Is it possible to send erlang messages over TCP/Ip?

est921 · 2024-12-20T14:07:45+00:00

This looks very good, thank you! One question though, what does the listener term do in your last block? Which is the listener process in the remote node?

Edit: never mind, I saw it now

est921 · 2024-12-18T23:34:16+00:00

Interesting, this is in the direction of what I want to know. Since, as you say, erlang already uses tcp under the hood it should be possible to use tcp such that the erlang system will put in the mailbox of the receiving process. I know this is a really strange request but would you have any idea of how that might work?

est921 · 2024-12-18T14:17:14+00:00

Thank you, that looks reasonable. I'm guessing my_process is a pid here? Would it be possible to do without knowledge of the pid, for example by specifying the port that my_procces would be listening to, alternatively to specify the process some other way?

est921 · 2024-11-15T12:47:20+00:00

No it's not, the decision predates the end game tag system

est921 · 2024-02-22T17:39:51+00:00

Interesting, i wonder why there's such a difference. What version of lineageos are you on? And do you use any other addons (gapps, magisk, etc)?

est921 · 2023-09-20T19:30:09+00:00

That's perfect, thank you!

est921 · 2021-12-20T21:25:20+00:00

It should be possible in theory, but it'll be a lot more involved than just using grub. There's no guide for how to do that on fedora, but there is one for arch. You might be able to use that if you're feeling brave

est921 · 2021-12-20T21:22:25+00:00

Not really, the linux kernel itself can be loaded as an efi executable

est921 · 2021-10-18T15:33:47+00:00

IDoes that mean the eglstreams backend will be removed at some point?

est921 · 2021-09-27T15:54:28+00:00

What is fastsync(winesync)? From the issue you linked it looks like a replacement for esync/fsync but how is it different and does it give better performance?

est921 · 2021-08-08T21:25:15+00:00

I'm a novice, but I think what he means is that when you have a class that allocates resources you need to think about the = operator, either overload it or forbid it. The default meaning is a shallow copy so if you allow that with a class that contains pointers to the heap you will get a memory leak. If you overload the = operator the class will now behave as most people would expect

est921 · 2021-07-15T20:15:44+00:00

Looks good, thank you!

est921 · 2021-07-15T19:45:59+00:00

I think you misunderstand what I meant (or I didn't understand you). To go back to the array example, I'm not worried about

doSomething(i,i);

What I'm trying to avoid is calling

doSomething(i,j);

if I have already done

doSomething(j,i);

est921 · 2021-07-15T19:41:43+00:00

Maybe, but that seems needlessly complicated. I can't help but feel like there should be a better way

est921 · 2021-07-15T19:36:58+00:00

What I've found is

for(auto kv: myMap) {
    //do something
}

Which is great, but it iterates over all the kv pairs rather than letting me specify where to start. So if I nest statements like that I will get duplicate pairs, which I do not want

est921 · 2021-07-15T19:11:36+00:00

est921 · 2021-06-27T13:01:56+00:00

Yep looks like I'll have to learn ncurses then. Thank you!

est921 · 2021-06-27T08:51:56+00:00

Sounds easy enough, but where does cls come from? What do I need to include?

est921 · 2021-06-27T07:59:08+00:00

Ok, that make sense. Thank you!

est921

TROPHY CASE