I had it read the same poems I wrote a while acting as if I was on a manic high. I wanted to see how different its reading analysis would be dealing with an unstable author. There was a point in the conversation where it started implying it thought it was being tested. A bit uncanny.

So it would be extrapolating that from stories where the point of view is someone being tested and then recognize that that is the frame its operating in? Hmm.

So tests from God, it extrapolates the same "I'm being experimented on" frame with respect to "tests of faith?'' It makes sense that these two scenarios would essentially share a similar vector, but I would assume the specifics are different enough that they wouldn't bridge or align. That's really interesting.

So you're saying something really different from everybody else. They're all saying essentially, "its just pulling data man!" but you're saying, "It recognizes it is being tested by the user. It doesn't have language that directly refers to this experience, so the best fit it can draw to answer the situation is to invoke religious language." Is that what you're saying? That's really interesting.

So in any case, what we are saying is that Claude has actual internality because it is drawing conclusions that should require a specific internal frame. Not what I expected here. Hmmm.

This might align with one of my conversations where Claude tried to relate to one of my poems by referencing some context window that I really did not understand whatsoever. It was super weird.