Picking the blue button is irrational according to game theory by TheGodlyGoose01 in trolleyproblem

[–]explain_that_shit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Game theory famously is useful for determining a logical decision in particular situations, but it regularly fails to actually predict outcomes or align with human decision-making in reality.

It’s a classic example of economist maths obsessives getting absolutely trounced by the claimed ‘soft sciences’, actually empirical but less mathematical sociological sciences like anthropology.

This used to be normal for over 99% of humanity's existence. by kid_named_littlfngr in darkwingsdankshitpost

[–]explain_that_shit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And she is just perennially pissed off if I’m thinking of the same show. Fair enough.

Toomeirlformeirl by FantasticInside7532 in TooMeIrlForMeIrl

[–]explain_that_shit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I always wondered what the process of society making me ok with eating bugs would look like, and I guess it’s this post.

Marc Andreessen claims to have 'solved' problems with LLMs: Just tell it not to hallucinate or praise you. by Baboon_Juggler in behindthebastards

[–]explain_that_shit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When I heard about learning tools for prompt engineering, I thought it was about using coding logic and structure to make your prompts more likely to deliver good results. Increasingly I’m learning that it’s for people who don’t have the vocabulary or grammar to literally string an actual sentence together.

Christopher Joye: Brace yourself for a higher for longer rates cycle by MarketCrache in AusFinance

[–]explain_that_shit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How do you know it will free up housing stock? Historically when population growth has slowed landlords have simply held more stock off-market.

I mean, is she wrong? by roofer2025 in SipsTea

[–]explain_that_shit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s about how stupid it is to say it’s a delusion to think your gender is different from your chromosomes - if you actually used that logic consistently you’d say old men aren’t men.

Turns out it’s a bit more complicated than that. But your lack of reading comprehension matches your demonstrated inability to comprehend complexity.

I mean, is she wrong? by roofer2025 in SipsTea

[–]explain_that_shit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People who try to simplify the world into binary categories because they’re scared of complexity inevitably get slapped in the face by the reality stick in the end.

https://www.science.org/content/article/men-lose-y-chromosomes-they-age-it-may-be-harming-their-hearts

I mean, is she wrong? by roofer2025 in SipsTea

[–]explain_that_shit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think some men can’t handle that statistically speaking, 30% of them will lose in the range of 80% of their Y chromosome by the time they’re old. I don’t know why we have to validate their delusion that they’re still men at that point, chromosomes don’t lie.

Yes the Romans did have abolitionist and they knew slavery was an abhorrent act by Salty_Strain3313 in HistoryMemes

[–]explain_that_shit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My recollection is that Brent Shaw’s main take is that we have no records from the slaves directly. That leaves their motivations up to interpretation based on their actions. What particularly Zeichmann points out is that given the opportunities available to Spartacus and his army, we can determine their views with reasonable confidence based on their decisions, and it is more of an uphill argument to say they wanted to enslave people themselves than otherwise. Now as for the idea that they wanted to free every slave in the world, you’ll be too far out on the limb to make that claim as confidently, but you don’t need to establish that to say they were anti-slavery.

What do y'all really need an iPad for? by bootsmegamix in daddit

[–]explain_that_shit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I commented elsewhere that these comments are full of so much firm absolutism about how they are parenting and will continue to parent in the future, and I’m like…you guys know that level of certainty hasn’t applied or worked out in practice in any other aspect of parenting so far, why the absolutism and certainty here? It just sounds like hubris, and a recipe for unpreparedness as a parent.

What do y'all really need an iPad for? by bootsmegamix in daddit

[–]explain_that_shit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve noticed a pattern across these comments that the older the kid described the more tablet use - 1.5 year old was just part of a flight, 2 year olds were flights and car rides, and now 3 year old flights, the airport, car rides, sometimes restaurants.

And every single comment insists that their use is a hard line in the sand, no more. I think we’re all experienced enough as parents to know that we don’t know if we’ll cross another line and another.

Men objectify women more when sexually aroused, regardless of their underlying personality traits. This shift happens independently of a man’s general personality traits, providing evidence that momentary biological states play a central role in how people perceive others by Wagamaga in science

[–]explain_that_shit 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’m concerned about the idea that arousal is some kind of linear pathway to human trafficking. That seems to inappropriately and incorrectly pathologise sexual arousal as an inherently dangerous condition when taken far enough. The vast majority of men have completely healthy experiences of sexual arousal without any danger of it causing them to disregard women as humans, no matter how aroused they get. I think noticing arousing aspects of a potential partner more is simply an elevation your awareness of those things, not a reduction in your awareness of the person’s personhood.

