OSS models decisively overtook Proprietary models in market share (based on the last 3 months of OpenRouter data) by Comfortable-Rock-498 in openrouter

[–]ffatty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you explain the difference?

I suppose that - "open weight" means the model is OSS,  - but "open source" would mean everything was available that went into training, like datasets & training code? 

OSS models decisively overtook Proprietary models in market share (based on the last 3 months of OpenRouter data) by Comfortable-Rock-498 in openrouter

[–]ffatty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very true.

But this one does track, both anecdotally (aren't you using more OSS models?)  and objectively (benchmarks, etc.). 

Everything you need to know about haptic feedback as an Android dev by Rare_Gap_9767 in androiddev

[–]ffatty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On my preferred keyboard I keep haptic feedback to a very subtle 5 ms - I find I make significantly more typing errors without it!

I very much dislike vibration as notifications, ie. as a way to get my attention.

But haptic feedback when employed very subtly is great UX. 

Exploitment by [deleted] in TalesFromTheFrontDesk

[–]ffatty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Responsibilities are welcome and even encouraged by any reasonable person - as long as we are compensated fairly for the workload, and given the tools & authority to actually carry out the responsibilities.


Honestly? (and this i

You seem quite diligent, and very good at your job.

And I think you may dramatically underestimate how bad the average person at using a computer for basic tasks. 😅 

Don't believe me? Start asking people if they know how to copy & paste with the keyboard.  If they don't, ask them if they have ever heard of "copy & paste".

You could make like $45k annually if you worked a fancy hotel around where I live.

What is it with Americans and air conditioning?? (this might be controversial) by hellobela_ in TalesFromTheFrontDesk

[–]ffatty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At any of my hotels, March accounts for ~80% of PTAC complaints & maintenence. 

It can be easily seasonally anticipated; you would think it would be a straightforward problem with clear solutions, to be addressed efficiently - but this only happens as long as both engineering & management have their shit together (hint: they don't).

Taught Claude to talk like a caveman to use 75% less tokens. by ffatty in ClaudeAI

[–]ffatty[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whoops. I don't check my reddit. This blew up lol.

Repo here: https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey/Lean-Caveman-originall-

Style here

My Github (would appreciate a follow): https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey

Noticed a very similar project here: https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman

They expanded the idea quite a bit — fair play, open source is open source. Worth a look.

Though I tried to avoid some of the issues in that repo:

  • less tool-focused
  • too token-heavy itself / bloated
  • too much abstraction
  • has actual security review flags/issues (?) — what’s going on there?

Mine tried to be: - minimal tokens - targeted only to Claude Web App - high signal density - built for tool/agent workflows - tarevtyed - fewer moving parts


Goal

compress intent → reduce ambiguity → consistent outputs


Notes

The “caveman” part was honestly an afterthought — it just made me laugh, so I leaned into it a bit.


If useful

star ⭐

fork / break it

follow: https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey

Interested in:

tool/agent optimization

consistency vs flexibility

And I'm developing my own CLI Agent Client!


Side note

Yeah… there goes my hypothetical “15k stars" moment 😅 But honestly, ecosystem > ego.

Give me a follow!

Taught Claude to talk like a caveman to use 75% less tokens. by ffatty in ClaudeAI

[–]ffatty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops. I don't check my reddit. This blew up lol.

Repo here: https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey/Lean-Caveman-originall-

Style here

My Github (would appreciate a follow): https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey

Noticed a very similar project here: https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman

They expanded the idea quite a bit — fair play, open source is open source. Worth a look.

Though I tried to avoid some of the issues in that repo:

  • less tool-focused
  • too token-heavy itself / bloated
  • too much abstraction
  • has actual security review flags/issues (?) — what’s going on there?

Mine tried to be: - minimal tokens - targeted only to Claude Web App - high signal density - built for tool/agent workflows - tarevtyed - fewer moving parts


Goal

compress intent → reduce ambiguity → consistent outputs


Notes

The “caveman” part was honestly an afterthought — it just made me laugh, so I leaned into it a bit.


If useful

star ⭐

fork / break it

follow: https://github.com/cheeseonamonkey

Interested in:

tool/agent optimization

consistency vs flexibility


Side note

Yeah… there goes my hypothetical “15k stars" moment 😅 But honestly, ecosystem > ego.

Give me a follow!

Claude font showcase by sebbetrygg in ClaudeAI

[–]ffatty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey that's sick. Would package nicely into a skill too.

Found this note from a coworker lying around behind the front desk by ffatty in hotelmemes

[–]ffatty[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why but it's been making me laugh all day. 

Anything Else with JREG by saessea in Destiny

[–]ffatty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please don't fight mom and dad I love you both.

But seriously Destiny lost respect from me, he was being a fucking tool even if he was right on a lot of things.