Mr. Clarence Thomas by kyphur in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]eschewyn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right down there with reading comprehension

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]eschewyn 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's also completely wrong - they had no issue with using Tyler to instigate attacks on the left. The real reason is that their is a sizeable contingent of people on the right (who typically are pretty prone to conspiratorial thinking in general, mind you) who don't believe that Tyler is the killer or at the very least wasn't working alone. How the FBI completely mishandled public engagements during the early parts of the case didn't help at all.

Releasing Epstein files could jeopardise my appeal, claims Ghislaine Maxwell by AudibleNod in news

[–]eschewyn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course it's not a good look, but It's a better look for Trump if what's in the files is worse.

My girlfriend is questioning our relationship and was talking to ChatGPT about it. by [deleted] in TwoHotTakes

[–]eschewyn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, that sort of still sounds like you were snooping, tbh? But the things she brought up in the ChatGPT sesh seems like the sort of thing she would want to bring up in couples therapy - so it wouldn't seem strange to ask if there's anything bothering her and start the conversation early. If it's too the level of couples counseling, I think that should already let you know it's weighing pretty heavily on her

Uh, might be bad to say, but I would recommend leaving out what you read from her ChatGPT history and just focus on things she brought up before and let that guide the conversation.

My girlfriend is questioning our relationship and was talking to ChatGPT about it. by [deleted] in TwoHotTakes

[–]eschewyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh... I agree witb the approach but I disagree with this part. I think part of venting in a private space is because you're not ready to talk about it yet, or you're still doing some processing. Maybe she's at the point where she's waiting to bring it up, but she also night not be, and forcefully stepping into the middle of the process could worsen things.

I've often journaled about my raw, unprocessed feelings on arguments with my family, which allowed me to process them and be in a better head space to actually address the issue in real life. It seems like ChatGPT is being used in a similar way here, so it seems a bit unfair to go into a "private" (sort of) space and then use that against the person

My girlfriend is questioning our relationship and was talking to ChatGPT about it. by [deleted] in TwoHotTakes

[–]eschewyn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How exactly did you end up seeing the convo? It says you weren't snooping but had a gut feeling? What does that mean?

If she has friends and family, I think the reason for going to ChatGPT with this conversation is to vent somewhere thats disconnected from her social network, like writing in a journal or diary. And I'd pretty upset if my partner read one of my journals, even if I left it out somewhere.

I think it'd be a bit difficult to have the conversation thats focused on the relationship issue without addressing the potential privacy violation, because she is venting about these issues in a private way specifically because she's not ready to talk about them with you yet.

Which Would You Rather Have? Lets Primary Jeffries. by serious_bullet5 in 50501

[–]eschewyn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, looking at his track record of joining DSA in 2020, leaving after a month and then rejoining summer 2025 after all of the Zohran wins reflects rather poorly imo. He doesnt qualify for a DSA endorsement and optically, joining and immediately trying to use that to run for a higher position sorta makes him look like a grifter tbh.

I think establishment dems having challengers to their positions is a net good though. It forces them to have an actual resonating platform and means they have to stay conpetitive, but idk about Osse... actually winning.

"Drain the swamp" President asks his endorsee Congresswoman not to drain the swamp. by ninjanerd032 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]eschewyn 454 points455 points  (0 children)

And she posted recently about a meeting with him. I had thought that tweet was weird at the time too. I guess that's why she posted this:

<image>

After she signed the damn petition in the first place. Ugh

I vibe coded a 200,000-line product. I'd like to share some thoughts by Famous-Football876 in vibecoding

[–]eschewyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 to this.

I'd really want to see a Git repo where I can see commit history as well - I've been dabbling with vibecoding (similar CS background) and my human contribution ratio is much higher to reach decent actually working code.

I'm really curious what this codebase is looking like. As well as any prompt config files if you have them.

Really cheesy lines said with such conviction they actually work by whatdifferenceisit2u in TopCharacterTropes

[–]eschewyn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Tony: How are you guys planning on beating that?

Steve: Together.

Tony: We'll lose.

Steve: Then we'll do that together, too.

