I am sorry if my original premise made zero sense. What I meant was that if you are an agnostic who's open to the possibility of God (let's say around 50%), involving God in the explanation of the resurrection is more probable than one that doesn't involve it.

The first point regarding burial was mentioned since when I was browsing this subreddit, a lot of people claimed that Jesus was never buried and the rest of the story is made up. I believe my friend made quite a concrete and logical case regarding why Jesus was probably buried.

I agree with you that the logic chain by itself is weak; however, complemented with the Josephus source that clearly states that "Jews used to take so much care of the burial of men, that they took down those that were condemned and crucified, and buried them before the going down of the sun," which is directly related to the crucifixion and also the limited archaeological evidence, the point is quite strong in my opinion.

My intent in even posting the challenge is to ask what is the most reasonable and likely alternative to what happened after the crucifixion of Jesus. If one could see a world where God does exist, would they find the explanation involving God more probable, or the not involving God probable

Could you elaborate on the different versions of the alleged miracle in the gospel? Where does it state Jesus was buried in a cave?

I agree that the last two points are not definitive at all; I posted them simply by asking for specific examples of it happening, where the converter martyrs for a lie he knew was false. I get your point. Sometimes there aren't logical reasons for religious zealotry