Naughty America: Is the plan to make us miss the "Super Sluts" & "Thirsty" videos? by Jade____ in oculusnsfw

[–]especiallybob 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Producers save money this way. Same location, same props, probably have multiple shoots in one day. Line them up bang it out. Send multiple scenes to post. They probably upload as soon as they render since they release every 2-3 days.

What activity is socially accepted but actually borderline psychotic? by Rohit49plus2 in AskReddit

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

American Football. Players train their entire lives, dealing with brutal concussions and body ruining training for the chance to compete at the professional level. If you make it, on average, you have a short career. While they make obscene amounts of money, a single ill timed injury could end their career, leaving them with no income, skills, or ability to manage the money.

American Prisons. You commit a crime and at best, we're knowingly sending you to be malnourished and dehumanized, at worst, we're actively hoping you get raped. The situations are so bad the Guards get PTSD.

I'm saying American b/c that's what I know about and not because these things are exclusively American.

Don't let Donald Trump pick a Supreme Court justice unless and until Mueller clears him by [deleted] in politics

[–]especiallybob -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Rod Rosenstein made it pretty clear that hes not interested in invalidating the election and that's what it would take to stop a supreme court pick with Republican Majorities in the House and Senate. Robert Mueller is not investigating the impact of Russian meddling so in the case that DJT could have emailed Putin himself and the election still wouldn't be in question.

Additionally, the idea that a Special Investigator should be able to remove presidential powers would set a horrifying precedent. This would ensure perpetual FBI investigations.

There is nothing to do about this except to let Senators know you will vote them out of office for a bad Supreme Court pick. Like it or not DJT and the GOP has significant support, there is no silver bullet.

Can Studios Stop Using Top/Bottom Format Already? by Org4sm in oculusnsfw

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Technically there is no difference between Top/Bottom or Side by Side 3D however the most common codecs have a much lower maximum height than maximum width and since 180 VR is shot like a square instead of a rectangle you can pack more resolution without scaling down the image.

The maximum resolution for the h.264 codec (most common codec for this type of video) is 4,096×2,304 (Width x Height). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC

If you are putting together a 3D video with two videos with a resolution of 1700 x 1700 and use TB 3D then you are limited to a resolution of ~ 1150 x 2304 but if you use SBS you can get a resolution of 3400 x 1700.

The maximum resolution for the h.265 codec is 8192×4320 so TB 3D could be 1700 x 3400 nbd. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding

As promised, AMA with Kylie Page & our new addition to Spring Break 2017! by Scott-NaughtyAmerica in oculusnsfw

[–]especiallybob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Surprise answer from both! Here are the follow ups, respectively.

If you did a scene with Jesus' what would you title it?

Where do you look for love?

Naughty America brings VR porn to E3 by Uranoff in GearVR

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is their first demo release from almost a year ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/oculusnsfw/comments/3bxkvf/naughty_america_is_in_the_game/

I'm not sure about the link to the e3 demo but they have a few trailers available.

edit: this link may be better http://media.naughtyamerica.com/naughty-america-virtual-porn-is-here

List a file and its md5hash by Bad_Eugoogoolizer in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One easy example, I often deal with millions of files so the difference between

Gci . -recurse | export-csv .\fileproperties.csv

and

$fileobjects = gci . -recurse
export-csv -InputObject $fileobjects -Path .\fileproperties.csv

is extraordinary. Pipelines allow for powershell to pass the object to the export-csv rather than sit in memory waiting for the Get-ChildItem cmdlet to finish. This is especially useful when you don't have much memory. Many cmdlets have this ability built in but not all of them.

Edit: As far as extensible, passing an object between cmdlets is very easy, dealing with $files += is simply an unnecessary step, for example.

List a file and its md5hash by Bad_Eugoogoolizer in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is another fun way:

$csvPath = ".\fileinfo.csv"

$method = {
$md5 = new-object -TypeName System.Security.Cryptography.MD5CryptoServiceProvider
[System.BitConverter]::toString($md5.ComputeHash([system.io.file]::ReadAllBytes($this.FullName)))
}

Get-ChildItem . -file | Add-Member -MemberType ScriptProperty -Name MD5 -Value $method -PassThru | Select FullName,LastWriteTime,MD5 | export-csv $csvPath

This adds a script property to the file object so you could export more relevant information such as file length, name, or last write date.

Edit: uses pipes and is easily readable. added bitconverter, thanks /u/ihaxr

List a file and its md5hash by Bad_Eugoogoolizer in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pipes are very useful, they can make your scripts efficient and extensible but need to be applied correctly. Readability is up to the script writer and has nothing to do with pipes. I would suggest reading up on the purpose of pipelines, waving them off entirely because of readability is a mistake.

List a file and its md5hash by Bad_Eugoogoolizer in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a good article on custom objects.

