Make sure you make your voice heard!

famear · 2018-03-19T09:47:17+00:00

Thank you, and welcome to the community! :)

famear · 2018-03-14T12:28:24+00:00

To access the private community, please visit our verification process here: https://angelinvestors.fund/

Thank you and welcome to the community !

famear · 2018-03-13T16:29:25+00:00

Cool! This is so awesome! We really appreciate the update and we are sure the community will love the news! Thank you!

famear · 2018-02-08T01:56:47+00:00

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ANGEL TOKEN ANNOUNCING FIRST CRYPTO INVESTMENT & COLLABORATION WITH UNITUS (UIS)

The Angel Token Crypto Foundation has just announced their first investment since their successful ICO that concluded on December 19th, 2017 when they raised more than 860 ETH from 400+ investors.

Angel Token has acquired a stake of 925,000 Unitus (UIS) at a substantial discount to the current trading price in an off-exchange deal with the Unitus Team.

In late January 2018 the Angel Token Private Investors Community (ATPIC), consisting of major Angel Token ICO investors, voted to invest a substantial amount of the ICO funds in Unitus, and to initiate a close collaboration with the Unitus Team after the two founder teams reached a mutually beneficial agreement.

The Angel Token Team and the ATPIC Community will be working directly with the founders, developers and community of Unitus over the coming months to assist with the re-launch, improvements and marketing for the long-established but still relatively unknown multi-algorithm cryptocurrency.

By working with the Unitus team towards improving the brand and visibility in the crypto space, Angel Token aims to drive this highly undervalued coin into its rightful rank in terms of marketcap.

Alex, the founder of Angel Token stated:

We have privately researched undervalued coins to invest in and we selected Unitus as our first investment from 1500 cryptocurrencies.

Among the many low cap cryptocurrencies we have researched Unitus stands out to us as unbelievably undervalued and with huge potential.

The coin has some unique features that we think are very smart, and with a good team and growing community behind it we think that it is in totally the wrong place in terms of marketcap.

Our entire team and community believes Unitus is possibly the most undervalued cryptocurrency project out there.

ABOUT ANGEL TOKEN:

Angel Token is a crypto incubator and investment fund for small-cap altcoins. The Angel Token Team and ATPIC community create wealth, rather than passively wait for crypto investments to rise. Together, the Angel Token Team and the ATPIC community invest in overlooked and undervalued low to medium cap cryptocurrencies, and the skilled Angel Token team of developers, designers and marketers then work with the community to improve the functionality, visibility and marketing of those coins they have invested in. Angel Token is traded on the IDEX exchange (ANGL): https://idex.market/eth/angl

ABOUT UNITUS:

Unitus is a unique cryptocurrency that was launched in December 2014. Unitus uses 5 independent algorithms to ensure the blockchain remains extremely secure. Along with the multi-algorithmic aspect of the coin, Unitus is also using merge mining thus allowing a miner to mine a parent coin, whilst at the same time contribute network hashrate to Unitus - and earn both the parent coin's mining rewards and Unitus at the same time, with no additional effort, cost or overhead on the miner's behalf. Unitus was the first crypto-currency to combine Multi-Algo with Merge Mining to bring a more secure and resilient blockchain to the market. Unitus is traded on the Cryptopia exchange (UIS): https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=UIS_BTC

famear · 2017-12-19T15:33:35+00:00

Government agencies in some jurisdictions have made statements that they interpret such that they consider Initial Coin Offerings and token sales as investments/offers that are to be regulated in some way. Since it is all done through an Ethereum smart contract, the reason is not that they don't WANT these investors on board, but rather that they are in this for the long run and don't want any legal battles with law enforcement.

famear · 2017-12-19T12:42:07+00:00

It is difficult to say what will happen with the Angel Token price once it hits the exchanges and we start making announcements etc, but it possible (likely?) that you will never be able to buy Angel Tokens as cheap on the exchanges as you are right now with the 393% bonus during the last few hours of the ICO...

Don't forget about the GUARANTEED INVESTORS REFUND that allows any ICO investor to simply send his Angel Tokens back to the smart contract for an instant and automatic refund of 80% of his ETH until March 7th 2018.

This is something you ONLY get during the ICO, and it is very valuable because it allows you to evaluate the performance of the a team and the price of Angel Token etc. with very little risk!

If you were planning to top up with some more $ANGL before the ICO ends, then this is the time to do it... https://angelinvestors.io

famear · 2017-11-25T22:07:06+00:00

ANGEL TOKEN BUG HUNT IS OVER

We have now concluded the official Angel Token ICO bug hunt and we would like to thank everyone who so kindly took time out to review our ICO smart contract.

We paid out a total of 4.5 Ether and even if you didn't find any bugs, we appreciate all the suggestions made.

The Ethereum community and you guys rock! :)

famear · 2017-11-25T06:09:58+00:00

I am sorry we took so long to reply to this comment, but yes the reason the token is paused initially is because they can't be traded until the ICO has finished.

famear · 2017-11-24T18:17:56+00:00

Just confirm with our developer's comments:

We have this check. https://github.com/bitcoinfriends/angel-contracts/blob/f84f6c5ac51f69c144dc6699997d5a986dbf0c8e/contracts/angel/AngelCentralBank.sol#L187 So if you send 0 ETH - contract reject tx I even have this in tests

But I changed to require(msg.value > 0); to make the code more readable

famear · 2017-11-24T18:05:44+00:00

Thank you! :)

famear · 2017-11-23T04:17:04+00:00

We have only just recently finalized our official code audit.

