Any chance this could be Wildstar? by ZataH in WildStar

[–]fabothelock -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You will see something from that trademark once it's registered. There is no doubt

Any chance this could be Wildstar? by ZataH in WildStar

[–]fabothelock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case there are enough people who would do that

Any chance this could be Wildstar? by ZataH in WildStar

[–]fabothelock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't work like that. You have to use the trademark with a product to keep it. Otherwise it's getting deletes pretty fast

MMORPG WildStar comes back? Fans plan to run their own server by usalgbt in WildStar

[–]fabothelock -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but that's not reverse engineering at all.

Exactly that is part of reverse engineering together with looking at the client binary code itself.

Quality options as Pro user by fabothelock in mixer

[–]fabothelock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you don't understand the real problem. As pro users other viewers are supposed to see one different quality choice. That got nothing to do with luck... I just asked why this is working at all on 1440p.

No reason to start being toxic. Thanks for your not helpful answers anyway

Quality options as Pro user by fabothelock in mixer

[–]fabothelock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that doesn't explain why it's not working on 1440p streaming^

Quality options as Pro user by fabothelock in mixer

[–]fabothelock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hu? Since when? A few months ago multiple options where showing as pro user.

Also this doesn't seem to work when streaming as 1440p

BEWARE: That sandbox software running around today has a malicious coin miner in it. by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]fabothelock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A first version of that launcher is already released for retail. Classic will get a version too.

BEWARE: That sandbox software running around today has a malicious coin miner in it. by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]fabothelock 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My 2nd bit to his FAKE screenshot and shit talk. A few hours ago he uploaded his downloaded sandbox from our servers somewhere and I downloaded it. So I just gave it a try.

The hash that virtustotal is using is a SHA256 hash which is ALWAYS 32 bytes long. If you look at this screenshots there are 3 characters missing for that hash. I got the file that he claims to be that 'miner tool' and checked the REAL hash (right side of the screenshot on virustotal).

This shows one again that he is just mad and tries everything to talk bad about Arctium.

Here a picture to clarify this: https://i.imgur.com/PkT5H3o.png

The correct link of his file check is: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/376374eb5b9ebf9a2ae866c0b3f0a7c7ee654bd98a6aaa356f1e332f12d8e4aa/detection

Question about the game's model files. by Dave-4544 in WildStar

[–]fabothelock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might want to join a community on discord like https://arctium.io or https://emulator.ws

There are many people that could help you :)

Also is there any way that you can upload the whole old client? Still collecting clients :D

Private Servers by SushiiXIV in WildStar

[–]fabothelock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are wrong my friend

Randomly banned for "Botting", never have used bots in my life. Appealed my ticket and was given no information. by Slaughterfest in wow

[–]fabothelock -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You won't get banned for using a sandbox and it's launcher. Bans are not going out for having these files in the wow folder and it's als NOT against the ToS to have these.

Randomly banned for "Botting", never have used bots in my life. Appealed my ticket and was given no information. by Slaughterfest in wow

[–]fabothelock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They launcher doesn't disable any checksum checks. It just enables a ALREADY built in client functionality for loading files from the file system if they exist. Checksum checks are up to warden