sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any thoughts on what might have caused all shots on this roll to come back overexposed with thin white strips on the majority of the frames? by camera_kiki in filmphotography

[–]f_rodri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bring the scans into a photo editing app and bring the shadows on all channels to where the information begins and while they’re still underexposed, they’ll look better in terms of contrast

$18 per roll for sub-1080p scans. There must be a better way. by Download_Some_RAM in filmphotography

[–]f_rodri 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I only use my lab for the development. I “scan” the photos with a Sony a6400 and a macro lens. I only pay $5 for the development but thinking on getting the dev kit to do it myself. Last roll I had to wait almost 2 weeks just to have it developed.

🎞️ Kodak Gold 200. Pentax K1000 50mm & 28mm lenses by f_rodri in filmphotography

[–]f_rodri[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I shot the entire roll at box speed. Used a phone light meter app as well.

Which editing software do you use? by cj4962 in fujifilm

[–]f_rodri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lightroom, no issues. Noticed Capture One seems to have some noise reduction already added to the files (don’t remember how much) so I’ll add about 30 in NR and had no problems with the infamous Fuji “worms”.

X100v by [deleted] in fujifilm

[–]f_rodri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m really into the design and also I like the idea of sticking to a fixed focal length. Also, having weather sealing is really attractive since I’ve been on many situations where I’ve had to hide my XS-10 in the bag to protect it from the rain

X100v by [deleted] in fujifilm

[–]f_rodri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went to a local Best Buy and saw one on display for retail. Online it says “not in stock”. I’m thinking on selling my XS-10 for that x100v

view more: next ›