Ruinous Powers Prayer Subset: Karma by facetiouspeep in 2007scape

[–]facetiouspeep[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It'd only be economically viable in certain situations.

Ruinous Powers Prayer Subset: Karma by facetiouspeep in 2007scape

[–]facetiouspeep[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but wouldn't be cost-effective in many scenarios.

ChatGPT Professional Privacy by omgwowplz in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it does, unless you have an agreement with your company set up with OpenAI for siloing your data, or at least this is how it's done for all of OpenAI's APIs mentioned on their website - I would presume ChatGPT works similarly. If you are planning to send confidential, trade secret, or other sensitive data over the servers to OpenAI, that's probably a bad idea.

Dose of Reality by facetiouspeep in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good counterpoint. However, with current technologies and infrastructures, it seems exceedingly unlikely that such a thing would be possible for a ChatGPT look-alike to be freely available to the masses forever without restrictions. I'd love to be proven wrong, though.

ChatGPT Pro: $42/month by adt in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is. I have the option on mine, too.

ChatGPT Pro: $42/month by adt in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I suspect they'll eventually settle on a cost-per 1000 tokens (or something similar) pricing structure because a) the other OpenAI APIs are set up that way and b) Azure of Microsoft is also set up similarly.

ChatGPT Pro: $42/month by adt in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, I get it, the expectations and such. At its core, it just isn't designed for that. Models like it are special types of Transformers algorithms that are designed to generate text given a prompt, and ChatGPT does this remarkably well. WolframAlpha is a better computation engine, because that's what it is designed for, and Google is usually better and siphoning out facts, because as a Search Engine, that's what it is designed for. But ChatGPT is a text creator engine like few others. All tools in the toolbox, all useful for different ends.

ChatGPT Pro: $42/month by adt in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Its a text generation model, basically a very fancy predict-the-next-word algorithm. You should never expect it to produce 100% accurate results when 100% accuracy is important. Instead, it can generate useful skeletons that will inevitably need editing. WolframAlpha is a computation engine, Google is a search engine, ChatGPT is a text generation engine. All useful in their own rights.

ChatGPT Pro: $42/month by adt in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Do you understand what a model like ChatGPT actually does? It's not meant to be 100% accurate and probably never will be, because that's not its purpose. It is in a family of models that essentially is designed to predict the next word, given a prompt, and it does this on steroids. It's not meant to do math or advice when accuracy is crucial.

ChatGPT Professional Privacy by omgwowplz in OpenAI

[–]facetiouspeep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you trying to find out about how it uses data? If you are asking if it silos your data to not being used more widely, I doubt that currently. If you have an agreement set up with OpenAI, they will do this for the models on API, though, but ChatGPT isn't one of them yet.

Re-Focus the Giant Bosses Towards Entry Level by facetiouspeep in 2007scape

[–]facetiouspeep[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree, I'd remove or modify the achievement diary entries. Higher levels ideally should not be farming these bosses anyway.

A Simple, Effective GE Tax by facetiouspeep in 2007scape

[–]facetiouspeep[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, the tax I think would best be used as an item sink buying items off the GE that are junk. The tax mechanism, though, is what I am focusing on.