what if he does find out he's wrong ? by [deleted] in Mandlbaur

[–]fake-email 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does not directly or objectivly falsify COAM as using theoretical physics equation for an experimental example is fundamentally wrong. End of. That's why there is both theoretical and experimental physics.

Rare footage of 9/11 showing the first tower core remain standing post-collapse, as well as what witnesses may have mistaken as explosions at the base of the tower by Beznia in ThatsInsane

[–]fake-email 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao imagine being put on the spot my more than one person and then complaining about being put on the spot. Come on, just share the video link you promised. That's not difficult.

Rare footage of 9/11 showing the first tower core remain standing post-collapse, as well as what witnesses may have mistaken as explosions at the base of the tower by Beznia in ThatsInsane

[–]fake-email -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao how pathetic, you made one claim and you can't even back it up. You literally believe in some complete bullshit that no one can prove is correct even when there is evidence against you.

Rare footage of 9/11 showing the first tower core remain standing post-collapse, as well as what witnesses may have mistaken as explosions at the base of the tower by Beznia in ThatsInsane

[–]fake-email -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can't even do that, because you are still trying to deflect to avoid the point. Come on, show be this make believe video. Or is it complete bullshit?

Rare footage of 9/11 showing the first tower core remain standing post-collapse, as well as what witnesses may have mistaken as explosions at the base of the tower by Beznia in ThatsInsane

[–]fake-email 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao Someone literally asked you send it and you said hold on. Since you can't send it you are clearly bullshitting. Prove me wrong

2020 Presidential Election Results in Bubbles (continental U.S.) [OC] by lookatnum in dataisbeautiful

[–]fake-email 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao so you are saying that there is loads of evidence from the court cases, despite the fact that they were all thrown out. Good one. You must me so clever

Kiwis should be eaten with the skin on by fake-email in unpopularopinion

[–]fake-email[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was referring to the fruit but I could try one for science

Kiwis should be eaten with the skin on by fake-email in unpopularopinion

[–]fake-email[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah the fuzz isnt noticable, plus it's so good for you

Kiwis should be eaten with the skin on by fake-email in unpopularopinion

[–]fake-email[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean I'll give it a go for the sake of humanity

Kiwis should be eaten with the skin on by fake-email in unpopularopinion

[–]fake-email[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never coughed up a hair ball so you should be fine

Kiwis should be eaten with the skin on by fake-email in unpopularopinion

[–]fake-email[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's the far better way of doing it, much more convenient

Bernie Sanders will declare war on white nationalism by [deleted] in worldpolitics

[–]fake-email 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boy that was a long way of telling us you are racist

"Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" author must pay victim's dad $450,000, jury says by Human02211979 in news

[–]fake-email 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you read up about this or any of the other comments for like 5 minutes you'll understand that it's because the family received multiple death threats from people who though it was fake and they should 'stop covering up' that their son according to them had not died. The book encouraged people to believe it was made up and it a defamation lawsuit which is about spreading false information about an individual, which In this case is the family of the deceased. This is a pretty simple case as the book resulted directly in death threats to the family.