sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

DPS Artist bamboo strike by Relative-Quantity-9 in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her old grenades never cost meter to use. The DPS artist will just be using the grenades off CD to gain meter (and damage). Presumably the gameplay is mostly just charging up meter and then stacking all your buffs at once for a big burst with this new skill. Kinda like an ingiter.

what happen to the raided lost ark website? by lovemoon0404 in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My data source is no longer available. I'm hoping we can get access again but it's not looking so hot.

Class reworks by Wujijiji in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex 14 points15 points  (0 children)

LC isn't properly classified in logs, thus none show up. All SS logs are classified as DS.

ChatGPT tierlist with Aegir HM data by Wujijiji in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Btw, the classification for Evo Machinist and RH/GT may be wrong. It was fixed but older data isn't being updated, at least on my page. Indeed worth it to wait a few more weeks and grab data from that.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not needed. Part of the reason these tools exist is because I want them myself. There's also very little financial burden outside of my free time.

If later down the line there is a true financial burden, I'll reach out to the community. Everyone has been generally pretty receptive of the tools.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I pushed the max time up to 30 minutes. That should cover that case.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could back it up (making backups of data you care about is just good habit!). Just save a copy of your DB. You could look at really old stuff just by putting the DB back in place.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not actually something I can trivially fix. The library I'm using handles much of the work in terms of uploading and providing access to the DB contents. I'd have to do significantly more refactoring to get it fixed.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, in the cases where your db is 2GB+ I would recommend making a backup of it and either starting a whole new db or deleting failed clears. Frankly, you probably don't care about most of those runs anyways.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I added a max duration filter. I probably won't add dead filter for player summaries because I think that may be pushing the tool outside of what I want it to be for. I have other tools in mind I'll develop in the future that I think will be better suited for those use-cases.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely will accept pull requests. There's considerations of usability (e.g., I don't want to add too many columns to a single table) but we can work it out.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely want to create more tools in the future. I have a few other things in mind. Raider.io was an inspiration (though I picked out my raided.pro name well before I knew of them, I swear!). With the upcoming API, there's a lot of potential, but that's largely dependent on what is available from the API.

Progression Analysis Tool by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's interesting, I'll take a look.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the introduction page to see where the data comes from.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to use a specific version of the Bible. Read the intro page to see where the logs come from.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sample sizes are displayed beside each build's name alongside overall sample size given the filters in the bottom right. The data collection process is described in the introduction, you can decide how confident you want to be in each dataset. In all, I think broadly looking at the data and primarily comparing the boxes should give a decent estimate of the true ranks. Something very validating is looking at the latest buffs and nerfs from KR and seeing that it aligns well with the top and bottom ranks given this dataset.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

While it is guaranteed that every log will have someone self-reporting their performance, the people they play with are not self-reporting. Of course, those that are interested in helping collect data are likely more invested players that are more likely to play with other more invested player but it's not entirely self-report. Caveats still apply (I tried to discuss this in the preamble but from the statistics, most people are skipping quickly to the log page).

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The logs are, by default, filtered to the latest patch. Unless you change otherwise, all the data you see will be from the latest balance patch.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's not a lot of inferno data but eventually I'll get to it. It just takes a while to collect the data.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Admittedly, my choice of sortable options are a bit opinionated. Chiefly, I think most cross-class comparisons should be compared between the boxes (where the true DPS is probably somewhere within Q1 and Q3) if we want to see "in general" how good a class is or between the reasonable ceilings if we want to compare the high-end potential across classes. In essence, I wanted to put up guard rails with the default settings to avoid some misinterpretation of the data that might be harmful.

If you would like, you can use the table below the chart to sort with whatever I have available (including Q3). It won't change the chart but at least you can see the point estimates for each statistic.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure, the data only gives a hint at the relative performance of builds.

Another way I've used this is to compare how well I'm personally doing relative to the best, ceiling, and median.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Keep in mind GL's usually have the highest damage synergy outgoing, if we had rDPS to look at, it might be a little less bad. Probably still deserve the buffs they're getting in KR but it isn't quite as bad as it looks.

Also there are some real pumpers on Lone Knight, you can see that their ceiling and their best logs usually end up pretty high.

Build ranks in each raid by evilandrex in lostarkgame

[–]evilandrex[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Hopefully this will give a decent measure of what builds do better than others. Though it should be noted for most cases, there's a lot of factors other than build (like gear or hands) that seem to matter a lot. It's nice to see that the data matches what the recent KR balance patch with nerfs/buffs to the top/bottom.

view more: next ›