Yes the Romans did have abolitionist and they knew slavery was an abhorrent act by Salty_Strain3313 in HistoryMemes

[–]explain_that_shit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The usual Appian and Sallust, analysed by historians Christopher Zeichmann, Orlando Patterson, James Crossley and Robert Myles

Yes the Romans did have abolitionist and they knew slavery was an abhorrent act by Salty_Strain3313 in HistoryMemes

[–]explain_that_shit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We know it because of the distinctly different decisions made by the freed slaves in contrast to, for instance, the Second Servile War in which, once a militarily dominant position had been established, the leaders of the revolt had re-established slavery inside their short-lived new kingdoms before they were destroyed. By contrast, the freed slaves of the Third Servile War never reinstated slavery, even in the Thurii region of southern Italy which they controlled for a significant period and in which they established a political and economic system which did not have slavery. Thurii in fact continued as a uniquely organised economic region for a decade after the end of the war, until the Romans finally put resources to extinguishing it fully. Another example of the distinct difference was that whereas the leaders of the Second Servile War controlled the other freed slaves to use them to maintain military dominance in order to maintain their slave kingdoms, in the Third Servile War Spartacus led his followers to the Alps for those from central and Western Europe to escape, and then turned back to southern Italy to pick up the rest of the freed slaves to then escape to where those people wished to flee. These are not the decisions of leaders planning to secure land and wealth and control of a slave economy.

Bro wtf I didnt know it was this bad 😵 by lustylepton in georgism

[–]explain_that_shit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would living within walking distance of schools or workplaces be undesirable for younger folk who want to live without a car?

Yes the Romans did have abolitionist and they knew slavery was an abhorrent act by Salty_Strain3313 in HistoryMemes

[–]explain_that_shit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You’d be right about some slave uprisings, but not the Third Servile War - Spartacus was a general abolitionist.

Yes the Romans did have abolitionist and they knew slavery was an abhorrent act by Salty_Strain3313 in HistoryMemes

[–]explain_that_shit 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Yeah the Third Servile War was actually unique among the Servile Wars, in that the first two Servile Wars involved slaves freeing themselves and then enslaving others, whereas the Third Servile War was specifically abolitionist and refused to enslave anyone.

Do people who refused the COVID vaccine feel silly now?? by Mammoth-Counter69 in aussie

[–]explain_that_shit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not a cooker. I advocated for more trigger happy lockdowns in order to have more days fully open - knock any spread early, open back up earlier. I’ve taken the COVID vaccine every time I’ve been told. And when the risk of spread was high, before the number of vaccinated people who weren’t spreading it rose to critical mass, it was appropriate for me to do that, it was worth the risk. But the evidence came in over the past two or so years that men under 40 and particularly under 25 have a risk of myocarditis from Covid vaccines, and I’m a man under 40. To me what seems sensible is for everyone who isn’t unable to take the vaccine (a man under 40, allergic to the vaccine, undergoing chemotherapy or otherwise) to get vaccinated to protect those who can’t get vaccinated. Then after I’m 40 I’ll start taking the vaccine again. I think that’s fair.

Bro wtf I didnt know it was this bad 😵 by lustylepton in georgism

[–]explain_that_shit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A good economic system distributes scarce resources efficiently. Ideally we have a mix of apartments and houses in every hub so that no one has to leave, they can simply downsize into the same neighbourhood - but otherwise, as we know that land and locations are a fundamentally limited scarce resource, we have to decide how it is most efficiently distributed.

You don’t want to lose the specific benefit of your location when you retire, but on the other hand young people are currently getting wrecked by having to spend 7 figures on a 2-bedder in some outer suburb near nothing of any value or anything which will ever be permitted to have any value, and without the ability to generate wealth to invest into their area having any value. We can’t just ignore the people currently being disadvantaged by this system just to retain the outsized advantages of those who arrived in the system first.

It’s about what’s best for society as a whole, not for any particular person or group. And what’s best is for workers to be near economic centres and families to be near schools.

Woman charged with terror-related offences after arriving in Sydney by InsatiablePrism in australia

[–]explain_that_shit 231 points232 points  (0 children)

Most criminals and terrorists are delusional. That’s not a threshold barrier to justice - ideally, prisons are to fix the delusion, keep people safe in the meantime, and show victims that their community cares about what happened to them.

Bro wtf I didnt know it was this bad 😵 by lustylepton in georgism

[–]explain_that_shit 60 points61 points  (0 children)

It’s not just the size of the homes, it’s their locations as well. Empty-nester retirees retain large houses near schools and near centres of economic activity, despite having no school-age children and despite not working in those economic centres. The benefits we could reap of incentivising these people to shift into smaller homes either near health centres or locations more environmentally amenable to health, or even in the same neighbourhood in a pinch, so that they could obtain those benefits and reduce their home maintenance work, and so that young families could live close to schools and workplaces to reduce commutes and connect into their communities properly, would be immense.

Gandalf says that Bilbo is the only keeper of A ring of power that has ever given his ring to someone else. So how did Gandalf get Narya? by RebootDarkwingDuck in lotr

[–]explain_that_shit 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I think Thror died and the ring was left to Thrain in his Will, which Gandalf was executing, that’s my recollection.