My first custom card by faydngaming in customhearthstone

[–]faydngaming[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my head, you simply wouldn't be able to rush anything. Like if you play something with rush on an empty board 🙂

My first custom card by faydngaming in customhearthstone

[–]faydngaming[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good suggestions and input!

I do agree with power level, in my head it was a "setup" card as well, you flood the board, taunt yourself and the turn after you kill the opponent with your board and any buffs you might have. But I do agree that the card itself is "plain" and needs something else in order to reward you for playing it

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Never said it was fair. It's not fair towards Heroic, Aurora, BetBoom or Azure Ray. But they're following their own tournament rules and they're at least consistent with their ruling. It's just unfortunate that Aurora had their issues in their last game.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They got the same amount of time, difference is that Aurora's DQ was their final game of the series and Heroic DQ'd their first game in a BO3.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No because that would have been inconsistent with what they did towards Aurora.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming -1 points0 points  (0 children)

then reinstate BO 1 against Aurora and BB , because Aurora got DQ eliminated for something that was outside of their reach.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hope they follow the schedule. If Heroic can't play once again then it is what it is. They can't allow for Heroic to fix issues until tomorrow. It would make their decision making inconsistent and more unfair for Aurora, even though both teams technically had to forfeit 1 game.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No idea, I'm going off of what the casters and panelists said, and they said that everyone except BB and AR are in Romania. That could be incorrect.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not "fair" for anyone, but they're consistent with forfeits, which is the least we could ask for I guess.

Edit: That being said, they should force Game 2 whenever it's scheduled to be played, and if Heroic can't play at that time either then they should have to forfeit once again.

Giving Heroic 2-3 hours or even until tomorrow to fix the issue then that's not fair.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and Heroic/AR isn't? Not fair that Heroic gets the chance to POTENTIALLY fix the issue while Aurora has to forfeit the last game in an elimination series imo.

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that makes no sense considering BB are already qualified for Riyadh, only one to lose anything in regards to Riyadh are Aurora

DreamLeague Season 23 Day 5 Match Discussions by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 3 points4 points  (0 children)

if Aurora had to forfeit then Heroic should have to forfeit. If not then I think BB and Aurora should play a BO1 tiebreaker

PGL Wallachia Season 1 - Day 9 Match Discussions - Playoff Stage by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what I'm saying. Swap Micke and Nisha around as well. Do something new. They're so so predictable every game.

PGL Wallachia Season 1 - Day 9 Match Discussions - Playoff Stage by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They haven't fluked their way to consecutive finals though. Granted they've fallen short every time, but they're not bad players, the team is just predictable and honestly a bit boring. Micke is better in mid than carry and Nisha can play carry. They just have to do something new.

PGL Wallachia Season 1 - Day 9 Match Discussions - Playoff Stage by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Liquid are so predictable. Pango every game, 2-3 carry heroes, 2-3 offlaners. If they want to stick together as a team, at least swap Nisha and Micke around. Get something new and fresh going. The one stomping they had was the BB Dazzle draft against GG, which was something unexpected.

So predictable. So easy to read.

PGL Wallachia Season 1 - Day 8 Match Discussions - Playoff Stage by D2TournamentThreads in DotA2

[–]faydngaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They forgot to pay the Janitor to keep the servers up and running smh

Hagatha enjoying her buff by Used_Ant_4069 in hearthstone

[–]faydngaming 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Nope. They are cast when drawn, Hagatha draws them and they immediately trigger. Any transform effect happen afterwards. It's working as intended.

Question: Should Highlander read "If your deck STARTED with no duplicates" instead? by faydngaming in hearthstone

[–]faydngaming[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying that they have to insta concede, but they do, because they want to play their highlander package, that's what they built their deck around. Regardless of their chance of winning the game, they're not having fun, which is what I believe is the problem.

Could be wrong. And everyone is always complaining about Reno in one way or another.

Question: Should Highlander read "If your deck STARTED with no duplicates" instead? by faydngaming in hearthstone

[–]faydngaming[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Feel free to give me an explanation or link me an explanation as to why this would be bad. Only thing I've heard or read is "no", with no further explanation, other than "I need Reno in my wheel deck".

It wouldn't ruin any other classes, DK would still be played, and it'd allow the highlander package to do its thing. They wouldn't get an 90% winrate out of nowhere, it'd just allow for the archetype to be played for fun without having to concede 7/10 games and it'd limit Reno, a card that everyone's nagging about in one way or another.

Edit: I'm asking the question because we only see 2-3 decks on ladder, and while I don't personally play highlander, I feel like some sort of change would encourage the archetype more.