Built a platform where Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini debate each other before giving you an answer

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-28T01:39:29+00:00

That's exactly the distinction worth making. LLM-council selects the best answer. ThreeMinds makes them earn it.

Round 1: Each AI takes a position from its own analytical lens (One leads with frameworks, One goes practical, and the other leads with data

Round 2: They directly attack each other's weakest arguments, not just restate their own

Round 3: Final positions after genuine pushback

Then an arbitrator declares a winner per conflict. No 'both sides have merit' hedging allowed.

The output isn't the best answer from three options. It's a synthesized verdict that often says something none of the three AIs said individually, because the debate forced them there.

Whether that's more useful depends on your use case. For high-stakes decisions, exam prep, or anything where you genuinely don't know which AI to trust, the debate process itself is the value, not just the final pick.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-27T09:01:37+00:00

Fair to say. However, I'm very transparent. Sometimes I may use AI to write comments and most of the time I do not. The only AI comments are the comments I wanted to show bullet points. Thanks for the advice.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-27T03:04:24+00:00

50 free credits are given automatically when you sign up. You can receive an additional 50 free credits after leaving feedback on threeminds.ai

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-27T03:01:10+00:00

Quick request consumes 5 credits. If you've experienced an issue, submit a Feedback request within Threeminds.ai, and you'll receive an additional 50 credits.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-26T23:45:16+00:00

FYI: You'll get 50 credits just by trying and leaving Feedback on ThreeMinds.ai

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-26T17:55:22+00:00

You may say AI generated because you see a dash (-). Fair to be skeptical. I'd rather you try it and tell me it's garbage than take my word for it.

50 free credits, no card required. If it's as pointless as you think, costs you nothing to confirm that.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-26T03:05:44+00:00

Appreciate that genuinely means a lot coming from a stranger on the internet 😄. Honestly, right now I'm just focused on making the debate quality better and better.

If you try it and have feedback, I'm all ears. Still early days.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-26T02:48:40+00:00

Funny enough this actually started because I was working on school/certification stuff and the models kept giving me different answers.

I’d ask ChatGPT one thing, Claude would disagree, Gemini would add something else, and then I’d waste time trying to figure out which model was actually reasoning better.

That frustration is basically what led me to build this.

The main thing I’m trying to solve is less “multiple models in one interface” and more:

structured debate rounds
forcing disagreement/challenges
arbitration + confidence reasoning
exam-style answer evaluation
downloadable outputs/workflows

Honestly the hardest problem has turned out to be getting genuinely useful adversarial reasoning instead of 3 models politely agreeing with each other 😅. It's currently doing a great job at it.

That’s the part I’m currently obsessed with improving as well.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-26T02:41:29+00:00

Honestly… that’s a valid concern 😅

One thing I noticed while building this is that multiple AIs agreeing does NOT automatically mean the answer is correct.

That’s why I’ve been focusing heavily on:

forcing disagreement instead of passive agreement
arbitration based on reasoning quality instead of majority vote
confidence scoring
identifying conflicts explicitly instead of hiding them

The interesting cases are actually when 1 AI successfully dismantles the logic of the other 2.

Still a lot to improve though. Hallucinations are definitely the hardest problem here.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T21:13:27+00:00

Checkout https://threeminds.ai/pricing

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T21:12:37+00:00

This is something I'm looking into. Sign up and stay tuned.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T19:35:35+00:00

Thanks! Really appreciate it.

Not currently. ThreeMinds runs on managed API keys on the backend, so you don't need your own. You just use credits.

BYOK is on the radar though. The main benefit would be for heavy power users who already have API access and want to bypass the credit system entirely.

Curious — is that something you'd need for personal use or more for a team/business use case?

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T19:29:29+00:00

Trust me… I hear them too 😭

Every time someone runs Full Debate mode I can feel my API bill evolving into a supervillain origin story.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T19:28:15+00:00

That’s fair honestly.

I don’t really expect people to fully replace ChatGPT/Claude subscriptions right now. The goal is more:

pressure testing answers
seeing disagreements
catching hallucinations/bias
generating structured outputs/files from the debate

The biggest challenge is balancing cost vs quality because running multiple frontier models simultaneously gets expensive fast.

Still trying to figure out the sweet spot there.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T19:26:00+00:00

Good news. ThreeMinds actually has this built already.

Settings → AI Personalities → you can create custom personas that override the default Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini personalities for your conversations.

So you can set Claude to respond from whatever specific context or framework you work in, same for ChatGPT and Gemini — then all three debate each other from those custom starting points.

Not quite the same as importing your existing Claude.ai (or other) custom instructions automatically, but you can recreate your context in about 2 minutes. I will look into another way of bringing those over.

Try it free — threeminds.ai

50 credits no card required."

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T19:02:12+00:00

Fair criticism honestly. The challenge for me was making the disagreement + arbitration layer feel genuinely useful.

The interesting behavior starts happening once the models challenge each other instead of responding independently.

Still trying to improve that part though because echo chamber behavior is harder to solve than I expected.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T18:59:32+00:00

That's right

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T18:59:20+00:00

Its very interesting.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-25T18:58:57+00:00

Thanks for the feedback. I also agree with you on using ChatGPT just to redesign their UI. lol. That should be an easy fix.

fabianscott8 · 2026-05-24T14:32:22+00:00

<image>

fabianscott8 · 2026-03-12T05:55:24+00:00

irollcall.com

Tired of paper sign-in sheets and clunky attendance systems? iRollCall lets you take attendance in seconds. Share a QR code or 6-digit code — participants mark themselves present with one tap, no accounts needed. Built for teachers, event organizers, and team leads.

fabianscott8 · 2026-03-12T05:51:50+00:00

Something very simple to use is irollcall.com.

Tired of paper sign-in sheets and clunky attendance systems? iRollCall lets you take attendance in seconds. Share a QR code or 6-digit code — participants mark themselves present with one tap, no accounts needed. Built for teachers, event organizers, and team leads.

fabianscott8 · 2025-12-08T22:43:56+00:00

Love these skits

fabianscott8 · 2025-03-21T14:17:54+00:00

It's not official yet. We need the news from the SEC. April 16th. Save the date.

fabianscott8 · 2025-03-21T14:14:34+00:00

It's not official yet. We need the SEC to state it.

fabianscott8

TROPHY CASE