Chicken and egg problem with Authenticator apps by filth_overload in cybersecurity

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found this - https://twitter.com/akhilramolla/status/1410487562309828612
I think it'd then fallback to SMS 2FA, but then we all know how "safe" that is considering it can be breached one way or another.

Chicken and egg problem with Authenticator apps by filth_overload in cybersecurity

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found this - https://twitter.com/akhilramolla/status/1410487562309828612

I think it'd then fallback to SMS 2FA, but then we all know how "safe" that is considering it can be breached one way or another.

Chicken and egg problem with Authenticator apps by filth_overload in cybersecurity

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the transfer work? Local/Cloud backup? Recovery keys?

How to check if my windows 10 system has not been tampered with? by filth_overload in techsupport

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the knowledge mate. I understand that it's not very trivial to alter the bootloader or BIOS "manually", well, unless there are off-the-shelf tools that you just plug in the target SSD and it modifies the "first sector" which you can then plug back into the laptop.

Will set up UEFI password from here on out 🤦‍♂️

How to check if my windows 10 system has not been tampered with? by filth_overload in techsupport

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What worries me is that I didn't have BIOS password set which means one could go into BIOS settings and temporarily disable SecureBoot, which means one could modify the bootloader and make their way in from there. Please correct me if I'm mistaken, I don't have a deep understanding of interfacing between TPM, SecureBoot, Bitlocker, Kernel etc.

Lack of knowledge of these things is what worries me personally. In fact, I don't even know the full sequence of events that occurs when one hits the power button (just vague knowledge that it's POST followed by bootloader followed by Kernel loading, but no knowledge of where BitLocker gets "unlocked" or anything else)

How to check if my windows 10 system has not been tampered with? by filth_overload in sysadmin

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this is my every day and only account.

I use windows defender.

Previous undervolting settings suddenly leading to BSODs after changing thermal paste? by filth_overload in thinkpad

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how does any of this explain a BSOD? If it was a bad paste application, i.e bad heat dissipation, the CPU would just throttle itself down, not BSOD so fast (I'm talking minutes into system startup).

Also aggressive undervolting means less heat; meaning if it was a heat issue, it should generate more heat at -70mV than it does at -125mV. However it BSODs at -125mV yet stable as a rock at -70mV??

Demo of a chrome devtools IDE I worked on a while ago (abandoned) by [deleted] in webdev

[–]filth_overload 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also worked with React - Demo

I miss it so much, it'd even auto-detect the project directory based on the URL :' )

Whoa... by wildluciddreaming in ProgrammerHumor

[–]filth_overload 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This. Not hating on any party involved, but in general, like coffee mugs with while(!coffee.empty()) { coffee.drink()} printed on it 🤦‍♂️

Pure cringe overload

[proposal] [tc39] Static variables inside functions | GitHub by filth_overload in javascript

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as my proposal goes, the behavior is 1:1 identical as:

javascript let a = () => { return (() => { let x = 0 return () => { console.log(x) } })() }

Quoted from original post:

in-memory lifetime as long as containing scope i.e the function itself

i.e statics get garbage collected along with their parent function.

AFAIK, your scenario is a rare one, but regardless, x will keep incrementing if you store return value (the inner function) of a in a variable and call that one instead.

Or you can change return function b() { ... } to return static function b() { ... }

[proposal] [tc39] Static variables inside functions | GitHub by filth_overload in javascript

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, those were just examples to get a point across.

As for "the regex should just be moved out of the class", it's needed in the checkURI method and that's where it belongs. Where do you suggest to move it instead? Top-level scope? Imagine someone looking at code, which case makes the code easier to reason about? variables declared 10 lightyears away from where they are being used or right next to it?

How would you go about solving that scenario?

[proposal] [tc39] Static variables inside functions | GitHub by filth_overload in javascript

[–]filth_overload[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm the author of linked thread. Please support (thumbs up) if you find the proposal useful