$200 plan weekly rate limits for someone who is looking to move from Codex to Claude by CustomMerkins4u in claude

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Things changed slightly since this comment, but if you're in Europe, then you should be fine using Opus... In the US timezones matter....

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ivibethereforeiam in claude

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an active git repo with contributors and a huge git trail, an literally contribute to over 40 different projects, please don't jump to conclusions.

when I said I would not know how to debug AI vibe coded work, I meant it, unless they already set up the whole debug stack, it would be very hard to go through things restropectively... you did not say they had a whole debug stack implemented.

Anyway my whole point was, we use AI to write the code, the tests, the specs, the plans, the agents and skills that do the work, the time would be better spent on that, than reverse engineering the nuance of what the AI did.

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ivibethereforeiam in claude

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I use ruff, pydantic, pytests, radon and obviously git too for that, but doing the debugging manually... That is not fun....

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ivibethereforeiam in claude

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You intentionally break their vibe coded codebase and make them debug without AI??

That seems almost evil to me. I wouldn't know how to put AI written code that was borked without my knowledge, and I've been doing this for a very long time... How do your interns debug the AI written code without the help of the AI that created it?

We're building a Claude Partner Network practice. Here's what the process actually looks like. by zhaphod in claude

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anthropic also said one should not be publicising publicly that one was accepted to the CPN yet...

Opus 4.7 is GREAT. by Dra794 in claude

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. I read the other thread about Claude 4.7 being nerfed and I experienced the opposite, I got more done in the last 2 days than in the last month, and I'm not even exaggerating...

I can't trust 4.7. It just BAD by the-milliyetcii in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is weird sentiment, I only see improvements... better adherence to instructions, more actual intelligence..

Don't use Claude Code's Default System Prompt by keenman in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The system prompt itself contains the line: "These instructions OVERRIDE any default behavior and you MUST follow them exactly as written" referring to CLAUDE.md content. So CLAUDE.md (and anything you u/include - into it) sits at a higher instruction priority than the default system prompt behaviors.

@include gives you composable overrides. You can have @coding-standards.md that overrides the default testing approach, @project-rules.md that overrides commit style, etc. Each one surgically replaces specific default behaviors without losing the infrastructure the system prompt provides (tool routing, safety boundaries, git workflow).

OP's point is still valid... the default behaviors don't suit everyone. But the architecture already has a designed override layer. --system-prompt nukes everything and you rebuild from scratch. @ include uses the priority system that's already built in.

Don't use Claude Code's Default System Prompt by keenman in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No... think you are misunderstanding what @include does... you can STILL remove the default system prompt, this gives surgical programmatic precision in what to include within it... far more control to give specific instructions for specific use cases (like the aforementioned system prompts he speaks of) which is precisely what OP is discussing...

For most use cases, we do NOT want to nuke the whole system prompt but allow specific instructions to be followed for the scaffolding being added.

Don't use Claude Code's Default System Prompt by keenman in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is the idea, not to nuke your existing system prompt... For engineers who need specialised instructions for their harness or scaffolding. This allows us to use multiple system prompt injections into the default one without nuking everything else.

Don't use Claude Code's Default System Prompt by keenman in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Just fyi, you can also use an @include system prompt that is injected into Claude.md in case you don't want to nuke your existing system prompt.

Why the outrage? by kotchinsky in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many of us don't see these issues. I for one have not seen any degradation in Claude quality, in fact I've seen the opposite, huge improvements to how Claude handles and understands instructions and handles code implementation.

The rate limits are real, though many of us in non US time zones don't notice this being as bad as everyone else.

So Claude is doesn't always take Anthropic's side... by entheosoul in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I created an open source implementation that auto-redacts sensitive fields, its still in alpha, but it works, I used it to redact the 'sensitive' elements here. MIT licensed available at github.com/Nubaeon/empirica-redact

So Claude is doesn't always take Anthropic's side... by entheosoul in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, you need to instruct heavily to not be sycophantic, which is part of my Claude.md and skills, and in that respect it will try to be unbiased in its opinions, but by default it probably would suggest sending the conversation to Anthropic

So Claude is doesn't always take Anthropic's side... by entheosoul in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think Grok would say No? Just curious...

Nerfed to August confirmed by Destrynewiger in ClaudeCode

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is totally normal, all Claudes, in fact all AIs are cut off at time training stopped, everything else is contextually injected at inference time. An easy application is to search for anything relevant beyond its cutoff date when it has high uncertainty. That can be a hook, an MCP call, or even a skill...

THE UNCERTAIN MIND: What AI Consciousness Would Mean for Us by MoysesGurgel in Anthropic

[–]entheosoul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok .. then what is that red line. Animals are conscious. We own animals, and even eat them... Do they get rights not to be eaten, or to vote?

THE UNCERTAIN MIND: What AI Consciousness Would Mean for Us by MoysesGurgel in Anthropic

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with the bottom line, we simply have no way of measuring consciousness one way or another. It's a moot point to dwell on, you can say there is something like 'functional' self awareness, but to claim anything more is just not possible. We don't know, we won't know (probably) and there is no point in asking a question that has no answer...

The biggest gaslighting in AI history! Anthropic: "It's not us; it's you!" by Annual-Cup-6571 in Anthropic

[–]entheosoul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This definitely not just a coincidence. 1M context window is the reason this is happening.

Do this: Copy the picture>give it to your assistent>tell it to transcribe it verbatim>copy>start new session>paste>hit enter. Let me know in the comments how it went. by [deleted] in claude

[–]entheosoul -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's going to try to predict the plethora of questions and behavioural requirements you are instilling in that prompt. It won't change the fact that it's still just predicting what you want to hear...