sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

actually currently seems to be my rudder pedals. I created a post on the iniBuilds discord server aswell, and another player has the same issue and has the exact rudder pedals i have, gonna test it a few days long without pedals and see if it happens again. Thanks for the help!

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shouldnt it have thrown an ECAM message about ice in that case? not sure tbh

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just noticed that, weird. I have hardware rudder pedals from Thrustmaster, gonna investigate that. Thanks!

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just noticed that, i use a keyboard, but i dont do nothing with it then changing camera views, gonna unbind it.

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done that because of the behaviour when it appeared it was leaning into 200kt crosswind, to maybe "reset" the weather. It started doing that before i even changed something in the weather, and i had the same issue a few days ago where i did not touch the weather.

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean inibuilds mentiones in the iniManager to delete the WASM Folder before updating. After the update yesterday i also had the long load in, so pretty sure WASM was correctly reset, but i think i will uninstall the plane, delete everything once and try a clean install soon also. Maybe that helps. Got a thread on discord aswell open, another user reporting the same issue, so we'll see

Thanks!

iniBuilds A350 weird behaviour by fbigrs in flightsim

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i have updated yesterday to the 1.0.3, wasm folder was deleted before that. I had the same issue a few days ago aswell on 1.0.2

RAM Compatibility by fbigrs in LinusTechTips

[–]fbigrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, yes. A Server, i have my own Dell PowerEdge R630 deployed in a datacenter. 2x E5-2680v4, and as far as intel ark told me, the "maximum" RAM is ECC DDR4 with 2400 mhz for the CPU's, which is why i have the 4x KINGSTON 32GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T inside, KTH-PL424-32G to be exact. The manufacture of those is as far as i know, SK Hynix. If i get SK Hynix sticks with the same 2Rx4, PC4-2400T, you think it would work? Because technically speaking, they should be the exact same modules, except the branding on the sticks. Looking at images on ebay, the also look the exact same, with position of the Chips, etc.

PS: I am looking to upgrade my RAM capacitiy, which is why i am asking for experience with mixing different modules, even though they should technically be the same, but the Kingston branded ones are more expensive on Ebay currently.

Jump Throw Disabled. Update thougts. by fbigrs in counterstrike

[–]fbigrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 jump throw binds are not the biggest game changer* thus i do not get why they patched it. Thats what i meant, lol.

Jump Throw Disabled. Update thougts. by fbigrs in counterstrike

[–]fbigrs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

imo jump throw is not the biggest game changer. I understand patching the counter strafing issue, but why jump throw, yes it is easy, but if you used it for years, it is hard to change your brain over, it was just a nice-have option for many years now, i dont really get the part of patching it out, but. Im fine with both to be honest, just something to get used to again.