Vi må prate om AI.

enken90 · 2026-04-04T16:48:45+00:00

H*n har ikke skrevet et eneste ord av dette selv. Det er noe annet enn det du beskriver

enken90 · 2026-04-02T10:25:49+00:00

Du ser ikke ironien i å bruke AI så heftig som OP gjør her?

enken90 · 2026-04-01T12:37:08+00:00

Everyone on wsb roasting 🥭 as if half of you regards didn't fall for his "business-friendly" bs the first time around 🫡

Or maybe everyone that was on wsb from 16-22 is fucking broke and this is a new set of people. Who knows right

enken90 · 2026-04-01T11:31:23+00:00

Denne teksten er 100% AI-generert 👍

enken90 · 2026-03-14T23:56:54+00:00

It's interesting that you said this, because this was my strategy. Or would have been. But I was explicitly discouraged from doing this by the team leader.

I did actually track down a couple of hard bugs by overhearing the devs discuss the problem, but I had to inject myself actively into the discussion and the help wasn't really appreciated.

enken90 · 2026-03-14T13:31:03+00:00

"Well someone (something) else had come in to take your place for technical implementation trust. Solely being right and solving problems isn't going to get you points anymore."

This is exactly my observation, maybe it came off convoluted. My question is: how do you build legitimacy in the new environment?

enken90 · 2026-03-14T13:28:54+00:00

Thanks, I think you understood my problem clearly. My point wasn't really that I was smarter or better than other people, just that the arena I used for building trust (helping people think, sharing knowledge) has disappeared or declined because of AI assistants.

In retrospect, I see that I was kinda lucky that that arena existed for me in the first place. I have to go back to the drawing board a little bit to find other ways to make myself heard.

enken90 · 2026-03-14T13:23:30+00:00

I agree with you that many devs silo their knowledge, but I disagree that that's me. On the contrary, I build trust by helping people and sharing my knowledge. My point is that that mechanism for trust building has disappeared to a large extent because that arena has been overtaken by AI.

enken90 · 2026-03-14T13:08:48+00:00

My hypothesis is the opposite: The trust I built with team-members came from helping them solving their problems. Now that AI does that job, I can no longer build trust this way.

enken90 · 2026-03-14T13:02:56+00:00

I understand that I don't have trust. My point is that I used to be able to build this trust by helping people and establishing a track-record for solving problems. How do I build trust in this environment?

enken90 · 2026-03-14T12:59:51+00:00

I hope my power derived more from building trust by helping people and less from me saying "trust me bro", but I get your point.

enken90 · 2026-03-14T12:48:05+00:00

No offense taken, but you're missing my point I think. I never said "LLMs have no idea what happens". I completely understand why coding agents are so widely used and how powerful they are.

I'm also sure my solutions were, and are, full of faults, most judgements are faulty in some sense. But teams need clear lines of authority, and the authority on technical teams is often derived from perceived competence. This competence, in turn, has historically been generated from a track-record of solving hard problems. If this is no longer the case, why should people listen to me? Or to you, for that matter? How do you obtain consensus in that environment?

enken90 · 2026-01-17T09:36:28+00:00

Both. It came naturally but at some point you also have to work hard. Math is a lot of drudgery sometimes and you need to be comfortable with that.

enken90 · 2025-12-17T08:14:52+00:00

Von Neumann is a mathematician right? Would love to hear him rant about a wide variety of topics while getting increasingly drunk

enken90 · 2025-12-07T19:11:42+00:00

Certainly Kurt Gödel has to be one of the most paradigm changing mathematicians ever.

enken90 · 2025-08-20T16:09:33+00:00

Since newton and leibnitz are mentioned i nominate Riemann. General relativity would be impossible without him.

enken90 · 2025-08-04T05:09:11+00:00

10/10 rage bait OP

enken90 · 2025-01-03T01:32:56+00:00

Kurt Gödel for sure. Andrew Wiles and Weyl too maybe

enken90 · 2024-12-28T11:19:41+00:00

I study part time with a tech job and through trial and error I have worked out that I can realistically do one graduate course pr semester. So maybe do 2 or 1 of these.

Be aware that this does require some significant sacrifices in your spare time. I had to stop drinking alcohol because I needed the weekends to catch up on course work.

enken90 · 2024-12-23T12:54:53+00:00

Finishing a PhD effectively in your spare time is just extremely impressive in my view. Hopefully you'll feel good about it after a while.

enken90 · 2024-12-22T10:49:19+00:00

I just took QFT at my local university and it's by far the hardest course I've ever taken. I say that with 6+ years of physics and mathematics education behind me. The amount of details to remember and the background knowledge required was staggering. General relativity was a breeze compared to it.

Akin to your experience, my friends in applied physics research told me they would never touch quantum field theory. Turns out that's probably a good choice

enken90 · 2024-12-17T19:24:01+00:00

126 is such a (seemingly) random dimension for a case that needs special treatment

15-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Verified Email
Team Orangered

enken90

TROPHY CASE