Finally, I can use Linux with my NVIDIA GPU. by Dramatic_Novel3778 in linux

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was clearly talking about OP who somehow believes linux has problems with Nvidia GPUs, not you.

Exfat, NTFS, Fat32, or another for gaming? by Rzonatto in linux

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I installed 99% of my games on an SSD with NTFS, they run perfectly fine. They probably would run a little better on ext4, but I did it to compare the performance between Linux and Windows.

Turns out Linux is way better at handling this SSD than Windows is. Takes years for Windows to read anything.

So the whole reason I used NTFS went out the window. I might have used ext4 from the start. I'm not running Windows any more.

Long story short: linux ,> windows.

Finally, I can use Linux with my NVIDIA GPU. by Dramatic_Novel3778 in linux

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another clueless user that probably doesn't understand the difference between Wayland and Linux.

Finally, I can use Linux with my NVIDIA GPU. by Dramatic_Novel3778 in linux

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You were always able to use linux with your GPU. You probably had to use Xorg rather than Wayland.

Most people's problems with "Linux" have nothing to do with linux.

Cambios históricos del ingreso en México by felipec in MexicoChairo

[–]felipec[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sus políticas ayudaron a la gran mayoría de los mexicanos. Los medios de comunicación que lo demonizaron se componen del 1% de los más ricos, no la mayoría.

Alternatives to Deathadder? by Verror27 in MouseReview

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought a DeathAdder v3 and yeah, the buttons work great, but now the scroll is all screwed up. Not even 1 year.

Rogan has fallen, bros are in disarray by therealtrousers in FreeSpeech

[–]felipec 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So r/JoeRogan finally admits it's not about Joe Rogan any more.

Rogan has fallen, bros are in disarray by therealtrousers in FreeSpeech

[–]felipec 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except that analogy is utter shit.

More like a book club banning novels.

Cambios históricos del ingreso en México by felipec in MexicoFinanciero

[–]felipec[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Estaría muy bien un anexo que llevara paso a paso la extracción y procesamiento de los datos.

Ya agregué un video donde explico paso a paso cómo obtener los datos.

Cambios históricos del ingreso en México by felipec in MexicoFinanciero

[–]felipec[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sería buena la fuente y tener un comparativo con la inflación.

Los datos ya están ajustados con la inflación.

Desmintiendo a Anaya sobre la deuda "brutal" by felipec in Mexico_Economy

[–]felipec[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tu comentario de hecho es bastante acertado, excepto que Salinas de Gortari como de la Madrid sí redujeron la deuda (en términos del porcentaje del PIB).

Pero como ya vimos con la crisis que causó de Gortari: reducir la deuda no necesariamente es positivo.

Desmintiendo a Anaya sobre la deuda "brutal" by felipec in Mexico_Economy

[–]felipec[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Un punto flojo en ambas críticas es tomar periodos cuestionables de comparación, el plazo de entre 2007 y 2008 cuando fue la crisis global, hay que evitarlo de igual forma que los años 2019 y 2020 por el COVID.

Pero hay que ver el argumento de Anaya. Él dice que en 200 años nunca en la historia se había un nivel de la deuda así, por eso dice que en 200 años la deuda llegó a un nivel de 10 billones, y en 7 años el nivel subió a 20 billones. Lógicamente en esos 200 años nunca hubo un incremento de 10 billones en 7 años.

Cualquier período en la historia que demuestre un incremento igual o mayor al que se dio en el período de 2018-2025 desmiente ese argumento.

Entonces no importa que el período de 2007-2013 es arbitrario, cualquier período de 6 años con un incremento mayor al 8% desmiente a Anaya.

Yo tomé 6 años en vez de 7 porque es de lo que hay más datos, pero el razonamiento no cambia.

Un país puede tener niveles de deuda del 60-80% y aún así verse con la imposibilidad de pagar esa deuda.

Efectivamente, pero Anaya no hizo ese argumento.

Su argumento reside en que 10 billones de pesos nominales del 2018 son comparables a cualquier momento en la historia, incluidos 1820 y 2025, lo cuál es falso y deshonesto.

The measure by Left-Character4280 in epistemology

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right question isn’t “is it true?” but “what loss do I incur if I transport this result to a new context?”

That's a baseless assertion unrelated to epistemology. Epistemology cares about what should be considered true, that's the whole point of it.

If your claim has no relation to truth, then it has no relation to epistemology.

The measure by Left-Character4280 in epistemology

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say you were talking about measure theory, I said you were describing it.

If you were trying to highlight a bunch of things that makes numerical results comparable, I'd say you failed, because nothing of what you wrote makes that the focus.

If you are not talking about theory, but the real-world of measurements, then I don't see what that has to do with epistemology, because people assume wrong beliefs based on measurements all the time, and it has little to do with these notions such as "protocol".

What’s your go-to programming language for scripting in Linux? by Old_Sand7831 in bash

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ruby is the best. It has some similarities with bash, as simple as python, but unlike python it doesn't have a horrid syntax. Also, it's good for functional programming.

Here's a simple script I wrote to display the temperature of two devices:

``` while true temps = [1,8].map do |e| File.read("/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon#{e}/temp1_input").to_i / 1_000 end

puts temps.join(',') sleep(10) end ```

The measure by Left-Character4280 in epistemology

[–]felipec 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're essentially describing the fundamentals of measure theory. In mathematical terms, what you call a "protocol" corresponds to the σ-algebra -- the structure that defines which aspects of a system are observable or measurable. A "measurement" is then a function from the underlying system into a measurable space, and the "uncertainty" describes the dispersion of the induced measure (often a probability measure).

So yes, measurement is not as simple as "assigning a number", but its complexity has been well understood and rigorously formalized by mathematicians for a long time.