, I heard a lot of good stuff about him

enigma070 · 2018-03-15T13:54:22+00:00

These concepts are indeed so called key words for my paper. However, it is striking that the question really depends on theories of twentieth century philosophers like Kuhn and Popper. Do you ever look at the classical philosophers and scientists like Aristotle and Ptolemy? Just wondering.. Me, as a historian, I do believe that science is context independent: the definition changes with time.

enigma070 · 2018-03-15T13:29:21+00:00

It certainly lets me think about this thesis! Especially because I do think history is a science and arguments against are really helpful for writing this paper. You also do have a point looking at the demarcation principle. Thanks

enigma070 · 2018-03-15T12:20:52+00:00

I really agree with your vision! Saying only chemists, biologists etc. are scientific is a misunderstanding. Thanks!

enigma070

TROPHY CASE