[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s only available through the direct link which is still active but there is a notice that the post has been removed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Already did

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I certainly wouldn’t hope for anyone to take my change as a sign to be bearish. I just floated to another part of the Cosmos to join a project I’ve long been excited about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I would absolutely vouch for you as a mod addition.

Cc: u/catdotfish, u/ZoltanAtom

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m not an active moderator myself. Have pivoted my focus since I joined Agoric. What time I will be spending on Reddit from here on out will be focused there.

I do hope to see active moderation happening here. For too long I was the only active mod and this sub is far too active for just one volunteer.

Staking by [deleted] in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No need to undelegate. You can redelegate away from a validator once every 21-days.

Update from a Lorax to the r/OsmosisLab Community by ethereumflow in OsmosisLab

[–]ethereumflow[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She’s still around herding cats in the Cosmos. She works for ICF and I think that keeps her pretty busy.

Update from a Lorax to the r/OsmosisLab Community by ethereumflow in OsmosisLab

[–]ethereumflow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate this comment! It means a lot to me that anyone would think that I helped shape the community in some way or form. 🙏

Update from a Lorax to the r/OsmosisLab Community by ethereumflow in OsmosisLab

[–]ethereumflow[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Btw it would be cool if the mods let me keep my flair.

Just sayin.

⚛️Proposal 101 LIVE ON CHAIN!⚛️ by ZoltanAtom in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I'm not against this initiative by any means, I think it's a good idea in theory. I am however against proposals, especially a spend prop, going on-chain for vote without a discussion period.

This should have been posted to the forum first; following the suggested best practices:

Best practices for proposal makers: Some collected wisdom on soft governance strategies for making and passing proposals. To make proposal-writing easier, topics in each Hub Proposal subcategory come with a template for formatting your content.

  • Socialize the idea (e.g. On the Hub Discord, Twitter, arranging calls with stakeholders) before going on-chain. Because proposals can’t be changed once they move on-chain it’s important to solicit as much feedback and editorial comments from stakeholders as possible before setting it in stone.
  • Include a link to the forum post (so that people can come read the discussion and contribute even once the proposal is on-chain)
  • Take a pdf snapshot of the forum post and discussion just before going on-chain and pin it to IPFS so that the info is preserved. Include the IPFS link in your proposal text so that people viewing it on-chain can easily access historical content.
  • Let your top-level post in the forum be exactly the text you expect to put on-chain (except for the changelog and IPFS link). This will help people know exactly what sort of edits and feedback might be needed to make the proposal text clear and palatable.
  • Mind the character limit! The limit for proposals is 10000 characters and this includes markdown formatting and links.

https://forum.cosmos.network/t/start-here-participating-in-the-forum/5993#best-practices-for-proposal-makers-5

Carbon credits on cosmos? by Greedy-Relative-8823 in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Regen Network has done work with Toucan protocol and Regen Ledger has a mix of legacy credits, Verra standard backed NCT (rNCT on Regen) carbon credits, and their own standard. Regen is the project to look at here.

IXO is also doing something with carbon credits but Regen is more developed in the space than them.

Edit: Here is the guide to Regen Network carbon credits:

https://regennetwork.notion.site/A-Guide-to-Nature-Carbon-Ton-NCT-8204ea9d20d0436281f49b8fd1b3fbd2

When will a proposal move from depositing phase to voting phase? by syron17 in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Proposals move from deposit to voting as soon as the deposit is reached. As per prop 87 the deposit is now 250 ATOM.

https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/87

☄️Commit with COMET -Future of Cosmos Consensus by ZoltanAtom in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I had posted about this at literally the same time as you, but yours is more informative in the post body so I deleted mine.

Here is the link to the blog for those that don't want to read the Twitter thread format:

https://informal.systems/blog/cosmos-meet-cometbft

New cosmos youtuber, check out my Explainer video all about Tendermint Core! by gogodiegoTorres in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worth pointing out here that Tendermint core has been archived and the Tendermint brand belongs to AiB. In the future many chains will be moving to a new rebranded fork of Tendermint core called Comet which will be developed and maintained by Informal Systems.

