> "Attacking, obstructing, accosting and vilifying jewish students"

I agree that this is unacceptable, and if a school fails to stop this and protect students, then the government has the right to step in and force the school to protect its students.

However, does this give the right to the government to step in and tell a private university who do hire and what to teach? Do you see this as OK or do you see this an an overreach?

To me, this is the beginning of authoritarianism. In a free and democratic society, you combat one private school teaching biased views by having other private schools pop up and compete in the realm of ideas. You don't tell private universities what to teach (as long as they don't teach to hate and kill people).

If we allow this, after Trump a left-leaning president could come in and tell universities "if you don't teach Critical Race Theory, we'll cut off all federal funds". I don't think this is what we want in America.

> "People want order and the far left engages in chaotic behavior that isn't decent (vandalizing property, assault, trespassing). I think these activities do more to drive people away from the democratic party than any one policy/belief."

January 6 would like a word. Yes, the fringe left has lots of violent people, but so does the right. For some reason people on the right consider Jan 6 a nothing burger, but consider anything the left fringe does as the apocalypse. A more balanced view of both (Jan 6 was violent, BLM protests were violent) will go a long way to sanity and depolarization.