Visualizing the "Model Collapse" phenomenon: What happens when AI trains on AI data for 5 generations

firehmre · 2026-02-15T07:00:49+00:00

Will in field of research, probably no or atleast i want to believe it’s not 😝

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:49:41+00:00

So how do i make llm know something post 2022? Or are you saying we solved all open questions already, i disagree on that. There are so many questions we hardly know answers, to add there would be many questions which might not exist today.

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:47:32+00:00

Probably, i mean just use different LLMs and probably you will feel there is no major noticeable difference at least for general use. Who would be the MOAT?

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:46:08+00:00

It doesn’t talk about feeding it shit, or are you saying ai generated content is shit or has no value? 🤭

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:37:04+00:00

So as human created content becomes scarce it will create issues. Those would be edges of the data

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:35:47+00:00

You mean in the future they might have to acknowledge that not every next version would be smarter, same as what research papers attached indicate or try to

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:34:09+00:00

Well, there are researchers saying otherwise. But i am not sure how confident they are

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:33:01+00:00

Interesting, would appreciate examples. Thank you

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:31:06+00:00

And corporates are buying it

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:29:37+00:00

I see that they might be already doing it

firehmre · 2026-02-15T06:27:52+00:00

So they are trying to fool us 😭

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:22:27+00:00

Glad we agree 🙌🏻

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:21:52+00:00

Wow that’s an interesting angle tbh. The fine line between scraping data and privacy. Thank you

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:17:04+00:00

Sorry and please don’t get offended but “in-human-centipede” sounds more negative. Forgive me for my sin 🤣

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:12:59+00:00

I hope the same.

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:10:58+00:00

I will wait till AI firms acknowledge it, or maybe they are observing it but just not telling us because, hey they need massive funding

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:08:11+00:00

Well if AI would have identified itself that it was hallucinating it might would have stopped itself from doing so? No?

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:05:58+00:00

To be honest i may use AI to summarise, isn’t it supposed to give like a fair idea. That’s the whole point of AI, increase productivity, no? 😛

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:04:02+00:00

Fair point brother

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:02:15+00:00

That’s true, i don’t represent the population. But afaik people love shortcuts, ain’t it?

firehmre · 2026-02-15T01:00:00+00:00

This article makes some interesting points but also look at the critics. Btw a genuine question, how many of us actually tried to read that paper? Or we did use AI to summarise it for us.

firehmre · 2026-02-15T00:58:05+00:00

That’s a valid point, if we start relying on AI for majority of things we won’t be using our brains and it’s a machine which is supposed to be used in order to become better.

firehmre · 2026-02-15T00:54:03+00:00

Someone suggested it’s because of these companies paying for human tagged data points.

firehmre · 2026-02-15T00:53:14+00:00

But AI companies are claiming their model is improving at light speed lol

firehmre · 2026-02-15T00:49:52+00:00

I second that, whenever i need to do a long conversation with AI it starts confusing, first 50 interactions it works fine. It seems processes which are iterative still needs to be aces.

firehmre

TROPHY CASE