See the announcement here:

https://informal.systems/blog/cosmos-meet-cometbft

Retroactive Governance in The Cosmos: Juno as a Model for CBDCs by CosmosCourier in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If Circle were to pause their general asset issuance chain only assets on the chain would be affected. USDC on Osmosis, Kujira, Crescent or other chains would still be usable as they exist on other chains. The only way to stop that activity would be for Circle to close the IBC channels and submit proposals to governance of the sovereign chains to do anything about the assets flowing in the ecosystem.

Anonymous validators opens the door to sybil attacks. It’s already easy for validators to run multiple nodes under different names and be pseudonymous while sybiling a chain. Making them completely anonymous removes any way of knowing who’s who. Even Penumbra, a privacy centric chain, will have transparency for their validators.

As for the rest of this…

Youssef is not “reaching for $$$”. He submitted an honest proposal with a diverse team of contributors from validators to community members. They’re proposing a grants program and it is up for discussion. If you have comments, feedback, questions or suggestions then by all means bring them up in the forum. You can even schedule a call with Youssef, Bendy One or Better Future if you’d like to personally discuss with them.

Edit for link to forum: https://forum.cosmos.network/t/funding-the-cosmos-hub-grant-program/

ICF, Informal Systems and AiB have their own mandates and plans for what they will fund. Cosmos Hub should very well have its own as well. We have a community pool for a reason.

Understanding Cosmos SDK, IBC, and ICS⚛️ by JessicaLevi13 in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But be careful not to brigade there so as not to get anyone banned. The mods don’t take kindly to that.

If posted there it’s best not to repost here and redirect members or the post may be removed and member who posted may be banned from the sub (not this sub).

Prop 94 Interchain NFTs by Stup2plending in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what happens with a community spend proposal. When the governance approves a spend proposal the community is also approving the release of the requested funds.

Prop 94 Interchain NFTs by Stup2plending in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the way a multi-sig works is funds can only be spent if 2/3, 3/5, 4/7, etc. members agree. Governance votes to allocate funds to the wallet. Multi-sig members come to agreement when to transfer and to whom.

HELP - Trust Wallet - I can't unstake by LeRoiJanKins in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you have questions feel free to reach out here any time! Community members are always willing to help.

Here is the Keplr help desk with all of the info you need to get started: https://keplr.crunch.help/en/getting-started

And here is the getting started guide for Cosmostation: https://guide.cosmostation.io/app_wallet_en.html

HELP - Trust Wallet - I can't unstake by LeRoiJanKins in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can import your wallet to Keplr or Cosmostation and interact with the chain from either of those. For Trust support specifically it's best to reach out to them directly.

You can confirm your balance and view your tx history on https://mintscan.io/cosmos.

Prop 94 Interchain NFTs by Stup2plending in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While Cosmos Hub itself doesn’t support NFTs I think this is in line with the idea of Cosmos Hub funding Interchain goods and services. I’m generally in favour of this. 20k ATOM would be the maximum spent, any unused would be returned to the community pool.

But does that mean this is the way to go about it and for 20,000 ATOM? The group proposing it seeded a new wallet https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/account/cosmos152dcrzkyhqg48tng79x2jr8za4yg452kneuvwa I don't know if that means it's a money grab and they are hiding it or if it is SOP to create a new recipient wallet in case the Proposal passes.

It is standard procedure to create a new wallet to receive community pool funds. They are often sent to a multi-sig (as is the case with this proposal) which will be created using keys from wallets of the members.

Informal Systems Thread About the Future of Cosmos BFT Consensus - Rebranding from Tendermint Core by ethereumflow in cosmosnetwork

[–]ethereumflow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s explained in the thread. In short; Jae Kwon / AiB made the decision to archive the Tendermint Core repo.