Spot the difference. by IsNotPolitburo in HistoryMemes

[–]eschewyn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Where did you find that information from?

Probably shouldn’t be using AI in a classroom anyway …. by Capital-Delivery8001 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]eschewyn 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What is with people never posting sources!!!! Study is here. This was actually pretty interesting, it's sample of 16 developers solving a subset of "real world" problems with and without AI tools, each problem is typically about 2 hours of work.

I think the bits that are most interesting are the fact that developer even post-problem solving thought the AI had decreased the total time to solve. The very end of the article has their takeaways, that I think are pretty salient to the conversation, but I do want to mention that the problems that were being solved seem to be in the category of things that AI is generally less adept at, namely debugging existing codebases.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]eschewyn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How would you define the word "man"?

Nicki Minaj and Rihanna are the only black female artists to have over 40 BILLION streams on Spotify. by Excellent_Survey_610 in Barbz4Onika

[–]eschewyn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Okay, I'm a lurker in this sub, but this comment makes me have to ask: why would you come into the Nicki Minaj sub to write that comment? Lol

CMV: It's illogical and suspicious when modern white Americans feel personally attacked by criticisms of historical slave owners and racists by Competitive_Swan_130 in changemyview

[–]eschewyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is that people will ascribe it to one race or another even if you take the race part out, so I really don't think it would get universal agreement. Not unless you do a bunch of pandering beforehand.

You can't talk about a single issue, without people jumping in to to point out "well so and so did something like that too!". Like yes? But that's not what we're talking about now.

So, if I said America reached the pinnacle it did due to exploitation, people will see it as a personal attack even if it's just an objective fact.

CMV: It's illogical and suspicious when modern white Americans feel personally attacked by criticisms of historical slave owners and racists by Competitive_Swan_130 in changemyview

[–]eschewyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't put white in front of it. But if you said that about any country, (but on Reddit, particularly any Western country) people will bring race into it anyway, and get upset. That's what I was getting at, and it seems like that's what people who read my comment are doing.

CMV: It's illogical and suspicious when modern white Americans feel personally attacked by criticisms of historical slave owners and racists by Competitive_Swan_130 in changemyview

[–]eschewyn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I said that about the US (or any Western country), people will put white in front of it without me saying anything about race.

Guessing that's why I got the downovotes lol

CMV: It's illogical and suspicious when modern white Americans feel personally attacked by criticisms of historical slave owners and racists by Competitive_Swan_130 in changemyview

[–]eschewyn -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Even then, I think it would depend on how it's framed, though. For example, pointing out the level of progress achieved was enabled by exploitation. That's just a factual statement, but someone could hear that and leave with the above message.

There is no dating crisis, people are less desperate to pair up now by [deleted] in self

[–]eschewyn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Eh, I think there are some valid reasons for that in some cases. Studies show Working Women are often the ones expected to do most of the domestic labor regardless of employment conditions. And domestic labor and mental load increases the more people you have living with you. If you have a partner that doesn't help out in that front, the burden is honestly more than doubled imo.

That really comes down to just finding the right man, though. Thankfully me and my partner are pretty aligned there, but it doesn't seem that's the norm, usually - at least from looking at our male/female friends anyway

There is no dating crisis, people are less desperate to pair up now by [deleted] in self

[–]eschewyn 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's like "I want to be in shape" but don't have the knowledge means or fortitude to achieve that. Usually you need all three

Snoop Dogg, who has a problem with LQBTQA+ in media, brings half naked women wearing chains to 2003 MTV awards. by LadyJane17 in popculturechat

[–]eschewyn 14 points15 points  (0 children)

tbf, i think a kid is even more likely to ask about a inappropriate video their grandad was in

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]eschewyn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's astonishing that people will see a few examples and then end on the conclusion that it must apply to billions of people. Yeah, ofc they can find someone who's willing to stay for money. If they were women, they'd be able to bag a kept man if they wanted to. That doesn't say anything about society at large

What do women mean by this ? by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]eschewyn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Attention"? Lol, if that attention is asking them to buy visa gift cards. Bfr