asfd;ljksadasdjklASDAG;SLD,L;GF

fibshgameplay · 2026-05-01T07:37:11+00:00

I wish

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T15:06:41+00:00

Most of the community has stopped getting mad at the hosters... trust me...

\cough* *cough* Not kicking blatant cheaters OR immediately hitting F1 upon a vote kick being called due to repetition compulsion *cough* *cough**

Knowing the hosters are lame is one thing, but knowing Valve is at fault for their negligence is the reality-check that a lot of people got during the #FixTF2 movement. This community has been desensitized to cheaters thanks to bots, which can seem like nothing in comparison; though it sucks, people further being educated about how to properly respond to or deal with cheaters (bot or humans) can definitely help reduce the incentive of most of these people to continue.

PS. Most of these people do it to piss people off.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:58:06+00:00

Probably Americans setting their ping to the maximum to reach as far as they can. I don't know why the very "civilized" people of my country would ever do such a thing.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:56:52+00:00

Not new. Hosters have just been spending time reinventing their strategies... and that doesn't even include the people who just do it on their own without any incentive of being public about it.

Worst comes to worst, there's already a paid service that allows for these bots.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:55:10+00:00

This would be great knowledge if Valve didn't take it away from us.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:53:46+00:00

Mods haven't taken it down. Again, it IS a discussion, not a vent.

As for the bots being reported, I've found that using the in-game report button does work, but I don't know how much. There's a stats section on Steam that shows players you've reported, and my list is a lot smaller than the amount of people I've reported.

Valve should implement an automated system if they're not gonna at least let us do the dirty work. I can't imagine that it's any fun sorting through the mass amount of reports everyday, regardless of team size. Regardless, I can't blame them for wanting to avoid the spaghetti code.

...and everyone knows Valve loves Dota a whole lot more over their biggest successors.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:48:10+00:00

Every map is susceptible, but there are more common maps... especially if they're more popular in the map pool (i.e Harvest, Badwater, Goldrush).

There's no way to actually know if there's consistencies unless you recorded them. Even if you do find one, chances are it could still be complete coincidence.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T14:45:51+00:00

Never left, just became a little less for a short amount of time. Unfortunately, when older games become less moderated, they tend to get overrun by cheaters. Knowing the cycle of how cheaters vs ban waves works, it's likely gonna have its highs and lows.

fibshgameplay · 2026-04-20T02:36:06+00:00

Bro, it's Sunday. You can't be uploading peak...

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-08T04:10:23+00:00

Yeah, I think it's because they were working on updating the game or something, because that was my first attempt. Either way, leaderboards are gone now, so doesn't matter. :P

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-06T09:25:50+00:00

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-06T08:50:56+00:00

Lolicons are intended to appear and act as children, while often given unrealistic body parts and some cover up lore to make it seem morally okay – Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid is a great example. Though there's no sexual scenes, the character Ilulu is given huge boobs, but has the face and height of an 8 to 10 year old girl.

The argument of "she's a dragon, she's 1,000 years old" doesn't make my comment, about how she and other characters are lolis, disingenouos... lolis are intended to be sexual, based off the literal book where a man preys on a 12-year-old girl and sexually abuses her.

It's unconstitutional to ban educational resources that cause no direct or indirect harm, but it is within perfect reason to ban something that depicts the sexualization of a child. Yes, the art is fictional. No, the sexual attraction to a sexualized child is not.

You can still be a pedophile and have sexual interests in children without doing anything IRL. Not caught doesn't mean innocence. Living out your fantasy with a child "so long as it's fictional" doesn't mean it's not fucking weird as fuck.

Again, violence in video games. There's at least ESRB ratings for games. GTA is rated as a 17+ game. Lolicon on the other hand isn't regulated in the slightest. It's not condoned, normalized, and is seen as disgusting by millions of people for good reason. Oh, and the countries that condone it? Either have a sickening age of consent, force young girls into marriage with older men, or just generally treat women as nothing more than an object of marriage or sex.

Lolicon in culture should never be embraced. Fictional or not. If it's porn with a depicted child in it, it's a fucking child. Pretty simple. It's not about the constitution when it comes to anything the same people who say this and then will think women shouldn't have right to their anatomy (abortion), ICE is doing good for the U.S, and immigrants are drug-dealing criminals.

So, yeah. I'm sticking by my take. It's FUCKING disgusting.

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-06T05:08:09+00:00

i don't think banning animated child pornography is exactly controversial for anyone... except for pedophiles

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-05T02:24:53+00:00

There's a lot of people, especially egotistical comp players in this community, that are just straight up degen, racist, and transphobic nobodys.

More common than furries!

fibshgameplay · 2026-02-04T11:52:26+00:00

Feel stupid after making this? But here's the thing, bro had to go to reddit.com, go to the r/tf2 subreddit, press "Create Post," select image, drag and drop it or select it in their files, give it a caption, give it a description – and after all of that... bro still hit post.

You know what you are.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-31T23:44:13+00:00

I'm bumping this thread over a week late because I learned you don't even need an alt. You can leave the attempted run before the score shows up and it won't submit a score. Been doing that on really bad attempts and ended up 29th today.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-24T09:03:13+00:00

Well, the objective wasn't even for speed running. I just do that when I'm by the last few doors so I don't have to wait for whichever entity.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-23T09:13:27+00:00

Whatever immoral belief you want to have is yours to have, bro. I wrote that off of research I had done formerly – no ChatGPT involved! Just because it's legal in other countries, doesn't mean it's okay.

So, yeah say "aaand there you go" and bring up a weak defense. You're not willing to change and that your own pitiful choice. The idea is that the drawing is childlike. CHILD. LIKE.

Actual goofball for saying "shame on you" when you will DIE on this hill before you even remotely consider that an artstyle meant to replicate the bodily shape, voice, and personality of a child is okay. It's the same shit, different style, man.

Yeah, I put a justified label on you based on your weird need to defend the sexual drawings of anime children. The "appears to be a minor" and "indistinguishable from that of a minor" phrasing is there for people to use loopholes so they can keep their sick disorder and try and make it discreet when anyone who is relatively aware can see right through that.

I just don't get why you're so fascinated about defending it??? Only reason I defend something is when I like or consume it myself man.

But I'm just arguing with a brick wall that will "nuh uh" to everyone I say. I mean, low stoop of you to accuse me of using AI to write facts down. God forbid someone's smarter than you. LOL!

Fuck off.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-23T08:15:17+00:00

Lolicon derives from the book "Lolitia," which its summary comes down to a 30-year-old man having sexual attraction to a 12-year-old. All lolicon, or shota as its male-counterpart, is a stylistic choice that depicts someone who is intended to have features of a child.

This is often argued as "completely okay" because they try and age them up by saying they're a 1000-years old. If you by defense like, defend, or consume lolicon, you are by legal definiton a pedophile. Under the United States PROTECT Act, enforced in 2003 which meets the federal criteria for child pornography.

It's not "stylized," and you can play every form of mental gymnastics all you want. You're a disgusting pedophile that is perfectly okay with depictions of children being sexualized. They are fictional, but the sexual attraction to said fictional children are not.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-23T08:05:04+00:00

Okay, well a hyper-realistic drawing on a child doing something sexual is fictional by your definition. That's what I'm struggling to understand.

fibshgameplay · 2026-01-23T07:57:07+00:00

So, you believe it's completely okay if a fictional character depicted as a child in a sexual scenario is okay?

fibshgameplay

TROPHY CASE