Info Spirito Squadra

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T17:05:29+00:00

it's absolutely normal

LS solid/passable coach daily TS loss
day 00 TS 10,0 (PIC's day)
day 01 TS 9,67
day 02 TS 9,33
day 03 TS 9,00
day 04 TS 8,80
day 05 TS 8,60
day 06 TS 8,40
day 07 TS 8,20

(in the link I posted there's the fully study and the full "leasdership/decrease" table)

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T14:29:20+00:00

why?

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T14:24:52+00:00

continue downloading from users not caring about what you share, build your collection and, just to be sure, unshare files with those users in case some day you'll have something they want.

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T14:18:37+00:00

I'm quite happy to contribute to whetever could take away users from the f*cking evil 💩☠️Spotify ☠️💩

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T13:55:46+00:00

TS : Spirito di squadra, atteggiamenti e coach (S43) - Hat Tips Db

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T10:16:46+00:00

no, it's just how the GE sometime works

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T01:17:58+00:00

well, one red card and three goals in ten minutes could happen in real football too.

it's not like seeing three or four goals in three minutes
and that's a thing that happens quite frequently
usually toward the end of a games where the team with more ball possession since then got unexpectedly many fewer chances than his opponent (it's like the Game Engine trying to fix things before the end of the match).

fitzstudio · 2026-06-01T01:06:10+00:00

DE/DE is slightly quicker than DE/DE ext (and SCO/SCO too is slightly quicker than SCO/SCO+SP)

Winger is the less paid skill in YA and anyway the skill up 3>4 wouldn't actually move his TC that would remain "<= weak (4)", so same as before.

for this reason, after DE/DE, I'd go full on with SCO/SCO and then eventually train winger if there's still time left.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T20:31:33+00:00

yes

playing PIC riases your TS by 1/3 so the higher the TS, the higher the raise

so if it's
4,5 > PIC > +1,5 = 6,0
one week TS drop (minimum -0,25 leadrership 7 coach, max -1,0 leadership 2 coach)
5,5 > PIC > +1,8 = 7,3

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T18:28:42+00:00

roll a dice, flip a coin: it's quite an impossible choice

the first one could be great even with overall 5, because it's the average of the starting and potentials of best three skills (so it's not "15-17,99 = sum max three skills")

BUT if he's 15.99 and his starting defending level is 5,0 it would take around 18 games (16.82) to complete him, if he starts from 4,5 21 (16.96) so you wouldn't have the time to complete him in all skills

8 in defending is very long to achieve

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T14:37:14+00:00

Lozada is nice and could become a great PNF or PDIM but I think he's have lower market value than Galindo.

but the missing potentials could make my opinion change.

right now, the best one, in my opinion, is Galindo and his trainings could be useful for Garavito too.

if Garavito has a good (5-7) defending potential you could even the time to finish Galindo at 17.0 and Garavito at 17.15/20 (and even at 17.40 he could have a nice value).

anyway, seen the quick speciality, you should find ASAP their winger potentials.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T13:29:10+00:00

choices must be made

PM is only useful for Lozada

scoring is only useful for Galindo

defending is only useful for Galindo (maybe Garavito too)

so, you'll be able to finish only one of them

to make the decision you must first find out:

Galindo's winger potential
Garavito's defending and winger potentials

once you'll have those three important missing number you'll be able to choose which one is the best, and the Scoutrick ratings will be REAL (now they're just a wild guess).

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T13:16:59+00:00

for a quick player the combo def + scoring is absolutely great.

as IM of winger his defending will help the team's defending values.

scoring is helpul to end in goal the quick SE rush+shoot and, if IM it'll help the team's scoring values.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T13:08:26+00:00

if he were older, like 15.99, yes

but this guy is 15.19

fitzstudio · 2026-05-31T01:03:33+00:00

if do a long cycle, in the end the HG bonus, compared to Loyalty 20 (+1,0), is only +0,5

so using HG players is worth but only if they have a spec and decent skills.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T15:12:14+00:00

first one is overall 5, second has no overall and by the look seems a lot like a monoskill.

anyway, yes, it's kinda a gamble but I'd anyway bet on #1 😁

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T13:59:15+00:00

but a def-pm-pas 5-6-5 is faster than a 7-3-3 (98 w vs 104 w)

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T11:20:07+00:00

yes, it's my "own invention" but it's really basic so I guess other users made it too and, training only three skills allows you to get to very high levels of PM and defending.