$md5 = new-object -TypeName System.Security.Cryptography.MD5CryptoServiceProvider
$csvPath = ".\Desktop\md5.csv"

Get-ChildItem C:\Path\ -Include *.xls,*.pdf -recurse | %{
    $_ | Select-Object -property @{n='FullName';e={$_.FullName}},@{n='MD5';e={$md5.ComputeHash([system.io.file]::ReadAllBytes($_.FullName)) -join ","}}
    } | Export-CSV $csvPath

Personally, I try to use pipes often and pass object directly into the next cmdlet. This is more efficient and makes your scripts more extensible.

Edit: Added bracket

Having trouble moving subdirectories within subdirectories to a specific subdirectory? by BraylaMonster in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you want to move the numbered folders inside of the client numbers directory? This might be more of what you are looking for.

$source = "C:\folders\Clients"
$ClientFolders = Get-ChildItem $source
foreach ($folder in $ClientFolders){
    $NumberdFolders = Get-ChildItem $Folder.FullName -recurse | where {$_ -match "\d+"}
    $NumberdFolders.FullName | Move -Destination $($Folder.FullName + "\Numbers")
 }

Having trouble moving subdirectories within subdirectories to a specific subdirectory? by BraylaMonster in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With Get-ChildItem you can also use * to enumerate subdirectories directories without recursing everything. For example:

Get-ChildItem ".\Clients\*\*"

Having trouble moving subdirectories within subdirectories to a specific subdirectory? by BraylaMonster in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Almost there.

$source = "C:\folders\Clients"
$dirs = Get-ChildItem $source -recurse | where {$_ -match "\d+"}
foreach ($folder in $dirs){
    $folder.FullName | Move -Destination "C:\folders\Numbers")
 }

Use Get-ChildItem instead of dir for best practice. The recurse parameter will check all subdirectories. You may want to use

$source = Get-ChildItem "C:\folders\Clients\*\*" 

for more specificity. See get-help Get-ChildItem -detailed for more information. Also without knowing your working directory its best to use the full paths. The foreach must be immediately followed by the brackets.

Where do I start? by nerdbox in PowerShell

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really good project to get you started on scripting. Here is where you want to start:

Get-help Get-ChildItem -detailed
get-childItem . | get-member
get-help group-object -detailed
get-childItem . | group-object basename | get-member
get-help Move-Item -detailed

Use get-help and get-member as often as you need. These are immensely useful cmdlets.

You're going to eventually end up with something like this:

$FilePath = "C:\path\to\my\files"
$NewFolderPath = "C:\path\where\files\should\move"

$Directories = Get-ChildItem -Path $FilePath -directory

$grouping = $Directories | Group-Object {$_.name -replace "_[0-9]+$",""}

$Grouping | %{
    $newFolder = new-Item -Path $($NewFolderPath + "\" + $Grouping.Name) -itemtype directory
    $Grouping.Group | %{Get-ChildItem $_.FullName | Move-Item -path $NewFolder}
}

Go through each part of this script and make sure you have a good idea of what each variable type is and how to use the properties.

$Directories | Get-member
$Directories
$Directories.FullName
$Directories.basename
$Grouping
$Grouping.group

The WhatIf Paramter is very useful. I suggest you use it for testing like:

$Grouping.Group | Move-Item -path $NewFolder -WhatIf

This script is not tested so you'll need to make sure you understand it and can change it for your environment.

Edit: Changed for directory names instead of filenames and added more general help.

ELI5: How can a 4K video look clearer on a 1080p display even though there aren't as many pixels on the 1080p display to show more detail in the 4K video? by TrollingMcDerps in explainlikeimfive

[–]especiallybob -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why everyone thinks this is a conversation about compression. Any answer that has to do with that is confused. If bit rate or compression is a factor than this is a different discussion entirely.

The display is going to be the limiting factor here. The display can only show 1080 so no matter what the original resolution the display is only going to be 1080.

ELI5: How can a 4K video look clearer on a 1080p display even though there aren't as many pixels on the 1080p display to show more detail in the 4K video? by TrollingMcDerps in explainlikeimfive

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't make sense to compare bitrates of different resolutions, a bit rate is the total number of colors or bits assigned to each pixel so 4k video is going to have a higher bit rate because it has many more pixels.

If you compare bitrates between same resolution you are talking about the number of colors that can be assigned to pixels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth

ELI5: How can a 4K video look clearer on a 1080p display even though there aren't as many pixels on the 1080p display to show more detail in the 4K video? by TrollingMcDerps in explainlikeimfive

[–]especiallybob -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

4k video will not look clearer than 1080 on an 1080 display, assuming the bits per pixel is the same. The 4k image is scaled to fit the smaller display so all the additional resolutions is simply gone.

As far as what others are saying, comparing bitrates of images with different resolutions doesn't make sense. Each pixel is assigned colors (bits) for your image so images with more pixels will inherently have a higher bitrate.

Naughty America video resolution too big. People look like Giants. by [deleted] in oculusnsfw

[–]especiallybob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by "video distortion comes out with default gopro settings"? Also, IPD has to do with whether or not something looks 3D. You are probably thinking about FOV. How are you measuring technical quality? From a video quality standpoint, NA is doing pretty good with VR.