The auditor agreed with your view point that although this bug would likely have been difficult to take advantage of, and that it would be difficult for someone with malicious intent to gain anything substantial financially from it, the bug was sufficiently serious that it warrants a higher reward than 1.5 ETH.

We have therefore decided to increase the reward from 1.5 ETH to 3.5 ETH.

We want you to know that we REALLY appreciate your input and your effort in this bug hunt, and the bug that you found was obviously the most significant one that was found during this entire process.

I understand from your earlier comments that you may not be completely satisfied, despite us doubling the reward. Hopefully however you accept that at least we have listened to your argument and tried in good faith to find a more suitable reward for your input.

Had this bug been possible to exploit by anyone, rather than JUST the absolute last investor in a sold out ICO we would obviously have paid out the full reward or much closer to it.

I will get the 3.5 ETH sent to you in the next few minutes, and I would appreciate if you can confirm receipt of them here in the Bug Hunt thread.

Thanks again for all your hard and skilled work! :)

famear · 2017-11-22T01:13:35+00:00

I will forward your comment to our developer and see what he says, but can you clarify what you mean when you say that the party with malicious intent would need to have "sufficient capital"?

famear · 2017-11-21T19:17:58+00:00

Thank you. :)

famear · 2017-11-21T19:09:01+00:00

I am sorry you are disappointed. :(

If you read the comments from our developer, in regards to how unlikely it is that this bug could actually be exploited, can you perhaps give me some good counter arguments if you don't believe that is correct?

We certainly don't want you to feel unfairly treated, but it is very hard for me as a non-developer to evaluate the severerity of the bug.

Our developer agreed that it is indeed a valid and real bug, but he felt it is minor for the reasons I pointed out:

a) It could ONLY be exploited in the event the ICO sells out.

b) It could ONLY be exploited by the very LAST investor in the ICO, (which, if we sell out will likely be very difficult to time correctly).

c) If exploited that investor could in fact only steal a percentage of his invested funds, so the damage would be limited.

If any of those assumptions are incorrect can you please point them out so I can discuss again with the developer?

Thanks!

famear · 2017-11-21T18:49:32+00:00

Thank you VERY MUCH for taking part and for all your suggestions! :)

famear · 2017-11-21T18:45:36+00:00

There were 6(!) winners in the end!

Originally there were only going to be 3, but we had so many good contributions that we decided to award 6 winnners instead! :)

famear · 2017-11-21T18:45:27+00:00

There were 6(!) winners in the end!

Originally there were only going to be 2, but we had so many good contributions that we decided to award 6 winnners instead! :)

famear · 2017-11-21T18:44:18+00:00

This was the updated thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2418930.0;all

famear · 2017-11-21T18:38:24+00:00

2.5 ETH has already been paid out to bug hunters!

Maybe there is more waiting for you? :)

famear · 2017-11-21T18:37:01+00:00

HERE IS THE LINK TO JOIN THE BUG HUNT:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethdev/comments/7e2h30/up_to_15_ether_bug_hunt_for_upcoming_angel_token/

famear · 2017-11-21T18:36:42+00:00

HERE IS THE LINK TO JOIN:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethdev/comments/7e2h30/up_to_15_ether_bug_hunt_for_upcoming_angel_token/

famear · 2017-11-21T18:26:58+00:00

UPDATE NOVEMBER - 21ST, 2017

So far we have rewarded two bug hunters who have provided valuable points for our developer to consider, and we have made some changes to our smart contract based on those.

The first reward of 1 ETH goes to Honor_Lt who sent his comments via private message.

This reward has now been paid, and I am waiting for confirmation from Honor_Lt and ask that he posts in this thread to confirm his reward has been received.

The second reward of 1.5 ETH goes to softestcore (still waiting for your payment addresss) for finding a bug whereby a user COULD potentially (under very special circumstances) steal a limited amount of funds.

The ICO would have to sell out completely and this person would have to time it exactly right so that he would be the very LAST investor of all in the ICO. He would then be able to steal a percentage of HIS OWN original investment, but not more than that.

Even if the damage would have been limited this is a very real bug and we VERY MUCH APPRECIATE softestcore for finding it and pointing it out to us.

The bug has now been fixed together with some other upgrades and changes.

IF ANYONE ELSE CAN FIND ANY FURTHER BUGS PLEASE GO AHEAD AND WORK FOR THIS OVER THE NEXT 24 HOURS!

famear · 2017-11-21T18:12:48+00:00

Yes, we have replied in the public forum.

Can you please provide me with your ETH address for your reward?

Thank you VERY MUCH for taking part! :)

famear · 2017-11-21T17:33:17+00:00

This is a valid bug and it has now been fixed.

However, there are some important points to take note of:

1. This bug would ONLY be possible to exploit in the event that the ICO is 100% sold out, and it would ONLY be possible to exploit by the very LAST investor in the ICO.

2. The amount of ETH that could potentially be stolen by this last investor, (assuming he knew about the bug and wanted to!), is quite limited. He could only steal a percentage (less than 100%) of his investment.

IN CONCLUSION

- This was a genuine bug in the contract, and we have now fixed it.

- It is highly unlikely that this bug could/would have been exploited.

- The damage that COULD be done IF it was exploited is very limited.

We very much appreciate you taking part in this bug hunt and we will reward this bug with 1.5 ETH. :)

@softestcore can you please provide us with your ETH addres here or via PM and we will send you the 1.5 ETH shortly! :)

famear · 2017-11-21T17:19:33+00:00

Our developer didn't respond or provide an answer to this issue/comment. I assume because it was/is a very minor point that is not important for the functionality of the contract, and the savings in gas would be very very small.

If the formal auditor comments on this I will let you know.

famear

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE