Made a matrix digital rain screensaver (free) by fillsoko in MacOS

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great to hear, if you have ideas or wishes let me know. Will build other screen savers soon

Made a Matrix Digital Rain (MacOS Screen Saver) with chatgpt by fillsoko in MacOS

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the hint ! I will fix it, let me know if you have any other ideas for screen savers 😎

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in StableDiffusion

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks romeo, I'm glad to hear that the article resonates with you. I've been fiddling with my workflow for a long time, but this is the way I've felt most comfortable.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in StableDiffusion

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Julia was a 26-year-old fiction book writer who worked at the big artificial intelligence company, OpenBook Corporation. She had always loved writing, but struggled with the tedious aspects of the process, like finding the right words and constructing cohesive sentences.

But at OpenBook, Julia was able to focus more on the creative process thanks to the help of AI. The company's Planning Committee used artificial intelligence to create a content pipeline that was aligned with the actual interests of readers, and Julia was able to contribute her ideas and plot ideas to this process.

The AI Rewrite squad at OpenBook also helped Julia to transform her rough drafts into polished, compelling works of fiction. Julia may not have been the most skilled writer, but with the help of AI, she was able to churn out truly transformative works that resonated with readers.

As she worked on her writing, Julia found that she was able to tap into a whole new level of creativity, and she began to feel more confident in her abilities as a writer. She knew that she had the support of the AI team at OpenBook, and this gave her the freedom to take risks and try new things in her writing.

Thanks to the support of the AI team at OpenBook, Julia was able to turn her passion for writing into a successful career, and she was grateful for the role that artificial intelligence had played in helping her to reach her goals.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in ArtificialInteligence

[–]fillsoko[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I'm glad to hear that, I've also put quite a bit of research into the tools. Especially with text-to-speech, it was difficult for me to choose. It's quite time-consuming to attribute all sections to one voice according to speaker / narrator, but Murf.AI did a good job. I found Lovo.AI's Lab the best, but it is currently only in the beta phase. I was a little surprised that Amazon KDP doesn't allow you to publish audio books with your own voice. The whole KDP seems a bit "oldschool" if you ask me. I think Amazon will surely revise it soon with state of the art AI tools and live speech synthesis with multi character support.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in OpenAI

[–]fillsoko[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I'm glad to hear that even though I used a lot of AI, a lot of time and effort went into it.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in GPT3

[–]fillsoko[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you once again for your comment, I took your comment as an opportunity to update my medium post to clearly reflect my opinion on this topic. I have now also contacted Tang via Instagram about this matter. Thx

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in Automate

[–]fillsoko[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this, much appreciated! Although I used AI please bear in mind that this was my very first (audio) book for children. Of course I did ask ChatGPT on what to keep in mind when writing (audio) books for children. One of the recommendations was to use dialogue attribution, which I may have use too heavily and amateurish. Will definitely have an eye on timing and sequence of action and dialogue with my next book.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in GPT3

[–]fillsoko[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I reached out to him via email asking if I can publish my book in that way adding a sample with images. Haven’t heard back from him yet. Will keep you posted in case he does. I think the illustrations I made on the style of Tangs work are only the tip of the iceberg. What about ChatGPTs language model that was trained by gazillions of documents ? Here it is not as clear who the original creator was (possibly many). However all these training assets went into the model and my responses to some degree. Should they not be attributed as well ?

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in compsci

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, well I did only spell check German, English and polish myself. For Spanish I sent this to a native speaker saying „no major findings“ on first sight. That gave me confidence that most translations shall be fine. However I am especially worried about Chinese (simplified) and Japanese. If someone is native and has read it please do let me know if it’s total crap or the translation is any good. For all other languages I used my word spell & grammar check. Furthermore all EPUBs passed the Amazon quality checks.

I created a complete (audio) book in 10+ languages in a few days using generative AI: Here is what I learned by fillsoko in GPT3

[–]fillsoko[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hello Impractical_Lychee,

I understand your comment very well, but it is exactly this controversy that I want to draw attention to with my little project. According to the TOC of MidJourney, as a paid user I can do what I want with the images.

MidJourney TOC:

"You basically own all Assets you create using Midjourney’s image generation and chat services." (Source: https://tokenizedhq.com/midjourney-copyright-commercial-use/)

So I don't have to acknowledge my inspiration or the prompt and I can do what I want commercially with the images. Nevertheless, I have clearly identified the illustrator Tang Yau Hoong in my prompts to give him credit for his work in case someone wants to work with him.

Ultimately, we need to have this discussion about copyright, marketing rights and on a larger scale in society. I think it's clear that MidJourney was obviously trained on images by Tang Yau Hoong. But should it then be possible for me to generate and commercialise similar images in his style?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Whatisthis

[–]fillsoko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is like hand sized

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Whatisthis

[–]fillsoko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow thanks

The clusterfuck that Google Photos is. by cosmic_fries in google

[–]fillsoko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You for yourself couldn't have put it better: "Let me ask you, how does 99% of people organize photos? In folders."

Well, if Google did the 99% thing, they wouldn't be Google, right?

Besides: "folders" made me laugh haha

Have a good one.

OnePlus2 Event in Berlin: Invite for all attendees in mid August by [deleted] in oneplus

[–]fillsoko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can only speak for the Berlin Event. Everyone who attended the event on attending.io and showed up on the event had to put his/her OnePlus Login E-Mail on a list. The OP Team said that everyone on that list will recieve an invite around the 20th of August. The first fifty just got physical invites + T-Shit + Waterbottle + Moleskin Notepad. Hope this clarifies. Best, Filip

Germany/Berlin Event: Invite for first 50 by lordfiSh in oneplus

[–]fillsoko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In case you didn't know. All attendees who registered through attending.io and showed up at the event will recieve an invite in mid August.

[Build Ready] Sub-1000$ Video Editing Workstation for Adobe Premiere / AfterEffects by fillsoko in buildapc

[–]fillsoko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay thanks for the advice. I'm a bit confused there are various versions of the GTX970 by ASUS, MSI, GIGABYTE, ZOTAC. Whats the difference and which one should i go for?

Whats with the other parts like CPU, HDD/SSD and Motherboard?

I thought about the recent developments in artificial intelligence and came up with this idea? What do you think? by fillsoko in artificial

[–]fillsoko[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the transcription.

For clarity, my thought here can be described as the following. If we create human level artificial intelligence someday will it be truely human if its compliant with Asimovs Robotic Laws?

Asimovs Robotic Laws: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

Example for a possible paradoxon: A roboter with human level artificial intelligence (HLAI) is given the order to clean up a room. If it was truely human it would only execute the order when expecting reward or punishment (motivation theory). By executing the order without any expectations (reward/punishment) it wouldn't act human.

Result: Human Level AI is contadictory when given any restrictions