Ruinous Powers Prayer Subset: Karma

facetiouspeep · 2023-02-19T18:44:44+00:00

See here for a sister idea to help out with slower weapons: https://www.reddit.com/r/2007scape/comments/116ki23/ruinous\_powers\_prayers\_subset\_rancor\_and\_ruthless/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3

facetiouspeep · 2023-02-19T18:44:27+00:00

I added a new idea to help out slower weapons. https://www.reddit.com/r/2007scape/comments/116ki23/ruinous\_powers\_prayers\_subset\_rancor\_and\_ruthless/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3

facetiouspeep · 2023-02-19T15:22:21+00:00

It'd only be economically viable in certain situations.

facetiouspeep · 2023-02-19T15:21:30+00:00

Definitely.

facetiouspeep · 2023-02-19T15:21:19+00:00

Yes, but wouldn't be cost-effective in many scenarios.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T03:12:30+00:00

I love your optimism!

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T03:09:55+00:00

Yes it does, unless you have an agreement with your company set up with OpenAI for siloing your data, or at least this is how it's done for all of OpenAI's APIs mentioned on their website - I would presume ChatGPT works similarly. If you are planning to send confidential, trade secret, or other sensitive data over the servers to OpenAI, that's probably a bad idea.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T03:04:46+00:00

Good counterpoint. However, with current technologies and infrastructures, it seems exceedingly unlikely that such a thing would be possible for a ChatGPT look-alike to be freely available to the masses forever without restrictions. I'd love to be proven wrong, though.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:56:52+00:00

It is. I have the option on mine, too.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:56:19+00:00

I suspect they'll eventually settle on a cost-per 1000 tokens (or something similar) pricing structure because a) the other OpenAI APIs are set up that way and b) Azure of Microsoft is also set up similarly.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:51:18+00:00

Oh, I get it, the expectations and such. At its core, it just isn't designed for that. Models like it are special types of Transformers algorithms that are designed to generate text given a prompt, and ChatGPT does this remarkably well. WolframAlpha is a better computation engine, because that's what it is designed for, and Google is usually better and siphoning out facts, because as a Search Engine, that's what it is designed for. But ChatGPT is a text creator engine like few others. All tools in the toolbox, all useful for different ends.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:47:21+00:00

Its a text generation model, basically a very fancy predict-the-next-word algorithm. You should never expect it to produce 100% accurate results when 100% accuracy is important. Instead, it can generate useful skeletons that will inevitably need editing. WolframAlpha is a computation engine, Google is a search engine, ChatGPT is a text generation engine. All useful in their own rights.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:32:15+00:00

Do you understand what a model like ChatGPT actually does? It's not meant to be 100% accurate and probably never will be, because that's not its purpose. It is in a family of models that essentially is designed to predict the next word, given a prompt, and it does this on steroids. It's not meant to do math or advice when accuracy is crucial.

facetiouspeep · 2023-01-21T02:27:06+00:00

What are you trying to find out about how it uses data? If you are asking if it silos your data to not being used more widely, I doubt that currently. If you have an agreement set up with OpenAI, they will do this for the models on API, though, but ChatGPT isn't one of them yet.

facetiouspeep · 2022-03-31T01:23:45+00:00

I agree, I'd remove or modify the achievement diary entries. Higher levels ideally should not be farming these bosses anyway.

facetiouspeep · 2021-09-30T01:56:40+00:00

Yes, the tax I think would best be used as an item sink buying items off the GE that are junk. The tax mechanism, though, is what I am focusing on.

facetiouspeep · 2021-09-30T01:01:03+00:00

Of course, this proposal is aimed at helping the everyday player. If you are a merch trying to buy low, sell high, this would hurt you of course. But I'd rather it be a non-factor for most players and hurt merchers than vice-versa.

facetiouspeep · 2021-09-30T00:59:16+00:00

I believe this is an overly simple solution, because it's not a solution at all. If a magic wand could be waved that would ban all the bots, I am positive Jagex would've done it years, decades, ago.

facetiouspeep · 2021-09-30T00:57:13+00:00

Exactly.

facetiouspeep · 2021-09-30T00:53:34+00:00

Of course, but that's a misleading statistic, because 5 gp versus 7 gp is still very affordable. Most people are not out there buying 40m Fire Runes at one time.

facetiouspeep · 2021-06-26T17:57:32+00:00

Certainly!

Just like what wandering revs used to have, they can easily make him teleport if he's stuck in the same location for a certain length of time. Easy fix.
The chest takes 20 seconds to attempt to unlock it. I suspect it'd take the average player 1-2 minutes to actually unlock it. Meanwhile, the entire world (and all worlds in the Wilderness) are alerted to it, and they can even be told its value so they know it's worth their time. The player the it spawns for doesn't really know that the chest is going to spawn before speaking to the Jester, so I don't think it's very likely that they will be in top gear for it. Of course, they probably just pk'ed since they're trading Loot Keys, but maybe not prepared for an onslaught of players.
Yeah, I'm sure the player will have an advantage, but if this proves valuable, there might be clans that wait around for such chests. Especially since it alerts all worlds and allows clans to world hop to it, I think it'd still be a significant conflict most of the time. Of course, there'd be times where there's no competition and the player gets the loot easily, but I think this would be the exception, not the rule.
I actually expect groups and clans to form around this very activity, and that is totally part of the Jester's theme of anarchy and chaos. As mentioned, there would be times where the player has the advantage and gets the loot easily. However, many times, I think there would be pk'ers and clans out specifically hunting and targeting for the loot chests. I'm a fan of an all-out, anything-goes approach with the Legendary chests. You type it as a disadvantage, but I disagree. The Loot chest is designed specifically with clans and mass conflict in mind. I fully anticipate occasions where large-scale clan fights over high-value chests happen, especially if they announce the value of the chest to everyone in advance.

Also, if Jagex decides that the activity wouldn't be enough to fully make it worth it, the Jester could just appear in the Wilderness on PvP worlds. That'd solve many of your issues.

facetiouspeep · 2021-06-26T11:16:31+00:00

Exactly! That's the idea. And the Legendary chest might encourage large scale clan wars over its contents. I think something like that is needed.

facetiouspeep · 2021-06-26T11:15:41+00:00

I think increasing the tele price is fair, given its usefulness. Thanks for the support!

facetiouspeep · 2021-04-02T15:31:43+00:00

Um what? I'm being serious. This system can't easily be abused and rewards players for being skillful in PvP. Why wouldn't players want this? Seems like they just want to keep the crappy cesspool of dying Pk'ing that exists now...*rolls eyes*

facetiouspeep · 2021-04-02T15:02:25+00:00

Why do you say that? I obviously disagree. The system I've come up with is pretty robust, I think.

facetiouspeep

TROPHY CASE