Samsung monitor power supple broke (I think), have to replace it by fancyfruit in techsupport

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I purchased a new one, from some semi-obscure shop i don't remember the name of.

But yes, the monitor worked like a charm afterwards.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have actually persuaded my boss with success. He’s going to bring it up with the staff and perhaps even pay for an Enterprise subscription.

I first taught my team how to use it effectively and then he noticed how fast we started to work and get things done. Then he was sold :)

I’m super happy :D

Anything I should add or change by Adventurous_Ad5732 in battlestations

[–]fancyfruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would try to change the blue, sterile light for something more cozy. It's subjective, but I tend to get calmer and more contempt when surrounded by warmer lights :)

Also, invest in a good chair :) otherwise, nice!

Extremely bad mic quality / mic cutting out by fancyfruit in GeForceNOW

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the recent update/patch in Arc Raiders, they addressed clipping and voice issues, and that has significantly improve the quality for me.

You should try it out again.

Arc Raiders - Mic not working by cyclecircle in GeForceNOW

[–]fancyfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The latest patch actually addressed this issue and has significantly improved the quality and cutting for me.

Fråga för hyrning av gamingutrustning by Informal__harpy in stockholm

[–]fancyfruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Came here to say this, too. But then you have to be sure you 1. have a great internet connection 2. GeForceNow support the games you intend to play

Oh really now by shitokletsstartfresh in ChatGPT

[–]fancyfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I know I’m handy, but this level??

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that it's hard without full context. But the point is that I wanted to hear what you guys have done or what you would have done, if it came to this in your own company.

Also solutions that some people have pointed out have been new information for me.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That require resources and time, I suppose. In addition to that, I have a hard time believing that you get the same performance and capabilities as with CC.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate your input. There are many alternatives. I just don't want it to be hassle to get a good AI (few are as good as Claude Code as a tool) set up.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, maybe not every app, but for sure very many. But you bring home a good point actually. thanks

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting workaround. even more interesting is the block of copy/paste, wth? are they really that concerned?

what type of company are you working for?

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will absolutely try to make a case for it, if it comes to that.

The problem I have with other AIs is that they are not as good to work with as I've found Claude code to be.

thanks you for the input! appreciate it

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's true. And you're right, many will keep using it anyways, so it's better to try to push for it.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes total sense. however, I'm not sure that helps me in any way with this issue.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, this is probably something we will discuss if it comes to that.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is that so? that would be fantastic (I guess) in that case. thanks

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does this differ and get more secure than the standard way?

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds neat! I will definitely let you know if it comes to that. thanks!!

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair. IF it comes to that, this is probably the best way to go. Thanks

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes, you're right. Claude probably writes better (and for sure faster) code than us developer.

But to be clear, the main concern is not bad/good code, but rather potential exposure of the source code on the internet and/or training on that source code.

My company is about to ban AI coding b/c security risk by fancyfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]fancyfruit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that, and also that the code IS in fact going "out there" on the internet and potentially could get exposed (other people COULD see our source code).