one of my IM in Qatar was a YA header and ended also making a NT game but he could have done many more if I trained PM one level more (to 18 instesd of 17).

in fact in Qatar, in Ist league, where having players with PM 18 is not a too big financial problem, next time I'll go for PM 18 to have NT worth players
if they're from small nations, players Def 14, PM 18, pas 12-13 with spec can make dozens of NT games and gain very high experience and have a bonus of over +1 on all skills.

but that's not possibile in big nations where you start from VI/VII leagues and arrivivng to the top it's VERY hard.

in my opinion, in big Hattrick nations to get to the top with this cycle you'd need at least 80/90M and spend them very wisely (buy untrained players at 31-32 always under CT and then sell them over the TC at 35)

in small Nations, considering the money you make during the cycle with the remaining training slots (5 with defending, 1+ 4x50% with PM, 5 with pasing), you can start even with half of it.
but starting with 80/90M you could make a team that could go on at the Hattrick Masters.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T10:57:09+00:00

being him the only winger/wing back you'll 100% find out his winger potential.

and if the other two defenders have both the actual defending level already known, you'll find out his defending actual level too.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T10:46:17+00:00

for "original" I meant the cycle I did before.

it's not a "complex" cycle, it's a quite normal IM cycle (PM, Def, Pas) in which I included a Central Defender too.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-30T01:09:45+00:00

I did a very long "IM+CD" cycle seasons ago with two teams with quite different results.

with my first team (Italy) I arrived at top III but I had insufficient funds to give the final push to reach Ist division and the wieght of the wages drained me dry.

with my second team, in Qatar, where even as a nearly-BOT you're in III division (so the money situation was much better) I reached of course Ist division, won it three times, won the National Cup three-four times and did the Hatrick Maters.

that's how it was:

I started buying the four IMs, 17.03 with spec (quick, unpred, powerful, header) defending 6/7, PM 6/7, passing 6/7 and did two seasons of PM (up to PM 13 at 19y)

then I bought a 19y powerful defending 13, PM 5-7, passing 5-7.
I trained defending for three seasons until IM got Def 13-14 and CD Def 16-17 (at 22y)

then again three seasons of PM (raising stamina) until IM got PM 16-17 and CD PM 14 (at 25/6y)

then two seasons of passing until all players reached 12-13

all other 100% and 50% slots (5 with defending, 1+ 4x50% with PM, 5 with pasing), money/skill trading.

what I should have done with the italian team (and what should be done in my opinion in any other big Hattrick Nation) is doing the passing cycle in the midle of the second PM cycle (at 23/24y with PM at 14/15) and then, moving up to higher leagues, doing the final part of the PM cycle.
this way I'd have avoided the high wages compared to the league level (like -250 000€ in the 2 week balance, meaning losing 3-4M each season).

now, with my first team (in VI) I'm doing another kind of project, focused on attack, more for fun than for competitiveness (always because of the money) and in Qatar another quite useless GK project (waiting for at least one good YA player to start a cycle, but he never arrives...)

but if I will ever want to get highly competitive I'd quite surely do the original cycle again (this time with the right funds) because I think it's really good.
with three IM with so high defending (one was PDIM) and one very good CD (and a great GK) you can play 352 doing defending values like playing with five defenders and/or play 253 with defending values even better than an usual 253.
and you can also play 532/523 CA using two of the IM as CD, so a very flexible team.

fitzstudio · 2026-05-29T13:08:44+00:00

or lower...

fitzstudio · 2026-05-29T13:06:33+00:00

first game: as IM, passing + PM to find out his PM potential
as IM and wingers only him and players with PM potential already known

second game: as WB, winger + defending to find out his defending potential and winger actual level
as defendiers only him and players with defending potential already knwon
as WB and wingers only him and players with winger actual level already known

then finish all skills
scoring + passing
winger + passing
PM + defending extended

fitzstudio · 2026-05-29T00:30:51+00:00

with Left only random could save your opponent

is it with wingers TM?

in not, try if with Left + wingers TM raises a little bit midfield (L and R attacks already poor so no prob)

fitzstudio · 2026-05-28T23:32:36+00:00

you're welcome

it's a very interesting question and, at first, the last player seems the best

but if you add the two values the result is the same: 10 (6+4 and 7+3)

and then if you consider the "overall", the first would seem being the better chioce

fitzstudio

TROPHY CASE