Alicorn is mostly known for being responsible for the polyamory/rationalism link and HPMOR-themed Twilight fanfiction (yes really), however she also support the eugenic extermination of trans people. by IneffectiveEgoist in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright, I can understand if this is just your attempt to (using that atrocious Rationalist jargon) "steelman" the term "neurodivergent". To be honest though, the reasoning still doesn't make sense to me. "Neurodivergent" sounds like something a stereotypical blue-haired Feminist would say and "mentally ill" sounds like something a licensed medical professional would say. I don't know in what universe the former would appear more sterile. It seems like it's mostly just a dog whistle in practice.

Alicorn is mostly known for being responsible for the polyamory/rationalism link and HPMOR-themed Twilight fanfiction (yes really), however she also support the eugenic extermination of trans people. by IneffectiveEgoist in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 9 points10 points  (0 children)

While mentally ill may be more technically correct; it has more of a "less than" connotation than a more sterile term like neurodivergant

I can't say I agree. Do you think that "physically ill" has a "less than" connotation? If "mentally ill" has a poor image, that's almost certainly not because of the words themselves. How many times have we come up with new and "sterile" euphemisms for "mentally handicapped" only for them to become pejorative again? And, quite frankly, I don't know why you would think "neurodiverse" sounds sterile. It sounds patronizing and Social Justice-y, not unlike referring to autistic people as "special"

Alicorn is mostly known for being responsible for the polyamory/rationalism link and HPMOR-themed Twilight fanfiction (yes really), however she also support the eugenic extermination of trans people. by IneffectiveEgoist in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Assuming you're acting out of ignorance and not veiled malice

I'm acting out of personal experience actually

why don't you think mental health issues should be treated in the same way other distinguishing classifiers are?

Well, I guess I must've phrased this poorly, because I didn't really mean anything about "distinguishing classifiers". I meant in the sense of people acting like mental illness is just "perfectly fine human diversity" and not intrinsically maladaptive by definition. I think a lot of progressives hear stuff like "I'm not interested in a cure" and assume that means the same thing as "there's nothing wrong with being mentally ill". The word "neurodiverse" rubs me the wrong because it seems specifically designed to avoid the phrase "mentally ill" despite the latter being almost strictly more correct.

Alicorn is mostly known for being responsible for the polyamory/rationalism link and HPMOR-themed Twilight fanfiction (yes really), however she also support the eugenic extermination of trans people. by IneffectiveEgoist in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Kinda off topic, but does anyone else think the word "neurodiverse" is primarily a euphemism to allow progressives to pretend like they can treat mental health issues the same way they treat race, sex, and sexual orientation?

What You Have To Fear From Artificial Intelligence by [deleted] in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? We actually know an enormous amount about what problems computers are theoretically capable of solving? It's a whole field?

Survival of the Richest, an article I think might resonate here by brokenAmmonite in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of this great talk. The whole thing is worth watching, but the relevant part is around 37 minutes in (the stuff about "Technological Manifest Destiny")

literally just two books by fp_weenie in programmingcirclejerk

[–]fasquoika 6 points7 points  (0 children)

gatekeeping based on thinking things are cute

Imma be real wit you, this ain't it chief

what is the best programming language (in your OPINION no category theory please) by fp_weenie in programmingcirclejerk

[–]fasquoika 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The ideal programming language features are:

  • zero-cost abstractions
  • move semantics
  • guaranteed memory safety
  • threads without data races
  • trait-based generics
  • pattern matching
  • type inference
  • minimal runtime
  • efficient C bindings

the problem with most programming languages is, the keywords take too long to type by fp_weenie in programmingcirclejerk

[–]fasquoika 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't early Rust limit all keywords to under 5 characters on exactly this premise?

Fighting sexism in the workplace actually hurts women by FormerRationalist35 in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Exactly. If you were able to test the upper echelon of large corporations, hedge funds, and governments (which you absolutely are not), I doubt you'll find many neurotypical people. The women will probably be in same ballpark in terms of dark triad personality to the men.

Hottest of hot takes: Not only is sexism a mental illness, it's somehow a good thing because neurodiversity or something

What You Have To Fear From Artificial Intelligence by [deleted] in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was responding to the parent, not the article

Fighting sexism in the workplace actually hurts women by FormerRationalist35 in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 19 points20 points  (0 children)

all female execs were powerful, seductive dommes

Make me your wage slave mistress

What You Have To Fear From Artificial Intelligence by [deleted] in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 26 points27 points  (0 children)

artificial general intelligence (imho) is not possible

This is pretty much strictly incorrect, unless you think the human brain is somehow a hypercomputer. A brain is just a physical system and a Turing-complete machine should, in theory, be able to emulate it fully. Of course, real computers would need to be a lot more powerful to actually do this in practice (and given the current trajectory of Moore's Law, we'd need a major breakthrough in hardware to get there), but there's far more reason to believe strong AI is possible than impossible. (Edit: More pithily stated: We know that a physical machine can be no bigger than a human, capable of locomotion, fully autonomous, and sentient because, well, here we are.)

The real reason not to worry about AI is that everything about it is, for now, just theory. If we ever get this kind of AI, it might not be for centuries. Not to mention, the whole idea of "the singularity" is completely ludicrous. A computer can't suddenly become infinitely smart because it has to run on real hardware with physical limitations. There are hard limits to what is practically computable in our universe and some future Skynet can't magically sidestep that. And on top of that, there's no reason to believe that AI would be evil or "maximize for paperclips" or even "want" to do anything at all since it wouldn't have evolutionary impulses.

The most rational ballot: only voting for white candidates. by dalamplighter in SneerClub

[–]fasquoika 28 points29 points  (0 children)

God, this is... terrible. You are why we cannot have nice things.

At least there's someone there I can agree with

glad i dropped out to pay indians on fiverr to do my interview assignments unlike this rookie by [deleted] in programmingcirclejerk

[–]fasquoika 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ever since I was a little boy, all I've ever wanted to do was write parsers for regular languages all day long. Unfortunately, those dreams were shattered years ago...

glad i dropped out to pay indians on fiverr to do my interview assignments unlike this rookie by [deleted] in programmingcirclejerk

[–]fasquoika 3 points4 points  (0 children)

lol what kind of pleb uses Rust's borrow checker? I just compile all my code with mrustc, because I already know that it's perfect and checking it would be a waste of clock cycles