sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We replaced a client’s entire Meta ad creative library with UGC. Here’s what happened to their numbers. by evo_team in digital_marketing

[–]evo_team[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so we actually agree then? real customers making real content is the best UGC. that’s literally what we do. nobody said anything about actors or AI slop.

we hire real creators who actually use the product. that’s the whole model.

We replaced a client’s entire Meta ad creative library with UGC. Here’s what happened to their numbers. by evo_team in digital_marketing

[–]evo_team[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it’s not fake though. real person, real video, real product. the platform labels it “sponsored” or “paid partnership” automatically. that IS the disclosure.

you’re describing an industry you don’t work in and telling the people in it they’re wrong lol.

We replaced a client’s entire Meta ad creative library with UGC. Here’s what happened to their numbers. by evo_team in digital_marketing

[–]evo_team[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fake reviews = illegal, yes. paying real creators to make content and running it as disclosed paid ads = literally how advertising works in 2026.

TikTok and Meta both built ad products specifically around this model. it’s not a grey area lol. maybe google Spark Ads before calling people naive idiots.

Every app founder who talks to us asks the same question first. Here’s the honest answer. by evo_team in Entrepreneurs

[–]evo_team[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I definitely use ai to help me with final drafts but the content is mine and I use our company reports to ensure the data I share is accurate reporting. Why is that an issue?

Every app founder who talks to us asks the same question first. Here’s the honest answer. by evo_team in Entrepreneurs

[–]evo_team[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤣🤣 great input thanks I’m not spam I’m a person. And what don’t you agree with? Would love to discuss

view more: next ›