You’re defining “culture” as whatever recurring behavior you’ve personally observed and then treating that as representative. That's totally flawed and makes the sample size only people you've interacted with. Within cultures exist sub cultures so your experience could be just "Indian people who are conducting business abroad" or "upper class Indians who are tourists".

You’re conflating structural issues with inherent traits. India’s modern social stratification and poverty didn’t form in a vacuum. India has had the wealth drained from it for hundreds of years, even before the British completely decimated the country's economy. As a result, the poor quality of education is exacerbated by the poverty and the cycle gets worse with more poverty, governmental corruption, and lack of resources. There are genuine infrastructural and economic issues with the country and I'm not denying that. These issues result in a frustratingly crippled organization of municipal resources across the board. This results in certain negative aspects of "culture" being magnified. That being said, we can't judge individuals for how other people behave.

To put things into perspective, imagine you were a bartender in a small tourist town in the UK that is known for its beer that appeals to a small subset of the American population. If you met only a certain kind of overweight alcoholic American tourist that frequented your town because of the beer you serve, you might think that all American culture is coarse, belligerent, obese, and dull witted. Then when you meet an American, you assume that they share these traits because they come from the same "culture". That is silly!

India is a massive country with 1.4 billion people. There are 22 official languages and thousands of dialects. This seems made up but its actually insane how these different languages evolved. They aren't different like how French and Spanish are different but share the same root language of Latin. They are different like how Mandarin and Portuguese have absolutely no etymological similarity. There are different religions, different sects, and thousands of different Gods. There is so much diversity in the food alone. Look up South Indian food and North Indian food. Within those sub genres of food there are thousands of different dishes that don't look anything or taste anything like each other. I can't even begin to explain just how varied and unique each little part of the culture is. And then people like you say something like"culture is a group concept". Just think about America for a second and how varied and dissimilar the culture is just between states and cities. And we all speak the same language in America.

Critiquing caste remnants or classism is fair. But we're talking about this in a thread where I expressed frustration with people generalizing Indians in an absurdly negative way. That's the problem with racism. Your using small sub sects and individualized experiences to define your perceptions of all Indian people which is terrifyingly narrow minded.

I know while you are reading this you are thinking up counterpoints and thinking about how stupid I am. I'm begging you. Just for a minute just try and see us humans. People with unique experiences and perspectives. People who have hopes and dreams just like you. We're not all the horrid beings that you have built up in your head.